NRNP 6635 Week3 Assignment Mood Disorders
NRNP 6635 Week3 Assignment Mood Disorders
NRNP 6635 Week 3: Mood Disorders Example
Patient Information:
Patient Initials: N. C Age: 17 Gender: Female Race: White American
Subjective:
Chief Complaint (CC): The patient’s mother expressed concern about her daughter’s moodiness during this time of year and requested an evaluation.
History of Present Illness (HPI): Ms. N. C, a 17-year-old White American female, presents with a chief complaint of feeling down and not doing well. Her mother expressed concern about her mood worsening during this time of year. She left the business program at school and is struggling with her academic projects, including a mock company assignment. She has difficulty concentrating, experiencing memory lapses, and has gained weight. Ms. N. C has also been sleeping through some of her classes and has experienced a decline in her social activities. She initially made friends and enjoyed outings, but lately, she has found her friends annoying and feels less motivated to engage in social activities. She dislikes the cold weather and describes the city as dark, grey, and miserable, contributing to her negative mood.
Past Psychiatric History:
- General Statement: The patient has no previous psychiatric history.
- Caregivers (if applicable): N/A
- Hospitalizations: No history of past hospitalizations
- Medication trials: No previous history of medication trials
- Psychotherapy or Previous Psychiatric Diagnosis: The patient does not have a previous psychiatric diagnosis or history of psychotherapy.
- Substance Current Use and History: She denies any history of substance use for herself, including nicotine, illicit substances (including marijuana), or alcohol. However, she reports taking caffeine daily. The patient does not report any withdrawal complications, such as tremors, delirium tremens, or seizures.
Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: The patient acknowledges a known history of depression within the family but denies any history of substance use.
Psychosocial History: N.C. is a 17-year-old White American female born and raised in New Orleans, Louisiana. Growing up, N.C. lived with both of her parents and four brothers. However, her residence is a specialty high school dormitory in Chicago, Illinois. Among her siblings, N.C. is the only girl and the youngest. Presently, she is not married and remains single, without any children. Being a full-time high school student, Natalie prioritizes her studies in the business program. In addition to her academic pursuits, she also holds a part-time job at a local coffee shop. She enjoyed socializing and participating in recreational activities in the past, but her interest in them has waned. Notably, N.C. has a clean record with no history or current legal issues.
Medical History: No history of hospital admission
- Current Medications: She takes no medications
- Allergies: NKDA
Reproductive History: She experienced menarche at 14 and continues to have regular menstrual cycles within a 28-day cycle without complications such as dysmenorrhea or menorrhagia. At present, she is unmarried and remains single, without any children. Furthermore, there is no record of her using contraceptives, and she confirms not being sexually active.
Review of Systems (ROS):
GENERAL: Ms. N. C is a 17-year-old White American female with a height of 5’2″ and a weight of 192 pounds. She presents with a downcast mood, slouched posture, and signs of decreased engagement, such as a lack of eye contact, reflecting her reported feelings of not doing well and exhibiting a low mood.
HEENT:
- Eyes: She has no loss of vision, double vision, painful eyes, or jaundice.
- Ears, Nose, and Throat: She does not experience any auditory impairments, such as hearing difficulties. Additionally, she is unaffected by symptoms like sneezing, congestion, a runny nose, or a sore throat. Furthermore, no recent nasal polyps, nosebleeds, or sinus infections have occurred. She exhibits no challenges related to chewing or swallowing, and there are no indications of gingivitis or bleeding gums.
- Skin: She denies experiencing any skin rashes or lesions. Her hair appears evenly distributed, showing no signs of hair loss. Additionally, her nails remain intact, and there are no indications of clubbing.
- Cardiovascular: The patient denies experiencing chest discomfort, palpitations, tightness, arrhythmias, or elevated blood pressure. There is also no indication of varicose veins, edema, or claudication.
- Respiratory: No shortness of breath, cough, or sputum.
- Gastrointestinal: The patient denies any presence of abdominal pain, tenderness, distention, or discomfort. There is no reported incidence of heartburn, constipation, diarrhea, or indigestion.
- Genitourinary: She denies dysuria, urinary frequency, urgency, and abnormal vaginal discharge.
- Neurological: She denies experiencing symptoms such as headache, dizziness, syncope, paralysis, ataxia, numbness, or tingling in the extremities. Additionally, there have been no observed alterations in bowel or bladder control.
- Musculoskeletal: No back pain, myalgia, joint pain, or stiffness
- Hematological: No anemia, bleeding, or bruising.
- Lymphatics: No enlarged nodes or splenectomy
- Endocrinologic: She denies sweating, cold, or heat intolerance: no polyuria or polydipsia.
Objective:
Vital signs: Temperature (T): 97.4°F, Pulse (P): 82 beats per minute, Respiration rate (R): 20 breaths per minute, Blood pressure (BP): 128/84 mmHg, Height: 5’2″ (62 inches), Weight: 192 lbs.
General: The patient mentions feeling down and not doing well.
Neurological: The patient mentions difficulty concentrating, memory problems, and changes in sleep patterns.
Diagnostic results: Comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, laboratory tests, including a complete blood count (CBC), thyroid function tests, and other relevant investigations, may be recommended to rule out any underlying medical causes for the patient’s symptoms.
Assessment:
Mental Status Examination:
Ms. N. C, a 17-year-old White American female, presents with a slightly overweight appearance, indicated by her weight of 192 lbs and height of 5’2″. During the interview, she appears disinterested and exhibits a passive attitude. Her behavior is characterized by a subdued manner and occasional sighing. Furthermore, her mood remains consistently low, and her affect is congruent with her depressed mood, displaying minimal variability and limited facial expressions.
Regarding speech, Ms. N. C’s responses are brief and lack elaboration. Her thought processes appear slowed, with delayed responses and occasional pauses. She expresses feelings of sadness and states that she is not doing well. Specifically, Ms. N. C reports leaving her program at school and struggling with her coursework, particularly in a special business program where she is required to create a mock company. She describes difficulty concentrating, memory problems, and detachment from her studies. Furthermore, she mentions being late on two projects and expresses frustration with her teachers.
Regarding her perceptions, Ms. N. C does not report any hallucinations, pseudo hallucinations, or illusions during the interview. However, she acknowledges difficulty sleeping, weight gain, and excessive daytime sleepiness. She also reports a decline in her social activities and expresses annoyance toward her friends, whom she finds dull. Additionally, she attributes her dislike for the current time of the year to the dark, grey, and miserable weather, which she believes has changed the city she once loved. She describes the snow in the city as grey and black, contrasting it with her previous expectation of white and beautiful snow.
In terms of cognition, Ms. Crew demonstrates impaired concentration and memory. This is evident in her difficulty remembering what she reads and forgetting the content of her classes shortly after leaving the room. Her insight into her current state is limited, as she attributes her struggles to external factors, such as her teachers and the weather, rather than considering internal emotional or psychological factors. At this time, Ms. Crew denies any suicidal or homicidal ideation. However, given her low mood, decreased interest in activities, social withdrawal, and negative perception of her environment, further exploration of her risk for self-harm is warranted.
Differential Diagnoses:
1. Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
The patient’s presentation is consistent with MDD. She exhibits symptoms such as persistent low mood, loss of interest in activities, difficulty concentrating, memory problems, changes in sleep patterns (oversleeping), weight gain, social withdrawal, and negative perception of her environment (Bains & Abdijadid, 2022). A comprehensive psychiatric evaluation is recommended to assess the severity of her depressive symptoms and rule out other possible causes.
2. Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)
The patient’s symptoms worsen during a specific time of the year (winter) and are associated with a dislike for the cold weather and the perception of the city as dark, grey, and miserable. These features suggest the possibility of SAD, a subtype of depression that occurs cyclically with the change in seasons (Munir & Abbas, 2022).
3. Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood
The patient’s symptoms, such as low mood, difficulty concentrating, changes in sleep and appetite, and social withdrawal, maybe a reaction to a specific stressor or life event, such as leaving the business program at school and struggling with academic projects (O’Donnell et al., 2019). If the symptoms are considered to be a direct response to this stressor and do not meet the criteria for a major depressive episode, an adjustment disorder with a depressed mood may be a possible diagnosis.
Reflections:
I agree with my preceptor’s assessment and diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) for this patient. The patient presents with several hallmark symptoms of MDD, which have been present for a significant time, causing impairment in multiple areas of her life. The patient’s family history of depression also supports the possibility of a genetic predisposition. A comprehensive psychiatric evaluation, ruling out other possible medical causes, would be necessary to confirm the diagnosis.
This case taught me the importance of considering seasonal factors in mood disorders, specifically Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD). The patient’s worsening symptoms during a specific time of the year and her negative perception of the weather and environment indicate the need to explore these factors and assess whether the symptoms meet the criteria for SAD (Munir & Abbas, 2022). Psychosocial factors such as the patient’s adjustment to a new environment and academic stressors must also be evaluated. Legal/ethical considerations, including confidentiality and obtaining appropriate consent for treatment, as well as the patient’s autonomy and involvement in treatment decisions, should be considered.
Social determinants of health, such as the patient’s age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic background, may influence her access to resources, and it is vital to address these factors when developing a treatment plan (Phuong et al., 2022). Health promotion and disease prevention efforts should involve educating the patient and her family about depression, strategies for managing symptoms, and encouraging healthy lifestyle behaviors. Additionally, a more thorough assessment of the patient’s social support network and psychosocial stressors and evaluation of any history of trauma or adverse childhood experiences could provide valuable insights into her current mental state.
NRNP 6635 Week3 Assignment Mood Disorders References
Bains, N., & Abdijadid, S. (2022). Major depressive disorder. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559078/
Munir, S., & Abbas, M. (2022, January 9). Seasonal depressive disorder. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568745/
O’Donnell, M. L., Agathos, J. A., Metcalf, O., Gibson, K., & Lau, W. (2019). Adjustment disorder: Current developments and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2537. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142537
Phuong, J., Riches, N. O., Madlock‐Brown, C., Duran, D., Calzoni, L., Espinoza, J. C., Datta, G., Kavuluru, R., Weiskopf, N. G., Ward‐Caviness, C. K., & Lin, A. Y. (2022). Social determinants of health factors for gene–environment: Challenges and opportunities. Advanced Genetics, 3(2), 2100056. https://doi.org/10.1002/ggn2.202100056
Week 3: Mood Disorders
While most people experience the sadness or grief at some point in their lives, it is typically of short duration and may occur in response to some type of loss. Clinically significant depression, on the other hand, is more disruptive and serious. It lasts longer and has more symptoms that interfere with daily functioning.
This week, you will explore the differences among mood disorders such as depressive, bipolar, and related disorders, and you will examine challenges in properly differentiating among them for the purpose of accurately rendering a diagnosis. You also will look at steps that can be taken to increase the likelihood that patients who are diagnosed with these disorders benefit from treatment and refrain from physically harming themselves or others.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Apply concepts, theories, and principles related to patient interviewing, diagnostic reasoning, and recording patient information
- Formulate differential diagnoses using DSM-5 criteria for patients with mood disorders across the lifespan
Learning Resources
NRNP 6635 Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Mood Disorders
Accurately diagnosing depressive disorders can be challenging given their periodic and, at times, cyclic nature. Some of these disorders occur in response to stressors and, depending on the cultural history of the client, may affect their decision to seek treatment. Bipolar disorders can also be difficult to properly diagnose. While clients with a bipolar or related disorder will likely have to contend with the disorder indefinitely, many find that the use of medication and evidence-based treatments have favorable outcomes.
To Prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources. Consider the insights they provide about assessing and diagnosing mood disorders.
- Download the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. Also review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar to see an example of a completed evaluation document.
- By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind.
- Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
- Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
- Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.
By Day 7 of Week 3
Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate a primary diagnosis. Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:
- Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
- Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
- Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
- Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
NRNP 6635 Week3 Assignment Mood Disorders Rubric Detail
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Create documentation in the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template about the patient you selected.
In the Subjective section, provide: |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response thoroughly and accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.
|
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.
|
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies.
|
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or, subjective documentation is missing.
|
In the Objective section, provide: • Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history • Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses. |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented.
|
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented.
|
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor inaccuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor inaccuracies.
|
0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or, objective documentation is missing.
|
In the Assessment section, provide: • Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form. • At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5 criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or inaccuracy. Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vagueness or inaccuracy. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or, assessment documentation is missing.
|
Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.). |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking.
|
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Reflections demonstrate critical thinking.
|
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking.
|
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.
|
Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old). |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.
|
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.
|
11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
Three evidence-based resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.
|
0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
Two or fewer resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.
|
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph development and organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. |
Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
|
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
|
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
|
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ five) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
|
Total Points: 100 |
---|
Also Read: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 6: Finalizing the Plan