NRS 493 RS4 Literature Evaluation Table

ByLeon Kiprotich Leon Updated on

NRS 493 RS4 Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 Zheng, F., Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Deng, L. (2019). Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of diabetes research, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1073131

 

 Nassar, C. M., Montero, A., & Magee, M. F. (2019). Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models. Current diabetes reports, 19(10), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1222-6

 

 Lee, S. K., Shin, D. H., Kim, Y. H., & Lee, K. S. (2019). Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183323

 

 Chatterjee, S., Davies, M. J., Heller, S., Speight, J., Snoek, F. J., & Khunti, K. (2018). Diabetes structured self-management education programs: a narrative review and current innovations. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 6(2), 130-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30239-5
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Effects of an outpatient diabetes self-management education on patients with type 2 diabetes in China, 2019 Inpatient diabetes education in the real world: an overview of guidelines and delivery models, 2019 Effect of diabetes education through pattern management on self-care and self-efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes, 2019 Diabetes structured self-management education programs, 2018
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 Is a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program effective? Do hospitals face challenges in delivering inpatient diabetes education with the increase in readmission and hospitalizations? How does applying customized diabetes management programs through pattern management affect individual self-care behaviors and self-efficacy in patients with type two diabetes mellitus? What improvements have been seen in self-management diabetes education programs during the last two decades?
Purposes/Aim of Study Assessing the effectiveness of a simple outpatient diabetes self-management education program  

Providing an overview of the current state of inpatient diabetes education using the existing guidelines and education models.

 Investigating the effect of applying customized diabetes education programs on patients’ self-care behaviors and self-efficacy. Assessing the improvement in self-management diabetes education programs.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Single-blinded randomized control study Summary overview of the existing diabetes education models. Nonequivalent control group pretest-protest design Narrative review.
Setting/Sample

 

 60 patients in an outpatients department Xiangya Hospital, Central South University Diabetes-Specialty care models and diabetes-non-specialty care models were reviewed Type 2 diabetes patients of age 18-70 who visited the hospital between March 2017 and September 2017 Existing self-management diabetes education programs
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Two-group experimental design was used.  Diabetes Education models Summary review pretest-posttest design to test the effects of PM-based diabetes education utilizing CGMS results of patients with diabetes Systematic reviews of diabetes self-management education programs done between 2012 and 2017
Analysis

 

 SDSDA, PAID, FBG, postprandrial2 h

blood glucose, and HbA1c tests were all performed to evaluate

the effects of interventions for both groups before and

After three months.

 The existing inpatient diabetes education models were discussed in line with their reported outcomes The effects on self-efficacy and self-care behavior were analyzed using ANOVA. Collected data was analyzed using SPSS version 22 Analysis of the evidence-based reports of the articles reviewed.
Key Findings

 

 For the control group, Scores of the diabetes self-care activities significantly improved in the intervention group after the intervention Inpatient diabetes education should provide survival skills for self-management upon discharge until more outpatient education is provided. Positive changes in self-care behavior were observed. Self-care behaviors improved after diabetes education programs There is an increase in self-empowerment in self–management diabetes education models. There is an integration of psychosocial models in diabetes education.
Recommendations

 

 Diabetes self-management education can improve psychological conditions and glycemic control in T2DM. Both diabetes specialty care models and diabetes non-specialty care models can be used successfully for inpatient diabetes education. Customized diabetes education programs specific to each patient’s characteristics should be developed. Psychosocial issues and communication should be considered in self-management education.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

 The article provides evidence of the impact of education on patients with type 2 diabetes. The article shows that well-structured education is the basis of patient responsibility and increases patient self-management. The article provides an overview of inpatient patient education. It shows the superiority of structured education to other forms of patient education. It also alternatives for patient education. The article introduces the importance of education in increasing self-efficacy and self-management. It supports that patient education is the best intervention to improve self-efficacy and self-management because diabetes care is highly dependent on patients’ interventions. The study shows that structured education programs utilizing nursing terminologies are the best interventions to deliver quality education. The standardized terminologies are vital in covering patients’ differences

 

 

Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 Ghisi, G. L. D. M., Seixas, M. B., Pereira, D. S., Cisneros, L. L., Ezequiel, D. G. A., Aultman, C., Sandison, N., Oh, P., & da Silva, L. P. (2021). Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study. BMC public health, 21(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11300-y

 

 

 Xu, G., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Snetselaar, L. G., Hu, F. B., & Bao, W. (2018). Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study. Bmj, 362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1497

 

 Rahaman, H. S., Jyotsna, V. P., Sreenivas, V., Krishnan, A., & Tandon, N. (2018). Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 22(1), 74. https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_148_17 Galaviz, K. I., Weber, M. B., Straus, A., Haw, J. S., Narayan, K. V., & Ali, M. K. (2018). Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose. Diabetes Care, 41(7), 1526-1534. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-2222

 
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Patient education program for Brazilians living with diabetes and prediabetes: findings from a development study, 2021 Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among U.S. adults in 2016 and 2017: a population-based study, 2018 Effectiveness of a patient education module on diabetic foot care in outpatient setting: An open-label randomized controlled study. Global diabetes prevention interventions: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of the real-world impact on incidence, weight, and glucose, 2018
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 Can there be a diabetes education program that is specifically applicable to Brazilians living with diabetes? How prevalent is diabetes type 1 and 2 among us adults? How effective is the foot care education module that the team had developed? Can LSM strategies implemented under real-world conditions lower diabetes risk and promote weight loss?
Purposes/Aim of Study Develop a diabetes patient education program applicable to the Brazilian population living with diabetes. Estimating the prevalence of diagnosed total diabetes type 1 and 2 in the U.S. general population and the proportion among U.S. adults. Assessing the effectiveness of a foot care education module the authors had developed. The purpose of this study was to synthesize global evidence on the impact of LSM strategies on diabetes incidence and risk factors in one parsimonious model.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Narrative of existing diabetes education programs Nationwide, population-based, cross-sectional survey Randomized controlled study Epidemiological study design
Setting/Sample

 

 Both inpatient and outpatient Brazilians living with diabetes. Diabetes patient educators National health interview survey 2016 and 2017. U.S. adults aged 20 and above 165 Adult patients diagnosed with Diabetes type 1 or 2 attending endocrinology from July 2015 to December 2016 PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for studies published between January 1990 and April 2015.
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Review of the development process of diabetes patient education programs. Data was collected through NHIS and standardized questionnaires. Block randomization was used to divide the patients into a control group and an intervention group Meta-analysis was used to obtain evidence of the effects
Analysis

 

 Best practices in diabetes education programs in Brazil and South America were analyzed using systematic reviews. Data was statistically analyzed using survey weights. Randomized control trials were used to analyze the effect of healthcare education on foot care knowledge and behavior in diabetes patients. random-effects meta-analysis techniques were applied to obtain a pooled pre/post mean difference for weight and glucose outcomes among intervention participants
Key Findings

 

 Development phases of a diabetes education program were explained. A program applicable to Brazilian patients was developed. The study provided benchmark estimates on the national prevalence of diagnosed type 1 diabetes (0.5%) and type 2 diabetes (8.5%) among U.S. adults. Among U.S. adults with diagnosed diabetes, type 1 and type 2 diabetes accounted for 5.6% and 91.2%, respectively. The module was effective. Persistent change in foot care behavior requires the patient to have reinforcement regularly. The study found that participants receiving an intervention had a 29% lower risk of developing diabetes, lost 1.5 kg more body weight, and reduced FBG by 0.09 mmol/L more than participants not receiving one.
Recommendations

 

  

The program’s effectiveness must be tested in the future as meeting individual needs requires sustained efforts.

 The study recommends further investigations into the disparities in the prevalence The study recommends further improvement on the diabetes patient education module Even though LSM strategies can succeed in diabetes prevention, the study recommends further studies in low-income countries.
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

 The article shows the applicability and importance of education in diabetes care. The article provides evidence of increased self-management and better patient education after diabetes education, hence proving the project’s viability. The article provides data on the real-world prevalence of diabetes. It portrays it as a priority clinical problem. In addition, it recommends specific interventions such as mass awareness and patient education to reduce the diabetes healthcare burden. The article reviews the costs of diabetes. It also reviews its interventions and preventability. The article recommends rigorous public sensitization and patient education to prevent diabetes and its complications The article reviews the global diabetes prevention interventions. Diabetes education features as an essential intervention in the prevention and prognosis of diabetes.