NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table

NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table Instructions

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

This assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (published within the past 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Read NRS 465 Topic 5 dq 1 Based on your assessment, identify two internal and two external stakeholders.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Attachments

NRS-465-T4-RS-Literature Evaluation Table.docx

NRS 465 Literature Evaluation Table Example

Student Name: CK

Faculty Name: JC

Finalized PICOT Question: “In densely populated communities (P), how does the implementation of contact tracing (I) compared to no contact tracing (C) affect the transmission of the Coronavirus (O) over a period of six months (T)?”

Literature Search Strategy Employed (in 100 words or less describe the library databases that you searched and the keywords that you used to find research articles):

Criteria	Article 1	Article 2	Article 3	Article 4
APA Reference All peer reviewed journal articles should be current (published within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. Include the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.	Juneau, C. E., Briand, A. S., Collazzo, P., Siebert, U., & Pueyo, T. (2023). Effective contact tracing for COVID-19: A systematic review. Global epidemiology, 5, 100103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100103	Thomas Craig, K. J., Rizvi, R., Willis, V. C., Kassler, W. J., & Jackson, G. P. (2021). Effectiveness of Contact Tracing for Viral Disease Mitigation and Suppression: Evidence-Based Review. JMIR public health and surveillance, 7(10), e32468. https://doi.org/10.2196/32468	Stroebe, W., vanDellen, M. R., Abakoumkin, G., Lemay, E. P., Jr, Schiavone, W. M., Agostini, M., Bélanger, J. J., Gützkow, B., Kreienkamp, J., Reitsema, A. M., Abdul Khaiyom, J. H., Ahmedi, V., Akkas, H., Almenara, C. A., Atta, M., Bagci, S. C., Basel, S., Berisha Kida, E., Bernardo, A. B. I., Buttrick, N. R., … Leander, N. P. (2021). Politicization of COVID-19 health-protective behaviors in the United States: Longitudinal and cross-national evidence. PloS one, 16(10), e0256740. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256740	Chu, D. K., Akl, E. A., Duda, S., Solo, K., Yaacoub, S., Schünemann, H. J., & COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors (2020). Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet (London, England), 395(10242), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9
Purpose/Aim of Study	Comprehend the importance of contact tracing in managing the spread of COVID-19 within densely populated areas.	Assess the efficacy of different contact tracing methods by critically analyzing recent scholarly literature.	Analyze the advantages and constraints of various research methodologies utilized in studies pertaining to contact tracing for COVID-19.	Recognize the influence of political factors on health-protective behaviors and public health measures amid the pandemic.
Research questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)	The hypothesis of this article is that the study’s endeavor to amalgamate existing material and provide a comprehensive implementation guide justifies its significance.	The hypothesis of this article is that the study’s practical perspectives emphasize its significant pertinence, providing enlightening data that bridges the divide between theoretical considerations and practical implementations.	The hypothesis of this article is to examines the impact of political matters on individuals’ efforts to safeguard their health during the COVID-19 pandemic.	The hypothesis of this article is the systematic review and meta-analysis provide a comprehensive viewpoint on strategies to mitigate the transmission of COVID 19.
Design Type of quantitative or type of qualitative study design	Systematic Review	Evidence-Based Review	Longitudinal Study	Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
Setting Where did the study take place? What type of setting – inpatient, outpatient, etc.?	Long Term Care Facility	Long Term Care Facility	Acute Care Hospital	Acute Care Hospital
Sample Number and characteristics of participants	Sample 20 participant	Sample 20 participant	Sample 16 participant	Sample 20 participant
Methods Interventions/Instruments	Facilitating communication between healthcare personnel and individuals diagnosed with COVID-19	Pre-intervention and post-intervention groups	Individualized interventions and exercise program	Individualized Interventions
Analysis How were the data that were collected analyzed?	Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS)	Pre-intervention and post-intervention groups	SPSS	Meta-analysis provides empirical evidence that supports the implementation of physical distancing measures of at least 1 meter or more. It also offers quantitative estimates for models and contact tracing, which can be used to inform policy decisions.
Outcomes/key findings of the study and implications for nursing practice (Summary of study results)	The systematic review enhances the field by offering a comprehensive perspective on effective contact tracing strategies through the consolidation of valuable insights from various sources.	The study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of contact tracing in reducing viral illness, even when using a moderate sample size.	The study’s focus on understanding the sociocultural factors that impact public health measures explains its moderate significance. An understanding of the challenges involved in implementing and promoting health-protective measures is greatly enhanced by the understanding of how partisanship influences health behaviors	The study’s relevance lies in its thorough evaluation of preventive measures such as maintaining physical distance, using eye protection, and wearing face masks.
Recommendations of the Researcher	The review provides policymakers and public health professionals with evidence-based recommendations to optimize contact tracing efforts. Its presentation of high-quality information. makes it a valuable resource	Enhanced knowledge among practice nurses’ results in heightened effectiveness of prevention strategies for contact tracing, leading to a valuable enhancement in reducing viral infections.	The high-quality evidence from this longitudinal study adds credibility to its results, making it a valuable resource for policymakers navigating the complex connection between politics and public health	The exceptional research provides evidence-based insights into the effectiveness of these strategies, thereby enhancing its contribution to the field
Explain how this article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project	The article employs empirical data to formulate recommendations for patients regarding the overarching investigation into the efficacy of contact tracing for COVID-19.	The study remains valuable despite the moderate quality of the evidence, as it offers valuable insights that can enhance contact tracing protocols in real-world scenarios.	The large number of contacts and the possibility of fast spread make contact tracing difficult in densely populated areas. Nevertheless, it has the potential to be highly effective if executed correctly, as it can detect and isolate new cases rapidly, thereby interrupting the transmission chain.	These findings can inform public health interventions aimed at mitigating person-to-person transmission, as directed by policymakers and medical professionals.

Criteria	Article 5	Article 6	Article 7	Article 8
APA Reference (include the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article)	Braithwaite, I., Callender, T., Bullock, M., & Aldridge, R. W. (2020). Automated and partly automated contact tracing: a systematic review to inform the control of COVID-19. The Lancet. Digital health, 2(11), e607–e621. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30184-9	Rahmani, A. M., & Mirmahaleh, S. Y. H. (2021). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) prevention and treatment methods and effective parameters: A systematic literature review. Sustainable cities and society, 64, 102568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102568	Ki, H. K., Han, S. K., Son, J. S., & Park, S. O. (2019). Risk of transmission via medical employees and importance of routine infection-prevention policy in a nosocomial outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): a descriptive analysis from a tertiary care hospital in South Korea. BMC pulmonary medicine, 19(1), 190. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-019-0940-5	Shelby, T., Arechiga, C., Gupta, A. J., Hennein, R., Schenck, C., Weeks, B., Bond, M., Niccolai, L., Davis, J. L., & Grau, L. E. (2022). “I can’t do it”: A qualitative study exploring case and contact experiences with COVID-19 contact tracing. BMC public health, 22(1), 1963. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14265-8
Purpose/Aim of Study	Examine the function of technology in the automated process of contact tracing and its possible impact on the management of COVID-19.	Acknowledge the subjective observations regarding personal encounters with COVID-19 contact tracing and their significance for public health tactics.	Acquire an extensive comprehension of infection prevention policies, specifically in healthcare environments, through the analysis of pertinent research.	The study’s significant pertinence is emphasized by its concentration on the human dimension of contact tracing, encompassing the personal encounters and obstacles encountered.
Research questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)	The research question for this article is, “how Automated and Semi-Automated Contact Tracing should be guide when controlling COVID-19’’	The hypothesis of this article is a comprehensive understanding of the methodologies used for treatment and prevention	This article is hypothesis with the moderate relevance of the study can be attributed to the fact that it focuses on infection prevention practices in hospital environments.	The hypothesis of this article is exploring personal encounters with COVID-19 contact tracing, providing qualitative observations on difficulties and perspectives.
Design Type of quantitative or type of qualitative study design	Systematic Review	Systematic Literature Review	Descriptive Analysis	Quantitative Study
Setting Where did the study take place? What type of setting – inpatient, outpatient, etc.?	Long Term Facility	Acute Care Hospital	Acute Care Hospital	Acute Care Hospital
Sample Number and characteristics of participants	Sample 25	Sample 16	Sample 40	Sample 20
Methods Interventions/Instruments	Individualized intervention	Individualized intervention	Individualized Intervention group	Individual experiences shaping contact tracing strategies.
Analysis How was the data that were collected analyzed?	SPSS	Pre-intervention and post- intervention	Pre-intervention and post- intervention	SPSS
Outcomes/key findings of the study and implications for nursing practice (Summary of study results)	The study’s notable significance stems from its exploration of innovative methods to enhance contact tracing programs. The study’s significance is not diminished by the moderate level of evidence; instead, it underscores the necessity for further investigation in the rapidly evolving domain of technology-driven public health initiatives.	Despite the moderate quality of the data, this study makes a noteworthy contribution to the field. It serves as a valuable resource for policymakers and healthcare practitioners seeking evidence-based insights into COVID-19 prevention and therapy.	The study highlights the significance of regular infection prevention measures by offering insightful information on the dangers connected to nosocomial outbreaks, even though the quality of the data is only modest.	The study’s significant pertinence is emphasized by its concentration on the human dimension of contact tracing, encompassing the personal encounters and difficulties encountered.
Recommendations of the Researcher	The contributions made by the study are extremely important for the authorities who are interested in incorporating technological advancements into their contact tracing procedures.	Offers a comprehensive evaluation of relevant factors while analyzing measures to prevent and treat COVID-19.	Healthcare practitioners and policymakers can utilize these insights to enhance infection control protocols in healthcare settings.	Policymakers and public health practitioners can utilize these qualitative insights to customize contact tracing strategies to correspond with the requirements and apprehensions of the community more effectively.
Explain how this article supports your proposed PICO(T) question and Capstone Change Project	The article focuses on the application of systematic review to examine technology-based strategies for controlling COVID-19, specifically automated and semi-automated contact tracing methods.	The incorporation of a diverse array of literature in the study showcases its significant pertinence, providing a thorough understanding of preventive and therapeutic approaches.	These insights can be used by healthcare practitioners and policymakers to improve infection control protocols in healthcare settings.	Even studies with a moderate level of evidence, such as evidence-based reviews and qualitative studies, provide distinct viewpoints that enhance the collective knowledge.

Reference

Basseal, J. M., Bennett, C. M., Collignon, P., Currie, B. J., Durrheim, D. N., Leask, J., McBryde, E. S., McIntyre, P., Russell, F. M., Smith, D. W., Sorrell, T. C., & Marais, B. J. (2023). Key lessons from the COVID-19 public health response in Australia. The Lancet Regional Health – Western Pacific, 30, [100616]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100616

 ECDC Contact tracing: public health management of persons, including healthcare workers, having had contact with COVID-19 cases in the European Union – second update. 2020 April 8. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/Contact-tracing-Public-health-management-persons-including-healthcare-workers-having-had-contact-with-COVID-19-cases-in-the-European-Union%E2%80%93second-update_0.pdf

Hossain AD, Jarolimova J, Elnaiem A, Huang CX, Richterman A, Ivers LC. 2022. Effectiveness of contact tracing in the control of infectious diseases: a systematic review. Lancet Public Health 7, e259-ee73. ( 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00001-9

JE McKenzie, Brennan S.E. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.2 (updated February 2021). Cochrane. JPT Higgins, Thomas J., Chandler J., Cumpston M., Li T., Page M.J., et al., editors. 2021. Chapter 12: Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods.

Juneau C.E., Pueyo T., Bell M., Gee G., Collazzo P., Potvin L. Lessons from past pandemics: a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19. Syst Rev. 2022 May 12;11(1):90.    

Nachega J.B., Grimwood A., Mahomed H., et al. From easing lockdowns to scaling-up community-based covid-19 screening, testing, and contact tracing in Africa – shared approaches, innovations, and challenges to minimize morbidity and mortality [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 31] Clin Infect Dis. 2020

Pozo-Martin F, Beltran Sanchez MA, Muller SA, Diaconu V, Weil K, El Bcheraoui C. 2023. Comparative effectiveness of contact tracing interventions in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 38, 1-24.

Shearer FM et al. 2023. Estimating the impact of test-trace-isolate-quarantine systems on SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Australia. medRxiv.

WHO Public health criteria to adjust public health and social measures in the context of COVID-19. 2020 May 12. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332073/WHO-2019-nCoV-Adjusting_PH_measures-Criteria-2020.1-eng.pdf

Wong S.Y.S., Kwok K.O., Chan F.K.L. What can countries learn from Hong Kong’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic? CMAJ. 2020;192(19):E511-E515.