N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment
N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment
N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment
N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment
Summary
Briefly summarize your project: How was the assessment completed? Who was your target audience and how many were in the audience? What was your topic? How did you determine what your topic should be (justification)? When and where did you present the community education project? Who gave you permission to present at the location, was the permission form completed? How did you advertise your presentation? What educational materials did you use or provide to the audience? (Provide ID of yourself and action picture for proof.) N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment
ORDER COMPREHENSIVE SOLUTION PAPERS
Evaluation
Explain how you would evaluate whether the efforts to improve the health concern were effective. Include in your explanation the tools you might use to do this evaluation. Also, critically appraise your performance of the activity/project for this population.
How did the population respond? What aspects were you most satisfied/least satisfied with? What went well (at least 3 things)? What changes would you make in the future (at least 2 things)?
Conclusion
For nurses, reflection is integral to higher-level thinking. You should be able to critically analyze scenarios and possible outcomes as opposed to simply asking the right questions. Acute perception of the entire situation will be obtained because you are open to dealing with the contradictions that may challenge your initial bias.
Reflect on how your perspective of the community’s health and the national, state, and local efforts toward a healthier population has changed as a result of your fieldwork. Discuss the health of the target community population compared to national, state, local health findings N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment. Discuss how the interventions used would impact at the local, state, and national level (include information on your chosen Healthy People 2020 goals). Finally, what impact did your project have on your target population?
Please submit a recorded presentation of between 7 and 9 minutes that is a reflection of the project based on a full representation of all three parts above. You may video yourself discussing the project or you may create a PowerPoint presentation and record your voice to the presentation.
Use a recording platform of your choice and either upload as an mp4 or share the link directly to the video in the dropbox. ***Please do not record as voice-over PowerPoint because this cannot be saved in mp4 format or a link.*** If you submit your assignment as a powerpoint with voice over recording you will not receive credit for your assignment (or partial credit as you did not meet the full requirements of the assignment.
The presentation should include at least two scholarly sources other than provided materials. Please be sure to provide a photo of you at the location where you completed your education project and your ID again. You may submit your Reference page and photos in a separate file in the dropbox or insert them into the PowerPoint.
project Concert: each module had a minimum required practice hours related to your work on the main education project. Practice hours relate to time spent on project work (Discussion Board work does not apply). Document your hours for Module 8 in Project Concert. You should have an estimated 10-15 hours for Module 8. Access Project Concert.
Check your total practice hours for the course in Project Concert; each Module should have the minimum hours logged and there should be a total of between 70 and 100 hours for this course. Minimum required hours must be entered into Project Concert for Module 8 (8 hours). Some states/entities require hour logs for certification or employment N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment.
It is the student’s professional responsibility to ensure all hours are entered correctly in order to meet these requirements. Please see the Project Concert directions document in the Learning Materials on how to enter hours. N493 Community Health Nursing II Module 8 Project Summary Assignment
N493 Module 8 Assignment – Signature Assignment
Create a 7–9-minute video based on the following questions:
Briefly introduce your project:
- How was the assessment completed?
- Who was your target audience, and how many were in the audience?
- What was your topic? How did you determine what your topic should be (justification)?
- When and where did you present the community education project?
- Who gave you permission to present at the location? Was the permission form completed?
- How did you advertise your presentation?
- What educational materials did you use or provide to the audience?
Self-Evaluation
- Explain how you would evaluate whether the efforts to improve the health concern were effective.
- Include in your explanation the tools you might use to do this evaluation.
- Also, critically appraise your performance of the activity/project for this population.
- How did the population respond?
- What aspects were you most satisfied/least satisfied with?
- What went well (at least 3 items)?
- What changes would you make in the future (at least 2 items)?
Conclusion
- Reflect on how your perspective of the community’s health and the national, state, and local efforts toward a healthier population has changed because of your work.
- Discuss the health of the target community population compared to national, state, and local health findings.
- Discuss how the interventions used would impact at the local, state, and national levels (include information on your chosen Healthy People 2030 goals).
- Finally, what impact did your project have on your target population?
Please submit a recorded presentation of between 7 and 9 minutes that is a reflection of the project based on a full representation of all three parts above. You may video yourself discussing the project, or you may create a PowerPoint presentation and record your voice in the presentation.
You may also choose a recording platform of your choice, such as Screencast-o-matic, Zoom, Webex, YouTube, PowerPoint (utilizing audio slide recording), etc. Save the recording as a link, MP4, or PowerPoint file with audio and upload directly the dropbox.
The presentation should include at least two scholarly sources other than provided materials. You may submit your reference page in a separate file in the dropbox or insert them into the PowerPoint. You may submit your reference page in a separate file in the dropbox or insert them into the PowerPoint.
N493 Signature Assignment Rubric v2
| Criteria | Does Not Meet Expectations | Approaches Expectations | Meets Expectations | Exceeds Expectations | Criterion Score |
| Introduction to Project Weight: 30% | 0 points
(0 – 104 pts.) Discussion on the individualized learning objectives are missing or inaccurate. Recommendations for future changes are not included or are inaccurate. |
105 points
(105 – 119 pts.) Discussion of some of the individualized learning objectives lack key information and details, are vague, and/or inaccurate. Recommendations for future changes are included but not detailed enough for a full picture of changes. |
120 points
(120 – 134 pts.) Discussion of all individualized learning objectives are included and appropriate. Recommendations for future changes are appropriate. |
150 points
(135 – 150 pts.) Discussion of all individualized learning objectives is practical, insightful, and credible. Recommendations for future changes are enlightening, highly effective, and insightful. |
Score of Introduction to Project Weight: 30%,
/ 150 |
| Self-Evaluation Weight: 30% | 0 points
(0 – 104 pts.) Video recording is missing. |
105 points
(105 – 119 pts.) Video is present but lack details and thought to accomplish the project. Video is missing key elements in order to be effective. |
120 points
(120 – 134 pts.) Video reflects thought and meaning in order to accomplish the project. Self-evaluation, tools performance and response all included. |
150 points
(135 – 150 pts.) Video reflects effective and meaningful self-evaluation, tools, performance and responses. Project is detailed and elegantly crafted. |
Score of Self-Evaluation Weight: 30%,
/ 150 |
| Conclusion Weight: 20% | 0 points
(0 – 69 pts.) Demonstrates little logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within assignment; Many claims are weak or illogical. |
70 points
(70 – 79 pts.) Lacks some logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment/video. |
80 points
(80 – 89 pts.) Uses solid logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. |
100 points
(90 – 100 pts.) Provides exemplary logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the assignment. |
Score of Conclusion Weight: 20%,
/ 100 |
| Organization Weight: 10% | 0 points
(0-34 pts.) Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to follow ideas. Weak or no introduction of topic or purpose is unclear, weak, or missing. Conclusion lacks a summary of topic or is missing or irrelevant. |
35 points
(35 – 39 pts.) Organization is disorganized or irrelevant. Basic introduction that states topic but is presented in an uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary of topic without final concluding ideas, may inappropriately introduces new information. |
40 points
(40 – 44 pts.) Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good, logical flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains good summary of topic with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new information. |
50 points
(45 – 50 pts.) Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise ideas that impact reader. |
Score of Organization Weight: 10%,
/ 50 |
| Quality of Verbal Communication Weight: 10% | 0 points
(0-34 pts.) Word choice is excessively redundant, clichéd, and unspecific. Central message cannot be deduced, nor is it explicitly stated in presentation; delivery techniques (posture, gestures, eye contact, vocals) detract from understandability of presentation and speaker appears nervous and uncomfortable; language choices are unclear, minimally support effectiveness of presentation, or are inappropriate for audience. |
35 points
(35 – 39 pts.) Word choice is often unspecific, generic, redundant, and clichéd. Central message is basically understandable, but information is repeated and somewhat disorganized; delivery techniques make speaker appear tentative and unsure; language choice is mundane and commonplace, though somewhat appropriate for audience. |
40 points
(40 – 44 pts.) Word choice is specific and purposeful, and somewhat varied throughout. Central message is clear and consistent with content; delivery techniques make speaker appear comfortable; language choices are thoughtful and appropriate for audience. |
50 points
(45 – 50 pts.) Word choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic and varied. Central message is compelling and well supported; delivery techniques make speaker appear confident and polished; language choices are imaginative, memorable, and compelling to support the effectiveness of the presentation. |
Score of Quality of Verbal Communication Weight: 10%,
/ 50 |
