NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to complete the DNP Practicum Readiness Form (located in the DNP Project & Practicum Resources section of the Student Resource Center) in preparation for the practicum courses. The Practicum Readiness Form must be completed entirely because the information will be needed to write the project plan, complete the institutional review board application, and implement the DNP practice change project. Have a look at NR730 Week 4 Discussion | The Connection Between Practice Problems, Evidence and Interventions.

Successful completion of this form is required to enroll in NR711.

Instructions

Complete all pages entirely with sufficient detail, paying attention to the following:

  1. Page 1
    1. If some information does not apply, such as the mentor information, enter Not Applicable. Be sure to answer the questions at the bottom of the page with the check-boxes.
  2. Page 2
    1. Answer all questions and sub-questions. If a sub-question is not completed, the form is considered incomplete.
    2. Enter complete APA references for 5 contemporary research articles (< 5 years old).
      1. A minimum of 2 articles should be related to your practice problem.
      2. A minimum of 3 articles related to your evidence-based intervention.
      3. The form is considered incomplete with less than 2 articles for the practice problem and 3 articles supporting the evidence-based intervention.
  3. Page 3
    1. Explain the steps in your intervention implementation plan in detail so that the reader can implement the same intervention by following your plan’s exact steps.
    2. Examine the feasibility of implementing your project in 8-12 weeks.
    3. Analyze the barriers you anticipate and the strategies to overcome or mitigate the barriers.
  4. Page 4
    1. Explain your data collection plan and process fully so that the reader can replicate the data collection process exactly.
      1. State the outcome(s) you will measure and the data collection process pre-implementation and process post-implementation.
      2. Explain your data analysis plan and the statistical tests you will use to evaluate the outcome data. Importantly, you must complete the two questions with check boxes at the bottom of the page.
 Important

You are expected to use your course faculty feedback on this draft assignment to revise your work for the final submission of this assignment in Week 5. The final submission of this assignment in Week 5 is a pass/fail assignment. If the form is completed entirely for the Week 5 assignment, all points will be awarded.

Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program outcomes:

  1. Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
  2. Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
  3. Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
  4. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
  5. Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
  6. Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
  7. Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

2. Apply clinical scholarship methodologies for designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating quality improvements and the translation of evidence-based practice, to improve healthcare outcomes at the micro, meso, or macrosystem level. (PCs 1, 3, 5; POs 3, 5, 9) 

3. Appraise and synthesize the highest level of evidence available to improve the quality, cost-effectiveness, and healthcare outcomes of diverse populations. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8; POs 4, 5, 6, 8) 

NR730 Week 3 Assignment: Draft DNP Practicum Readiness Form Example

The Impact of Behavioral Parent Training on Impairment Rating Scale Scores in Children with ADHD

Issue Identified by Decision Makers

Following interactions with decision-makers at the pediatric outpatient mental health clinic, they identified a need for increasing attention and cognitive performance in children aged 8 to 12 with ADHD. They have expressed interest in using EndeavorRx, a digital therapeutic game, as a cutting-edge, research-based strategy to support their current procedures. This DNP practicum project aims to incorporate EndeavorRx into the clinic’s current treatment plan and evaluate its effectiveness in improving cognitive outcomes for these children.

Translation Science Model: Knowledge to Action (KTA) model

Problem Statement

Children with ADHD have significantly lower cognitive functioning and quality of life, affecting their academic performance and interpersonal interactions (Bong & Kim, 2021). The current therapies for children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder may not completely meet their unique cognitive needs, resulting in ongoing attention and mental abilities challenges. Despite receiving standard care, many children with ADHD struggle with these issues (Storebà¸, 2019).

Therefore, a shift in practice is necessary to incorporate novel interventions that can effectively enhance cognitive and attentional functioning in this population. EndeavorRx, a digital therapy game, is one such intervention that has demonstrated promising effects in enhancing cognitive outcomes for kids with ADHD (Kollins et al., 2020). By implementing these novel approaches, we can better address the mental challenges faced by children with ADHD.

Need for change

Controlling ADHD is becoming more urgent worldwide due to its high occurrence and challenges to children’s cognitive development and overall well-being (Sandstrom et al., 2021). An increased focus is being placed on incorporating cutting-edge, empirically supported interventions that can support conventional therapies and improve the cognitive results of kids with ADHD (Chiu et al., 2023).

Decision-makers at our practicum site have recognized the need to enhance the cognitive and attentional abilities of children with ADHD. Based on the possible advantages suggested by recent research, they have expressed interest in introducing EndeavorRx, a digital therapeutic game that can supplement their current procedures (Kollins et al., 2020). As a result, we need to investigate and implement such interventions at our facility, which aligns with a global shift toward cutting-edge, evidence-based methods for controlling ADHD.

The Purpose of the Proposed Project

The proposed DNP project aims to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of the digital therapeutic game EndeavorRx in improving attention and cognitive functioning in children aged 8 to 12 years diagnosed with ADHD who attend an outpatient mental health clinic. The project aims to improve the cognitive results for this pediatric population by supplementing conventional therapeutic strategies with this novel, evidence-based intervention.

PICOT QUESTION

For children aged 12 years or younger diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, does behavioral parent training (BPT), compared to current practice, impact impairment rating scale scores within 8-10 weeks?

Population description

This project’s population comprises children aged 8 to 12 years diagnosed with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). These children are currently undergoing treatment at the outpatient mental health clinic where this study will be executed. The planned participant size for this project is 50 children. The clinic’s capacity, the frequency of ADHD among its pediatric clientele, and the parents’ or guardians’ willingness to grant permission for their children’s participation all played a role in determining this number.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Children between the ages of 8 and 12.
  2. Having been given an ADHD diagnosis by a medical expert.
  3. Currently under treatment at an outpatient mental health center.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Children outside the age range of 8 to 12 years.
  2. Children who have co-occurring severe mental health issues that would preclude the intervention from being used or evaluated.
  3. Kids whose guardians refuse to permit them to participate.
Explanation of the Intervention

In this project, EndeavorRx, a digital therapeutic game, will be part of the treatment plan for children diagnosed with ADHD. According to Kollins et al. (2020), EndeavorRx was created to target and enhance attention function in kids with ADHD. EndeavorRx, according to Jurigova et al. (2021), is an online therapy game made to help children with ADHD focus better. It utilizes a customized, adaptable algorithm that adjusts the game’s difficulty according to the child’s performance, fostering long-term engagement and cognitive skill development.

EndeavorRx has shown positive results in improving attention and executive functioning in children with ADHD. To implement this intervention, children diagnosed with ADHD at the outpatient mental health clinic will be introduced to EndeavorRx. Parents or caregivers will receive instructions on downloading and installing the game on their home devices, as well as guidance on how to use it. The kids will be encouraged to play the game for a specific duration each day, following either the manufacturer’s suggestions or the clinic’s guidelines.

The children’s progress during the intervention will be regularly monitored through check-ins with parents or caregivers, who will receive updates. The effectiveness of the intervention will be assessed using various methods. These include electroencephalogram changes, standardized cognitive tests such as the Kingstone cognitive test, rating scales from parents and teachers, and measures of academic performance.

The Variables will be measured before and after the intervention to assess its impact on the individual. The researchers will analyze the results to see how EndeavorRx affects attention function and ADHD symptoms in children with ADHD, as mentioned in the study by Chui et al. (2022). This intervention adheres to the principles of the translational science model, which emphasizes the application of research findings in real-world clinical settings to improve patient outcomes.

Project’s Feasibility

The EndeavorRx intervention can be implemented within 8-10 weeks. In large part, the intervention uses the EndeavorRx game, which can be quickly installed on suitable devices. Due to its simple distribution and use, the digital nature of the game makes it an ideal intervention to implement and monitor during this period.

Nonetheless, it is essential to be aware of the following potential obstacles:

  1. Technological limitations: Some children may not have the necessary technology and internet connection to use EndeavorRx. Not all children may have access to the required technology and internet connection for EndeavorRx. A mitigation strategy may involve collaborating with local organizations or schools to provide the necessary instruments or to facilitate Internet access.
  2. Engagement and Compliance: Children may lose interest in EndeavorRx or cease using it as directed over time. This can be prevented by establishing routine check-ins with parents and children to resolve issues and provide assistance. Adding a rewards system to the game may also be considered to encourage continued use.
  3. Data Collection and Evaluation: Collecting accurate data before and after the intervention might be complex because the study is short. To ensure we gather all the necessary information within the project’s timeframe, it is essential to conduct initial assessments as soon as consent is obtained and schedule post-intervention evaluations in advance.
  4. Parental Support: Parents are crucial to this intervention because they ensure that the EndeavorRx game is regularly played. To ensure parental participation and support, it is vital to provide precise instructions, establish clear expectations from the outset, and maintain open lines of communication.

 We can confidently proceed with the suggested intervention within the 8–10 week window by proactively addressing these potential obstacles and having backup plans in place.

Data Collection Plan

The primary measurable result of this intervention is increased attention and cognitive performance in children with ADHD. The ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV), an electroencephalogram (EEG), and standardized cognitive tests, such as the Kingston Cognition Assessment (KCA), will be the specific tools used for data collection. The well-known and trustworthy ADHD-RS-IV will gauge symptom changes (Mei et al., 2022).

The EEG will provide an objective assessment of changes in brain activity related to attention and cognitive function. The KCA will assess cognitive developments, focusing on attention and executive functioning in particular. Both before and after the EndeavorRx intervention is implemented, data will be collected. Before the intervention begins, baseline data will be collected using the ADHD-RS-IV, EEG, and KCA. Following the intervention, these tests will be administered again to assess changes in ADHD symptoms and cognitive performance.

Measurable Outcome(s) as identified in the PICOT questionData collection process pre- and post-intervention
Reduction in ADHD symptomsThe ADHD-RS-IV will be given to participants before the EndeavorRx intervention is implemented to collect baseline information on ADHD symptoms. To measure any changes in ADHD symptoms, the same assessment will be given after the intervention.
Improvement in cognition and attentionBefore the EndeavorRx intervention, baseline cognition and attention will be assessed using the EEG and KCA. The same evaluations will be used to assess changes in attention and cognitive performance following the intervention.
Data Analysis Plan

Paired sample t-tests will be utilized for data analysis to see whether there is a significant difference in ADHD symptoms and cognitive function before and after the intervention. Comparisons will be made between pre- and post-intervention results on the ADHD-RS-IV and KCA, as well as EEG readings. This strategy will enable a quantitative assessment of EndeavorRx’s efficiency in enhancing cognition and attention in children with ADHD within 8–10 weeks.

References

Bong, S. H., & Kim, J. W. (2021). The role of quantitative electroencephalogram in the diagnosis and subgrouping of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. 32(3), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.210010

Chiu, H.-J., Sun, C.-K., Cheng, Y.-S., Wang, M. Y., Tzang, R.-F., Lin, F.-L., Cheng, Y.-C., & Chung, W. (2023). Efficacy and tolerability of psychostimulants for symptoms of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in preschool children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 66(1), e24. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.11

Jurigova, B. G., Gerdes, M. R., Anguera, J. A., & Marco, E. J. (2021). Sustained benefits of cognitive training in children with inattention, three-year follow-up. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0246449. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246449

Kollins, S. H., DeLoss, D. J., Cañadas, E., Lutz, J., Findling, R. L., Keefe, R. S. E., Epstein, J. N., Cutler, A. J., & Faraone, S. V. (2020). A novel digital intervention for actively reducing severity of paediatric ADHD (STARS-ADHD): A randomized controlled trial. The Lancet Digital Health, 2(4), e168–e178. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30017-0

Mei, H., Xie, R., Li, T., Chen, Z., Liu, Y., & Sun, C. (2022). Effect of atomoxetine on behavioral difficulties and growth development of primary school children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A prospective study. Children, 9(2), 212. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9020212

Sandstrom, A., Perroud, N., Alda, M., Uher, R., & Pavlova, B. (2021). Prevalence of attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder in people with mood disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13283

Storebà¸, O. J. (2019). Methylphenidate benefits and harms in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Two Cochrane systematic reviews. Movement and Nutrition in Health and Disease, 3. https://doi.org/10.5283/mnhd.15