HLT 362V Grand Canyon University Summary and Descriptive Statistics Essay

HLT 362V Grand Canyon University Summary and Descriptive Statistics Essay

HLT 362V Grand Canyon University Summary and Descriptive Statistics Essay

There is often the requirement to evaluate descriptive statistics for data within the organization or for health care information. Every year the National Cancer Institute collects and publishes data based on patient demographics. Understanding differences between the groups based upon the collected data often informs health care professionals towards research, treatment options, or patient education.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

Using the data on the “National Cancer Institute Data” Excel spreadsheet, calculate the descriptive statistics indicated below for each of the Race/Ethnicity groups. Refer to your textbook and the Topic Materials, as needed, for assistance in with creating Excel formulas.

Provide the following descriptive statistics:

  1. Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median, and Mode
  2. Measures of Variation: Variance, Standard Deviation, and Range (a formula is not needed for Range).
  3. Once the data is calculated, provide a 150-250 word analysis of the descriptive statistics on the spreadsheet. This should include differences and health outcomes between groups.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Data Cancer Institute Week 5

American Indian / Alaska Native (includes Hispanic) Asian / Pacific Islander (includes Hispanic) Black (includes Hispanic) Hispanic (any race) White (includes Hispanic)
Year of Diagnosis Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000 Rate per 100,000
2000 45.7 41.8 77.8 34.2 68.8
2001 47.9 41 79 34.1 68.7
2002 44.6 40.4 75.8 34.1 68
2003 50 40.9 77.3 34.5 67.1
2004 51.7 40.5 75.1 35 65.8
2005 48.7 40.2 73.7 33.8 65.9
2006 46.4 39.8 73.4 32 65.8
2007 43.1 38.8 71.2 32.7 65.2
2008 45 38.5 70.8 32.2 63.9
2009 40.1 39 71.6 31.8 63.1
2010 42.4 37 67.8 30.3 60.4
2011 39.6 36.6 64.1 29.4 58.5
2012 36.6 36.7 64.3 28.2 57.5
2013 39.9 36.6 60.5 28.8 56.3
2014 32 34 61.3 26.8 55.4
2015 38.7 34.4 57.4 26 53.2

Rubric Detail

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
HLT-362V HLT-362V-O500 Summary and Descriptive Statistics 100.0
Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) 4: Good (85.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Measures of Central Tendency (Mean, Median and Mode) 25.0% Measures of central tendency are not calculated. Measures of central tendency are partially calculated, but two required calculations are missing. Measures of central tendency are mostly calculated, but one required calculation is missing. N/A Measures of central tendency are calculated.
Measures of Variation (Variance, Standard Deviation and Range) 25.0% Measures of variation are not calculated. Measures of central variation are partially calculated. Measures of central variation are mostly calculated, but one required calculation is missing. N/A Measures of central variation are calculated for variance and standard deviation. Range is identified.
Analysis of Descriptive Statistics 25.0% Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome recommendations between the groups is not included. Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome recommendations between the groups is incomplete or incorrect. Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome recommendations between the groups is included but lacks accuracy, explanation, or supporting details. Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome recommendations between the groups is complete and mostly accurate and contains explanation and supporting details. Analysis of the descriptive statistics for differences and health outcome recommendations between the groups is extremely thorough and accurate and includes substantial explanation and supporting details.
Excel Formulas 20.0% Excel formulas are incomplete or incorrect. Excel formulas are partially included or contain significant errors that affect problem solutions. Excel formulas are mostly included and contain minor errors. Excel formulas are included for all problems and contain only minor errors. Excel formulas are complete and correct for all problems.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage 100%

mersin escmersin esc