NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies

NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies Instructions

Is there a difference between common practice and best practice?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a rookie, you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.

Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest.

Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.

Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.

Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project – Clinical Inquiry & Research Methodologies Example

Matrix Worksheet Template

Use this document to complete Part 1 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Full citation of selected article	Article #1	Article #2	Article #3	Article #4
	Wee, L. E. I., Conceicao, E. P., Tan, J. Y., Magesparan, K. D., Amin, I. B. M., Ismail, B. B. S., Toh, H. X., Jin, P., Zhang, J., Wee, E. G. L., Ong, S. J. M., Lee, G. L. X., Wang, A. E., How, M. K. B., Tan, K. Y., Lee, L. C., Phoon, P. C., Yang, Y., Aung, M. K., Sim, X. Y. J. and Ling, M. L. (2021). Unintended consequences of infection prevention and control measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. American Journal of infection control, 49(4), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.10.019	Marx, J. F., Callery, S., & Boukidjian, R. (2019). Value of certification in infection prevention and control. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(10), 1265-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.04.169	Munoz-Price, L. S., Bowdle, A., Johnston, B. L., Bearman, G., Camins, B. C., Dellinger, E. P., Geisz-Everson, M. A., Holzmann-Pazgal, G., Murthy, R., Pegues, D., Prielipp, R. C., Rubin, Z. A., Schaffzin, J., Yokoe, D., & Birnbach, D. J. (2019). Infection prevention in the operating room anesthesia work area. Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 40(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2018.303	Rutala, W. A., & Weber, D. J. (2019). Best practices for disinfection of non-critical environmental surfaces and equipment in health care facilities: A bundle approach. American Journal of Infection Control, 47S, A96–A105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.014
Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest)	This article relates to the selected issue of interest (infection control and patient safety) since it helps understand the impact that the infection prevention and control measures that were used for Covid-19 had on other hospital-acquired infections. The research was reviewed and approved by the institution’s review board. It also respected human subjects by ensuring autonomy, privacy, and respect for human dignity.	I chose this article to create an understanding of the clinical issue of infection from the perspective of the infection control prevention professionals themselves, the healthcare workers. The article relates to the clinical infection control issue since understanding healthcare workers’ perceptions of infection control would help improve the current infection prevention and control practices. The autonomy and privacy of the participants were maintained.	The major reason for selecting this article is because it focuses on infection prevention in the operating room, one of the major areas of infection. Infections in this environment pose a major threat to patient safety. Research ethics was maintained through respect for the human dignity of the study participants.	The reason for selecting this article is because non-critical environments, surfaces and equipment in healthcare facilities also potentially infect patients and care providers. However, more infection prevention and control focus is given to critical environments. Autonomy and privacy were ensured for the study participants. The research results were also shared with participant facilities to ensure research ethics.
Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article	The aim of the research was to evaluate the impact of infection prevention and control measures originally designed for Covid-19 on other hospital-acquired infections.	The main aim of the research in the article was to determine the perception of infection control professionals and other stakeholders on the certification of infection prevention and control in institutions. Thus supporting and enhancing certification.	This study aimed to identify infection prevention best practice guidelines that can be used in the operation environment to promote patient safety. Current guidelines were reviewed to produce a new guidance statement.	The aim of this research was to compile a comprehensive approach to facilitate effective surface cleaning and disinfection in healthcare facilities.
Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.	The research methodology used in this article is quantitative. The data collected is numerical and statistical analysis. The incidence-rate-ratio was used to compare the rate of hospital-acquired infections after using the new infection prevention and control measures.	The research methodology in this article is a mixed method. Data was collected and analyzed using both qualitative and quantitative methods, including interviews and surveys. The quantitative data were analyzed using the Likert scale, while the qualitative data used thematic analysis.	The research methodology used in this article is qualitative. The research team made observations on the healthcare professionals working in the operating room. The data was analyzed using content analysis.	The research methodology in this article is mixed. Data was collected from different healthcare facilities using surveys. The surveys contained quantitative and qualitative data, which were analyzed using descriptive and thematic analysis.
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.	The methodologies used in this article enhanced the objectivity and accuracy of the results since few variables were involved. The other strength is that the analysis was expressed clearly, thus creating more reliable results. The incident-rate-ratio is a reliable and valid measure when comparing infection rates.	The mixed methodology used in this article allowed perspectives from both qualitative and quantitative data, thus, more detailed results. It also provided generalizable, easily applicable data. The research tools were tested to ensure validity and reliability before the actual data collection.	The research methodology and observation made the research work easier for the researchers. The other strength is that the observation method enabled the researchers to capture new practices. The reliability of the observation was ensured by comparing observers’ results. The validity application is not mentioned.	The mixed methodology enabled the researchers to gain deeper insight into the issue by collecting both qualitative and quantitative data. In addition, the data collected was easily replicable and easy to compile to the comprehensive bundle approach containing best practices.
General Notes/Comments	The new multimodal infection prevention and control measures developed for Covid-19 were advantageous for other hospital-acquired infections. The infection prevention and control strategies should continue even after the pandemic.	Healthcare professionals, who are the major stakeholders in infection prevention and control in their institutions, support infection control best practices. Healthcare stakeholders believe all healthcare providers should have infection control skills.	The article supports infection control and prevention best practices. Infection prevention practices should be more rampant in the operating environment.	The compiled bundle entailed creating policy procedures, selecting appropriate cleaning/disinfecting products, educating staff, monitoring compliance, and implementing room decontamination technologies. Infection prevention and control measures in non-critical environments are vital.