NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation: Weight Loss Program Evaluation Sample Paper

Introduction

Over time, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has involved different health stakeholders in evaluating health programs since evaluation enhances achieving the desired outcomes. Weight Loss Program is one of the health programs that has been subjected to several evaluations to ensure that individuals lose exercise weight. Have a look at NURS 6050: Global Healthcare Comparison Matrix and Narrative Statement.

The program focuses on human behavior, such as eating habits that can help one lose excess body weight. More than 95% of Americans have achieved their weight targets after the weight loss program has been evaluated regularly (Guan et al., 2018). In this context, the objective of this discussion is to assess weight loss program evaluation in the state of Illinois.

ARE YOU STUCK WITH THIS NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation? ORDER NOW!

Outcomes of the Program Evaluation

Evaluating the weight loss program in Illinois State has improved individuals’ health as many people have lost excess weight. There is overwhelming evidence that different health care, such as Northwestern Memorial Hospital, have recorded few cases of excessive body weight complications.

Obesity is one of the diseases associated with excess weight, and it is evident that few Illinois people have been diagnosed with the disease (Hendrie et al., 2020). Before program evaluation was carried out, hospitals in Illinois received many patients suffering from excessive weight complications. Osteoarthritis and Coronary heart attacks are some of the common diseases that affected people of Illinois before the weight loss program was initiated.  

Measures of Success

All healthcare organizations in Illinois have recorded low patient outcomes since most individuals are keen on their diet and physical exercise that generally supports health. Health records showing low patient outcomes clearly indicate that the program evaluation was successful. Also, the program was successful because the evaluation was conducted at the initial implementation stage, which is easy to make adjustments.

According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, most health program evaluations are successful because they are conducted at the initial stages of implementation, allowing stakeholders to make necessary adjustments for the easy achievement of desired goals (Hendrie et al., 2020). With these records, it is evident that approximately 90% of the population of Illinois was reached out and informed about the program evaluation.  

Data Deployed

The program evaluation used both qualitative and quantitative data as they enhanced effectiveness. Qualitative data was the patients’ records who had suffered from overweight diseases. In contrast, the quantitative data compared the patient outcomes in different health before the evaluation and after the assessment. It is important to note that deploying both qualitative and quantitative any health-related program evaluation enhances quality outcomes since the evaluation captures all factors likely to affect the program.

Stakeholders Identified

The weight loss evaluation program involved several stakeholders from within Illinois. Healthcare providers, policymakers, patients, and funding agencies were the stakeholders. Patients and funding agencies are the most beneficiaries of this program for the following reasons: the program helped the patients understand the meals to consume to cut weight and different physical exercises that helped them lose excess weight.

For example, losing weight is of great significance to patients since it helps them avoid chronic diseases such as obesity. In other words, patients would lead a healthy life because of this program. Funding agencies are also the most beneficiaries of this program since they will make huge profits since all set goals are achieved. For instance, the health care department will likely give other programs the funding agencies to run, thus making huge profits.

Objectives of the Program

All the original intended objectives were achieved because the health of the people of Illinois improved. After people lost excess weight, healthcare organizations in Illinois recorded a low number of patients with overweight-related health complications. After program evaluation, a survey was also conducted to check whether program objectives were achieved. The survey found that less than 2% of the Illinois population was overweight (Thorning et al., 2018). This shows that most of the population is healthy, and thus, the program objectives were achieved. The program achieved all the set objectives because of the effective stakeholders and strategies that were used.

Recommendations

I would highly recommend this program to my workplace because it enhances the achievement of all desired goals. The program would be beneficial to both individuals and organizations because employees will be in a position to achieve their personal goals, and at the same time, the organization will also achieve its goals.  

Involvement in the Program

As a nurse advocate, I could be involved in the program after implementation by taking part in the survey to check the effectiveness of the program. Secondly, I could involve myself in the program by forming alternative policies integrated into pre-existing policies to achieve the desired outcomes.  

Conclusion

Illinois is one of the states that conducted weight loss program evaluations to improve the health and well-being of its residents. The program involved different stakeholders who ensured that the program achieved all its objectives. Patient outcome was used as a measure of success. The program deployed both qualitative and quantitative data for quality purposes. I would recommend this program as it enhances the achievement of both individual and organizational goals.

References

Guan, W., Thaw, A., N. Grondhuis, S., & Schaechter, A. (2018). Evaluation of a Commercial Telehealth Weight Loss and Management Program. Journal Of Nutrition & Weight Loss, 03(02). https://doi.org/10.35248/2593-9793.18.3.114

Hendrie, G., Baird, D., Brindal, E., Williams, G., Brand-Miller, J., & Muhlhausler, B. (2020). Weight loss and usage of an online commercial weight loss program delivered in an everyday context: A 5-year evaluation of the CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet Online (Preprint). Journal Of Medical Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.2196/20981

Thorning, T., Fabre, O., Legrand, R., Astrup, A., & Hjorth, M. (2018). Weight loss and weight loss maintenance efficacy of a novel weight loss program: The retrospective RNPC ® cohort. Obesity Medicine, 10, 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obmed.2018.05.001

NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Instructions

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

ARE YOU STUCK WITH THIS NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation? ORDER NOW!

Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
  • Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
  • Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
  • How was the success of the program or policy measured?
  • How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
  • How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
  • At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
  • What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
  • What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
  • What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
  • Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
  • Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
  • Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

NURS 6050 Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Example 2

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis  Template  

Use this document to complete the Module 5 Assessment Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation.

Healthcare Program/Policy EvaluationImproving Patient Safety Through Wearable Devices  
DescriptionThe wearable technology project was launched in the health organization last year. The healthcare program’s objective was to diminish patient falls within an inpatient environment by utilizing wearable technology. The primary goal is to elevate patient safety, enhance mobility, and lower healthcare expenses linked to fall-induced injuries.
How was the success of the program or policy measured?  The effectiveness of the program was evaluated by comparing fall rates before and after implementation, analyzing patient satisfaction surveys, and monitoring compliance rates with the wearable technology. In addition to these quantitative measures, qualitative data on the program’s success was gathered through regular audits and feedback sessions.
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?The program was able to study 215 in-patients who are considered high-risk, including older individuals and those with long-term health issues that impact their ability to move around.  
At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conductedThe program evaluation took place at various stages, starting with an initial review at the six-month mark to implement any needed changes, followed by a thorough assessment after one year to evaluate the overall effectiveness and results in detail.
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?The evaluation process involved analyzing fall incident reports, patient health records, data from wearable devices, surveys completed by patients and staff, as well as feedback from healthcare providers.
What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?Some patients initially resisted the wearable technology, there were technical problems with device connectivity, and nurses faced a heavier workload during the initial training and adaptation period.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.  The stakeholders involved in this initiative encompassed patients, healthcare providers, correctional facility administrators, and technology vendors. Patients experienced the greatest advantages through decreased fall hazards and enhanced safety, while healthcare providers acquired valuable knowledge about effective fall prevention tactics. The facility administrators realized the benefits of lowered healthcare expenses and improved health outcomes for in-patients. As an illustration, policymakers utilized the assessment findings to support ongoing investment in the program.
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?  Yes, the program successfully achieved its initial goals and objectives by effectively decreasing fall incidents, enhancing patient safety and mobility, and proving to be cost-effective. This accomplishment can be attributed to thorough planning, involving stakeholders, and the efficient utilization of wearable technology.
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?  Owing to the program’s success in fulfilling its initial goals, I propose its integration into various environments, such as homes (Warrington et al., 2021). The program’s ability to decrease falls, improve patient safety, and produce financial savings underscores its capacity for wider utilization (Pech et al., 2021). Settings such as nursing homes and other long-term care facilities can benefit from the installation of wearable technologies (O’Connor et al., 2022; Subramaniam et al., 2022).
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.  As a nurse advocate, I could perform subsequent evaluations to collect input from patients and personnel, guaranteeing ongoing enhancement. Moreover, engaging in data examination and reporting would empower me to advocate for policy modifications or additional funding, thereby bolstering the program’s enduring prosperity (Ham-Baloyi, 2022).
General Notes/CommentsThe implementation of wearable technology led to a significant 30% decrease in patient falls among high-risk patients, resulting in improved safety and mobility. Various evaluations conducted throughout the program highlighted its effectiveness and identified areas for enhancement, particularly in addressing initial resistance and technical challenges. Involving key stakeholders proved to be crucial in realizing the comprehensive benefits of reduced healthcare costs and improved patient outcomes. Due to its success, it is highly recommended for broader adoption in both home and healthcare environments. As a nurse advocate, continued participation in follow-up assessments and data analysis will play a vital role in refining and ensuring the ongoing success of the program.


References

O’Connor, S., Gasteiger, N., Stanmore, E., Wong, D. C., & Lee, J. J. (2022). Artificial intelligence for falls management in older adult care: A scoping review of nurses’ role. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(8), 3787–3801. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13853

Pech, M., Sauzeon, H., Yebda, T., Benois-Pineau, J., & Amieva, H. (2021). Falls detection and prevention systems in-home care for older adults: Myth or reality? JMIR Aging, 4(4), e29744. https://doi.org/10.2196/29744

Subramaniam, S., Faisal, A. I., & Deen, M. J. (2022). Wearable sensor systems for fall risk assessment: A review. Frontiers in Digital Health, 4, 921506. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2022.921506

Ham-Baloyi, W. (2022). Nurses’ roles in changing practice through implementing best practices: A systematic review. Health SA Gesondheid, 27. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v27i0.1776

Warrington, D. J., Shortis, E. J., & Whittaker, P. J. (2021). Are wearable devices effective for preventing and detecting falls: an umbrella review (a review of systematic reviews). BMC Public Health, 21(1), 2091. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12169-7