NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools – Step-by-Step Guide with Sample Solution

The first step before starting to write the NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose to help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last five years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, to save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools

Objectives:

1. Describe effective strategies to create an evidence-based practice culture within a health care setting.
2. Identify stakeholders needed for the evidence-based practice project.
3. Assess organizational readiness for the evidence-based practice project.

NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1

Assessment Description

Compare two organizational readiness tools. Identify the tool you selected and explain why it is most appropriate for assessing your organization. Have a look at NUR 590 Topic 2 Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness.

NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1 Compare Two Organizational Readiness Tools Example

Organizational Readiness Tools

Organizational readiness tools are frameworks used to assess and enhance an institution’s preparedness for change. According to Gabutti et al. (2022), organizational readiness tools are used by leaders and administrators in the institution to ensure the successful implementation of new practices or innovations. They can also be used to assess how prepared an organization is to implement an intervention or new initiative, pointing out the barriers and enablers, hence improving the chances of successful and sustainable implementation.

Various organizational readiness tools can be applied in healthcare institutions to assess the readiness for change and promote successful change. This discussion compares two organizational readiness tools that can be used to evaluate readiness in my organization and determines which of the two tools I will use for readiness assessment, justifying why it is most appropriate for assessing my organization.

Among the organizational readiness tools that can be employed to assess readiness for change in my institution are the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) and the Healthcare Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment (HORC). Both organizational readiness assessment tools are designed to assess an organization’s preparedness to implement change, with the primary goal of identifying facilitators and barriers that could affect successful change. Both tools are also used by organizations as they prepare to implement planned change, rather than evaluating general organizational performance or past outcomes.  

However, these organizational readiness tools differ in various ways. The ORIC tool is used to assess the determinants and consequences of organizational readiness for change. Batterham et al. (2024) note that the ORIC tool measures the psychological aspects of readiness, focusing on change commitment, staff motivation to engage in change, and change efficacy, the collective belief in the staff’s ability to implement change successfully. On the other hand, the HORC tool assesses organizational readiness by evaluating factors associated with change, including leadership support, communication pathways, staff training, capacity, culture, and availability of the necessary resources for change.

The ORIC tool measures organizational readiness using a 12-item, psychometrically validated questionnaire, whereas the HORC tool is more comprehensive, encompassing additional domains, including organizational culture and leadership. While ORIC assesses organizational readiness through the perspectives of individual staff members, HORC is conducted at the organizational or team level (Vaishnavi & Suresh, 2021). Additionally, the ORIC tool is used to assess organizational readiness before implementing a specific change, whereas the HORC tool evaluates organizational readiness before implementing quality improvement efforts.

Based on the similarities and differences between the two organizational readiness tools, I will use the HORC tool to conduct my organization’s readiness assessment. The tool is most appropriate for my organization since it is more comprehensive compared to the ORIC tool. The HORC tool will help assess the organization’s infrastructure, including the availability of training resources, leadership support, and communication structures, to facilitate change and provide more robust results on change readiness. In addition, the HORC tool is best suited for my organization’s assessment, as it will help determine whether the system is practically prepared to support change implementation, as opposed to the ORIC tool, which only considers individual staff perspectives.

Both ORIC and HORC serve the shared purpose of assessing organizational readiness for change, hence helping them prepare effectively for successful change. They achieve this by offering structured assessments, supporting informed decision-making, and promoting readiness at both the individual and organizational levels. The HORC tool is the best fit for my organization.

References

Batterham, P., Allenhof, C., Cerga Pashoja, A., Etzelmueller, A., Fanaj, N., Finch, T., Freund, J., Hanssen, D., Mathiasen, K., Piera Jiminez, J., Qirjako, G., Rapley, T., Sacco, Y., Samalin, L., Schuurmans, J., van Genugten, C., & Vis, C. (2024). Psychometric properties of two implementation measures: Normalization Measure Development questionnaire (NoMAD) and organizational readiness for implementing change (ORIC). Implementation Research and Practice, 5, 26334895241245448. https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895241245448     

Gabutti, I., Colizzi, C., & Sanna, T. (2023). Assessing organizational readiness to change through a framework applied to hospitals. Publsic Organization Review, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00628-7

Vaishnavi, V., & Suresh, M. (2022). Assessment of healthcare organizational readiness for change: A fuzzy logic approach. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 34(3), 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.09.008   

NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 2

Assessment Description

Do you foresee any issues with the proposed implementation of your project? Identify a strategy to help create or sustain a higher level of readiness to change with your organization and discuss how current research or literature will be used to ensure that change is based on current evidence.

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Organizational Culture and Readiness

Benchmark

Assessment Description

In order to successfully implement a change within an organization, the change agent must assess the organization’s culture and readiness for change. In 750-1,000 words, analyze the culture and level of readiness of the organization for which your evidence-based practice project is proposed. You will use the assessment of the organization’s culture and readiness in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Include the following:

1. Describe the organization’s culture and explain to what degree the culture supports change. Consider organizational and leadership structure, mission and values, interprofessional collaboration/team engagement, communication, perception of the organization by employees, etc.
2. Select an organizational readiness tool and assess the level or readiness for change within your organization. Identify the readiness tool and summarize the survey results. Discuss the degree to which the culture will support and sustain an evidence-based practice change. Consider strengths and weaknesses, potential barriers, stakeholder support, timing of the proposal, and resources. Provide rationale.
3. Discuss what health care process and systems you would recommend for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness for the organization.
4. Propose strategies to better facilitate the readiness of the organization.
5. Identify the stakeholders and team members for the project. Include what their duties will be in the evidence-based practice project proposal.
6. Explain what information and communication technologies are needed for the implementation and how they will be integrated in the setting by the internal stakeholders. Explain how these will help improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations for your intervention.

Refer to the “evidence-based practice project proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite a minimum four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

3.1:  Assess health care processes and systems to recommend measures for improving quality, safety, and cost-effectiveness across an organization.

3.3:  Integrate appropriate information and communication technologies to improve nursing practice and care delivery for individuals and populations.