NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

How to Research and Prepare for NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation Instructions

For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment. As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement.

The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter. Have a look at Capella NURS-FPX4020 Assessment 1 Enhancing Quality and Safety.

You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will create the opportunity to check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this formative will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

NURS-FPX4010 DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY

• Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
  • Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
• Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
  • Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
• Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
  • Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
• Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
• Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional, respectful manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
• NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation.

PROFESSIONAL CONTEXT

This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.

SCENARIO

In addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study.

However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA. When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.

INSTRUCTIONS

Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations. Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

• Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
• Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
• Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
• Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
• Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:

• Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.
  • What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?
  • Why should the audience care about solving it?
• Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.
  • Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?
  • How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?
• Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.
  • What is the objective?
  • How likely is it to work?
  • What will the interdisciplinary team do?
• Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.
  • How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?
  • How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?
  • How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?
• Part 5: Evaluation.
  • What would a successful outcome of the project look like?
  • What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?
    • How could this be used to show the degree of success?

Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

• Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.
• Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old.
• APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

NURS-FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation Example 1 Notes

Stakeholder Presentation on Cultural and Professional Differences within the Interdisciplinary Team

Presentation Objectives

Hello everyone. My name is_. Welcome to today’s presentation. The focus of this presentation is to roll out a proposal for addressing one of the critical issues affecting the organization: the increase in interprofessional and cultural differences within the interdisciplinary team. Generally, the presentation describes the organizational issue and the relevance of embarking on an interdisciplinary team approach in addressing the issue. We will also explore the proposed interdisciplinary plan project and explain the implementation process based on the available resources. Finally, we will consider an evaluation plan for the implementation and describe the criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.

Organizational Issue

One of our organization’s most significant challenges is cultural and professional differences within interdisciplinary teams. There are various ways in which cultural and professional differences manifest in an interdisciplinary healthcare team. According to Hopf et al. (2021), cultural differences in interprofessional teams manifest in variations in communication styles, beliefs about healthcare, and how illness an. Professional differences, on the other hand, manifest in differing training backgrounds, terminologies and priorities among professionals, hierarchical dynamics, and varying ethical perspectives.

Impact of the Organizational Issue

The organizational issue of cultural and professional differences within the interprofessional team may impact the organization significantly. Cultural and professional differences contribute to other barriers to effective teamwork, collaboration and decision-making, hence reducing team effectiveness.  It also contributes to miscommunication among the team, conflicts, role confusion, and disrespect or looking down on some professionals in the team. In addition, a study by Sukhera et al. (2022) found that cultural and professional differences within the interdisciplinary team compromise the overall interprofessional team effectiveness.

Why Address the Issue?

Why should we care about addressing cultural and professional differences within the interdisciplinary team? First, teamwork and interprofessional collaboration is a major pillar in healthcare, and teams will always be culturally diverse, encompassing different professionals, hence the need to respect each other, cultural diversity and their professions. According to Dowell et al. (2022), addressing cultural and interprofessional differences within a healthcare team is essential for improving collaboration, patient outcomes, and overall organizational efficiency.

By fostering open communication and understanding, we can enhance team cohesion, ensuring that all professionals work seamlessly together. Diverse perspectives enrich patient care, allowing for a more holistic, patient-centered approach that meets the unique needs of individuals. Additionally, creating an inclusive and supportive work environment promotes job satisfaction, reduces conflicts, and ultimately improves the quality of care. Therefore, it is essential to address the issue, thus strengthening teamwork and enhancing decision-making within the team.

Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Approach

An interdisciplinary approach is the best way to address cultural and professional differences since it affects the entire team, and all team members are responsible for addressing it. An interprofessional approach also brings together the diverse expertise of nurses, physicians, and allied health professionals into the project, increasing its chances of success. Each discipline will bring a unique perspective on the issues contributing to the differences and work collaboratively to ensure that the issue is addressed.

Engaging all team members in addressing the issue reduces the chances of resistance to change and poor participation. Additionally, Okpala, (2021) note that since all teams are responsible for cultivating differences within the team, it is essential for the team to hold collective responsibility in addressing them. Therefore, the collective approach will foster accountability and improve team dynamics, allowing us to coordinate patient care better, optimize resources, and ensure efficient interprofessional collaboration.

Interdisciplinary Plan Summary

The primary objective of this plan is to improve teamwork, communication, and collaboration by addressing cultural and professional differences within the healthcare team. Evidence from a study by Warren and Warren (2023),  shows that interprofessional training has effectively reduced cultural and professional differences within healthcare teams by promoting collaboration and increasing awareness of these differences, and how to address them.

The plan involves training all staff on cultural competency and professional respect, implementing feedback channels to promote real-time feedback, and continuously monitoring the process. With buy-in from leadership and a commitment to team collaboration, this approach is highly likely to succeed. By adopting this intervention, we expect to observe fewer differences in the interdisciplinary teams in the organization, especially based on cultural and professional lines, hence better coordination among staff, and improved patient safety outcomes across the organization.

Implementation Strategy and Justification

A phased implementation approach will ensure smooth adoption of this plan. First, awareness campaigns will introduce the initiative, followed by structured training sessions and continuous reinforcement through policy changes. Initial pilot training will be conducted to refine strategies before full-scale implementation. Funding will be allocated efficiently, covering workshops, online modules, and team retreats.

Staff schedules will be adjusted to accommodate training without disrupting patient care. To prevent resource waste, training effectiveness will be assessed regularly, and staff feedback will be used to make necessary modifications. The plan is financially justified, as improved teamwork reduces conflicts and enhances patient safety.

Resource Management

According to Gagnon et al. (2024), Effective resource management is key to the success of any implementation plan. For instance, the financial investment is justified by the long-term benefits of improved patient safety and care coordination, which will reduce the risk of costly errors and inefficiencies. Moreover, human resources will be managed by ensuring that staff time for training and meetings is well-planned and does not interfere with patient care. Leadership will also play a critical role in ensuring that the plan is prioritized and that resources are used efficiently. With regular evaluations and feedback mechanisms, we will ensure that the implementation is sustainable and that resources are not wasted.

Evaluation Criteria and Measuring Success

Success will be measured using both qualitative and quantitative indicators. Improved teamwork, increased cultural awareness, and reduced role confusion will demonstrate the effectiveness of the intervention. Higher staff satisfaction rates and reduced burnout will indicate a positive work culture, following decreased differences. A key metric will be the reduction of miscommunication-related errors arising from cultural and professional differences, hence affecting patient care. Pre- and post-training surveys will assess knowledge gains, while patient satisfaction reports will reflect improved care experiences.

Additionally, long-term tracking will help sustain improvements and refine strategies over time. Olafsen et al. (2021) note that staff participation in training sessions is one of the effective evaluation metrics for organizational change initiatives. The comprehensive evaluation ensures that the plan delivers lasting benefits to healthcare professionals and patients. The evaluation criteria are also supported by a study by Errida and Lotfi (2021) that showed the effectiveness of pre- and post-training surveys and staff feedback on interprofessional team initiatives.

Conclusion

Based on the project implementation plan proposed above and the justification, there is a need to address the cultural and professional differences issue in the organization. The project will improve organizational efficiency through enhanced collaboration practices. By adopting a cultural competency and interprofessional training and fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, we can significantly reduce cultural and professional differences, enhance patient care, promote an inclusive, cohesive and respectful environment for all team members, and improve staff satisfaction. The interdisciplinary approach is the most appropriate for promoting success in this project, as justified above. The support for the project implementation from the leaders and the entire interprofessional team is, therefore, paramount.

References

• Dowell, S., Charnetski, M., Tarbet, A., & Palaganas, J. C. (2022). Cultural Considerations in Interprofessional Education: A systematic scoping review. https://doi.org/10.22230/jripe.2022v12n1a333
• Gagnon, J., Breton, M., & Gaboury, I. (2024). Decision-maker roles in healthcare quality improvement projects: A scoping review. BMJ Open Quality, 13(1), e002522. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002522
• Hopf, S. C., Crowe, K., Verdon, S., Blake, H. L., & McLeod, S. (2021). Advancing workplace diversity through the culturally responsive teamwork framework. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 30(5), 1949–1961. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00380
• Okpala, P. (2021). Addressing power dynamics in interprofessional health care teams. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 14(4), 1326-1332. https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2020.1758894
• Sukhera, J., Bertram, K., Hendrikx, S., Chisolm, M. S., Perzhinsky, J., Kennedy, E., Lingard, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2022). Exploring implicit influences on interprofessional collaboration: A scoping review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 36(5), 716–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1979946
• Warren, J. L., & Warren, J. S. (2023). The case for understanding interdisciplinary relationships in health care. Ochsner Journal, 23(2), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.31486/toj.22.0111
• Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021). The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13, 18479790211016273. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790211016273
• Olafsen, A. H., Nilsen, E. R., Smedsrud, S., & Kamaric, D. (2021). Sustainable development through commitment to organizational change: the implications of organizational culture and individual readiness for change. Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(3), 180-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-05-2020-0093