NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

  • Develop a 2-4 page proposal for a policy that should help to improve health care and outcomes for your target population.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. Have a look at NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 3 Letter to the Editor: Population Health Policy Advocacy. 

Cost and access to care continue to be main concerns for patients and providers. As technology improves our ability to care for and improve outcomes in patients with chronic and complex illnesses, questions of cost and access become increasingly important. As a master’s-prepared nurse, you must be able to develop policies that will ensure the delivery of care that is effective and can be provided in an ethical and equitable manner.

As a master’s-prepared nurse, you have a valuable viewpoint and voice with which to advocate for policy developments. As a nurse leader and health care practitioner, often on the front lines of helping individuals and populations, you are able to articulate and advocate for the patient more than any other professional group in health care. This is especially true of populations that may be underserved, underrepresented, or are otherwise lacking a voice. By advocating for and developing policies, you are able to help drive improvements in outcomes for specific populations. The policies you advocate for could be internal ones (just within a specific department or health care setting) that ensure quality care and compliance. Or they could be external policies (local, state, or federal) that may have more wide-ranging effects on best practices and regulations.

Preparation

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

    • What are the relevant best practices from a population health standpoint (cultural competence, disease prevention, and interventions) for your chosen health issue and vulnerable population?
      • How are these best practices relevant to your chosen health issue and vulnerable population?
        • Do the best practices make any reference to standards of care or benchmarks that should be achieved?
      • How could these best practices be leveraged to help inform or develop a policy and guidelines to improve care and outcomes for the vulnerable population you are working with?
    • How could technology be used to identify health concerns or collect data that could help health care practitioners determine which health care issues to focus on in a population?
      • What are the relevant laws, regulations, or policies for employing any of the technology you might find useful?
    • What type of policy and guidelines would be most likely to ensure improvements in care and outcomes related to your chosen health issue and vulnerable population?
      • Are there any policies in existence that could help inform your own policy development?
      • How might your proposed policy and guidelines influence the way in which care is accessed?
      • How might your proposed policy and guidelines influence the amount of access that is available?

Assessment 2 will build on the health issue, vulnerable population, and position that you started to develop in the first assessment. For Assessment 2, you will develop a proposal for a policy and a set of guidelines that could be implemented to ensure improvements in care and outcomes. Refer to the resource listed below:

    • Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal [DOC].

Scenario

The analysis of position papers that your interprofessional team presented to the committee has convinced them that it would be worth the time and effort to develop a new policy to address your specific issue in the target population. To that end, your interprofessional team has been asked to submit a policy proposal that outlines a specific approach to improving the outcomes for your target population. This proposal should be supported by evidence and best practices that illustrate why the specific approaches are likely to be successful. Additionally, you have been asked to address the ways in which applying your policy to interprofessional teams could lead to efficiency or effectiveness gains.

Instructions

For this assessment you will develop a policy proposal that seeks to improve the outcomes for the health care issue and target population you addressed in Assessment 1. If for some reason you wish to change your specific issue and/or target population, contact your FlexPath faculty.

The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your submission addresses all of them. You may also want to read the Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal [DOC] to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

    • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high-quality outcomes.
    • Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
    • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the assessment example, linked in the Assessment Example section of the Resources, to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Additional Requirements

    • Length of proposal: 2-4 double-spaced, typed pages, not including title page or reference list. Your proposal should be succinct yet substantive.
    • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3-5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that supports the relevance of or need for your policy, as well as interprofessional considerations. Resources should be no more than five years old.
    • APA formatting: The APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] will help you in writing and formatting your analysis.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

      • Propose a policy and guidelines that will lead to improved outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Competency 2: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional interventions in achieving desired population health outcomes.
      • Analyze the potential for an interprofessional approach to implementing a proposed policy to increase the efficiency or effectiveness of the care setting to achieve high quality outcomes.
    • Competency 3: Analyze population health outcomes in terms of their implications for health policy advocacy.
      • Advocate the need for a proposed policy in the context of current outcomes and quality of care for a specific issue in a target population.
    • Competency 4: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
      • Communicate proposal in a professional and persuasive manner, writing content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and spelling.
      • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

NURS-FPX6026 Assessment 2 Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal Example

Biopsychosocial Population Health Policy Proposal

The LGBTQ community is prone to discrimination in care delivery. This population, especially teens, is also prone to violence and other issues, such as discrimination, as seen in the previous assessment. Strong fiscal government support exists, but society’s reciprocation is absent, making the LGBTQ community vulnerable. Many institutions do not have policies to protect the LGBTQ community and rely on the support they get from the government and other organizations, which is insufficient because organizational support is significant. In healthcare facilities, policies are necessary to help protect patients and nurses who identify with the LGBTQ community. This policy proposal paper focuses on developing a policy to improve health and eliminate LGBTQ community discrimination in healthcare facilities.

Policy Proposed

The LGBTQ community lacks adequate representation in schools, hospitals, media, and peers, leading to widespread discrimination despite clear federal and state laws that protect them. Society is quite unreceptive, and policies at the facility/ organizational level can help strengthen federal and state laws and reduce the current health disparities in this population. Current policies for care providers’ cultural competencies aim to increase their ability to cater to varied populations (AHRQ, n.d.). However, various social, cultural, and political factors play roles in LGBTQ community individuals’ lives in their lifespan, which can affect their access to and utilization of healthcare services.

The proposed policy is a robust and continuous professional education and a fine system in the healthcare facility to eliminate stereotypes among healthcare providers that prevent the LGBTQ community from accessing care (Mateo & Williams, 2020). The policy follows the recommendations and position statements of the American Nurses Association and the recommendations of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The policy will be implemented in the healthcare facility where the providers will be educated on the care of the LGBTQ community, their needs, and their rights (McGlynn et al., 2020).

The policy will also be backed by a fine system where complaints of rights violations will be taken seriously and investigated. Responsible healthcare providers will be held accountable for violating their rights. The customer services department should also be sensitized to the need for attention to the LGBTQ community’s complaints. The LGBTQ community has human rights, like every other community member, and discrimination from healthcare access violates them and the law (McGlynn et al., 2020).

Eliminating stereotypes will reduce fear in this community and thus improve care-seeking behavior. Fines will also eliminate discrimination, and thus individuals will have access to quality care services. The policies might face excellent resistance in the healthcare facility, primarily due to spiritual and personal bias (Lekwauwa et al., 2022). Investing in education and cultural competencies before implementing these policies will help reduce resistance and achieve the desired outcomes.

Need for the Policy

Studies have evaluated the presence and significance of discrimination in the LGBTQ community. They have shown that the LGBTQ community is prone to health disparities, including an increased risk for mental health problems and violence, and access to healthcare services. This marginalized population faces these problems, especially after disclosing their sexual orientation. Depression and anxiety are common in this community, hence the fear of disclosure. Knoepp and Mirabella (2022) note that the community is generally at more risk than the general population for diseases such as sexually transmitted infections, violence, substance abuse, mental health illnesses, obesity, and eating disorders.

Other problems include breast and cervical cancer and heart disease related to lifestyles such as smoking. Guerrero-Hall et al. (2021) note that the LGBTQ community has major problems accessing obstetric and gynecologic health services. For example, individuals who identify as men may have problems accessing cervical cancer screening services. In addition, they may also have trouble accessing services for conditions such as sexually transmitted infections, which require examination due to fear of disclosure.

Most of them also fear seeking healthcare services, especially when the services are gender-oriented, such as family planning services. They fear discrimination and ill-treatment or their hidden secrets from getting out to the public and thus constantly fear accessing healthcare services (Ramsey et al., 2022). Ramsey et al. (2022) note that discrimination and fear of stereotypes worsen the decreased access to healthcare services and further contribute to the healthcare disparities in the LGBTQ community.

Casey et al. (2019) show that LGBTQ community members verbalize avoiding healthcare services due to anticipated discrimination and discrimination encounters experienced in the past. The population is more vulnerable to healthcare conditions seen earlier, and discrimination widens the disparity, hence the need for interventions to eliminate discrimination and ensure increased access to healthcare services (Casey et al., 2019). Thus, there is a need for this policy to eliminate stereotypes and discrimination, thereby increasing access to healthcare services for this vulnerable population.

The policy will reduce health disparities and improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population. Yarhouse and Haldeman (2021) note that complexities exist at the intersection between religion/spirituality and the LGBTQ community. Individuals should not be forced to participate in activities that conflict with their spiritual or religious affiliations, and these affiliations should be considered when implementing such policies.

Interprofessional Approach to Implementing the Proposed Policy

The interprofessional approach requires the input and participation of various professionals in implementing the policy. An interprofessional approach means that all professionals’ perspectives are encompassed, so the policy addresses a problem holistically. Am et al. (2020) note that an interprofessional approach to implementing a policy ensures the policy is thoroughly reviewed and improved, hence yielding quality outcomes. The interprofessional approach also increases acceptance of a policy because many professionals can identify with it, decreasing resistance and increasing effectiveness. Professionals own the policy change because they are involved, thereby facilitating quality change management. Awadallah et al. (2022) note that an interprofessional team helps review policies and ensure they meet all professionals’ standards and codes of practice.

In this policy, the interprofessional approach will increase the project’s acceptability by ensuring it aligns with the professional standards of each healthcare profession. In addition, an interprofessional approach will ensure that the policies developed are implemented promptly for better health outcomes. Elertson and McNiel (2021) show that interprofessional approaches have significantly changed nurses’ education to increase their knowledge and attitude toward the care of the LGBTQ community. The contrary literature states that the interprofessional approach to implementing policies is resource- and time-intensive (Montana et al., 2021). However, the approach ensures that the interventions and policies implemented are high quality and achieve the desired outcomes.

Conclusion

The LGBTQ community is exposed to many healthcare problems, such as sexually transmitted infections, mental health issues, and gynecological problems. They have trouble accessing healthcare services due to past experiences and anticipated discrimination. Health disparities exist in this community, as seen in the higher rates of depression, sexually transmitted infections, and other diseases compared to the general population. Policies to reduce organizational stereotypes that prevent individuals from accessing healthcare services. The policy proposed aims to reduce healthcare stereotypes and implement fines that will eliminate discrimination against the LGBTQ community and reduce health disparities in this population. An interprofessional approach to implementing the policy change will help reduce resistance and ensure high-quality outcomes

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Improvement (AHRQ) (n.d.). Patient Safety Concerns and the LGBTQ+ Population Patient Safety Network. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/patient-safety-concerns-and-lgbtq-population

Am, C., Godinho, M. A., Murthy, S., Manapure, N. H., Ramadevi, N., Kinjawadekar, A., Burdicl, W., Gilbert, J., Fisher, J., & Vinod Bhat, H. (2020). The built environment and health: fostering interprofessional collaboration for better policy recommendations. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(3), 414–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1650009

Awadallah, N., Rollins, V., Oung, A., Dickinson, M., de la Cerda, D., Calcaterra, S., Orr, J. & Grushan, M. (2022). An Interprofessional Approach to Chronic Pain Management and Education. Family Medicine, 54(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2022.753618

Casey, L. S., Reisner, S. L., Findling, M. G., Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M., Sayde, J. M., & Miller, C. (2019). Discrimination in the United States: Experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer Americans. Health services research, 54, 1454–1466. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13229

Elertson, K., & McNiel, P. L. (2021). Answering the call: Educating future nurses on LGBTQ healthcare. Journal of homosexuality, 68(13), 2234–2245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1734376

Guerrero-Hall, K. D., Muscanell, R., Garg, N., Romero, I. L., & Chor, J. (2021). Obstetrics and gynecology resident physician experience with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer healthcare training. Medical Science Educator, 31, 599–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01227-9

Knoepp, L., & Mirabella, O. (2022). LGBTQ Healthcare Issues. In Clinical Approaches to Hospital Medicine: Advances, Updates, and Controversies (pp. 255–264). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95164-1_17

Lekwauwa, R., Funaro, M. C., & Doolittle, B. (2022). Systematic review: The relationship between religion, spirituality, and mental health in adolescents who identify as transgender. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19359705.2022.2107592

Livingston, N. A., Berke, D., Scholl, J., Ruben, M., & Shipherd, J. C. (2020). Addressing diversity in PTSD treatment: Clinical considerations and guidance for the treatment of PTSD in LGBTQ populations. Current Treatment Options In Psychiatry, 7, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-020-00204-0

Mateo, C. M., & Williams, D. R. (2020). Addressing bias and reducing discrimination: The professional responsibility of health care providers. Academic Medicine, 95(12S), S5-S10. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003683

McGlynn, N., Browne, K., Sherriff, N., Zeeman, L., Mirandola, M., Gios, L., Davis, R., Donisis, V., Farinella, F., Rosinska, M. Niedźwiedzka-Stadnik, M., Pierson, A, Pinto, N., & Hugendubel, K. (2020). Healthcare professionals’ assumptions as barriers to LGBTI healthcare. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22(8), 954-970. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1643499

Montano, A. R., Cornell, P. Y., & Gravenstein, S. (2021). Barriers and facilitators to interprofessional collaborative practice for community‐dwelling older adults: An integrative review. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15991

Ramsey, Z. S., Davidov, D. M., Levy, C. B., & Abildso, C. G. (2022). An etic view of LGBTQ healthcare: Barriers to access according to healthcare providers and researchers. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 34(4), 502–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2022.2042452

Yarhouse, M. A., & Haldeman, D. C. (2021). Introduction to special section on current advances in the intersection of religiousness/spirituality and LGBTQ+ studies. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 13(3), 255–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000438