NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research
NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research – Step-by-Step Guide
The first step before starting to write the NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment.
It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.
How to Research and Prepare for NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list.
You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.
How to Write the Body for NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research
In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456
Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.
NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research Instructions
With new information continually emerging, professional nurses must be equipped to critique scholarly literature and discern its value for practice. Select one current, quantitative scholarly nursing article related to your PICOT question and determine its strengths, limitations, and potential application. Have a look at NR505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative/Mixed Methods Critique.
Complete the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal ToolLinks to an external site. Download Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice Appendix E Evidence Appraisal Tool. Once you’ve completed the tool, use your own words to summarize your appraisal of the article. Include the following:
Description of the purpose
Explanation of research design
Discussion of sample
Description of data collection methods
Summary of findings
Strengths of the study (minimum of 1)
Limitations of the study (minimum of 1)
Recommendations regarding potential application for future practice that are insightful and appropriate.
Attach the article to your post, in addition to including the full reference for the article in your post.
NR505 Week 3 Collaboration Cafe: Appraisal of Quantitative Nursing Research Example
Summary of Appraisal Based on the Article by Falkhamn et al. (2023)
- Description of the Purpose
The study aimed to assess the outcomes of multimodal pain rehabilitation programs (MPRs) in a primary care setting for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The primary objective was to determine whether these programs enhance pain status, function, and quality of life, and reduce sickness absenteeism over a one-year period. Additionally, the research sought to investigate whether outcomes differ between women and men.
- Explanation of Research Design
The research employed a quantitative pragmatic cohort study design, utilizing data from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation (SQRP). This design enabled the researchers to track patients’ progress over time to evaluate the changes.
- Discussion of Sample
The sample included 744 patients (645 women and 99 men) aged between 18 and 65 years with chronic non-malignant pain. Participants were recruited from various primary care settings across Sweden and included diverse demographic characteristics.
- Description of Data Collection Methods.
Data were collected using questionnaires filled out by the patients, and clinical information was entered into the SQRP. These outcomes were the intensity of pain, physical functioning, emotional well-being, and sickness absenteeism assessed at both baseline and 12 months later.
- Summary of Findings.
The study found that IMMRPs led to significant improvements in pain levels, physical functionality, and emotional health. Additionally, there was a notable reduction in sick leave, especially among women. These benefits were maintained at the 12-month follow-up, indicating long-term effectiveness.
- Strengths of the Study
One major strength is the use of an extensive, well-documented patient registry and large sample size, which enhances the reliability and generalizability of the findings. The study is also strengthened by a long follow-up period that supports the long-term effectiveness of the intervention. Besides, it focused on the primary care setting, which is where most patients with chronic pain are treated.
- Limitations of the Study
One issue is the lack of a control group, which makes it difficult to attribute benefits purely to the IMMRPs. Furthermore, potential confounding factors that may have influenced the results were not considered.
- Recommendations for Future Practice.
The study suggests expanding the use of IMMRPs in primary care to improve chronic pain treatment. Future practice should prioritize multidisciplinary approaches, enhance patient education and self-management, and conduct long-term research to validate these findings. Randomized controlled trials should be conducted to establish causality and compare IMMRPs to other treatment approaches. Additionally, it is recommended to investigate the specific components of IMMRPs that contribute most to positive outcomes.
References
Falkhamn, L. M., Stenberg, G., Enthoven, P., & Britt-Marie Stålnacke. (2023). Interdisciplinary multimodal pain rehabilitation in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in primary care—a cohort study from the Swedish quality registry for pain rehabilitation (SQRP). 20(6), 5051–5051. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065051
