NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution
The first step before starting to write the NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment.
It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.
How to Research and Prepare for NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list.
You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.
How to Write the Body for NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”
How to Write the Conclusion for NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319
Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.
NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship Instructions
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to explore the dissemination of clinical scholarship to foster improvement in the safety and quality of patient-centered care at all system levels. Have a look at NR719 Week 6 Assignment: The Role of the DNP-Prepared Nurse as Mentor.
Instructions
DNP-prepared APNs lead through clinical scholarship which includes writing for publications. Reflect on the lesson and readings this week and respond to the following:
- Identify a scholarly peer-reviewed journal where you would choose to publish your future completed DNP practice change project.
- Differentiate why the selected journal would be an appropriate choice as compared to other professional journals.
- Provide a summary of the author guidelines and manuscript submission requirements for the journal you have chosen.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program outcomes:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Apply leadership practices that support interprofessional collaborative practice and team effectiveness. (PCs 2, 4, 5, 6, 8; POs 2, 4, 6, 8)
- Translate quality improvement initiatives to provide safe and effective patient-centered care. (PCs 1, 3, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 5, 8)
NR719 Week 6 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship Example
The Advanced Practice Nurse and Clinical Scholarship
In the ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, the role of the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)-prepared Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) stands as a pivotal force in shaping the quality and safety of patient-centered care. Brykczynski (2022) states that advanced practice registered nurses are expected to practice, reason, and participate in high-level research activities. Selecting a suitable journal to publish a research project is an essential task, as it determines access by the targeted audience. This discussion aims to explore the dissemination of clinical scholarship to foster improvement in the safety and quality of patient-centered care at all system levels.
For a DNP practice change project focusing on disseminating clinical scholarship to enhance patient-centered care, a suitable scholarly peer-reviewed journal might be the “Journal of Nursing Care Quality.” This journal is known for its emphasis on quality improvement initiatives, patient safety, and evidence-based practice in nursing care (Journal of Nursing Care Quality, n.d.). Additionally, it provides a platform for disseminating scholarly work to foster improvements in patient care at various system levels. However, reviewing the chosen journal’s specific author guidelines and submission requirements is crucial to ensure alignment with your project.
The “Journal of Nursing Care Quality” is an apt choice for disseminating my DNP practice change project due to its explicit focus on nursing care quality, patient safety, and evidence-based practices. Unlike other professional journals, it offers a dedicated platform for in-depth discussions and scholarly work, aiming to foster improvements in patient-centered care across diverse healthcare systems. Its commitment to quality improvement aligns seamlessly with the goals of my project, ensuring a targeted and impactful contribution to the nursing field.
Upholding ethical authorship principles is paramount for fostering a culture of academic integrity. According to the Journal of Nursing Care Quality (n.d.), adhering to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines, authorship should be rooted in substantial contributions, manuscript drafting, final approval, and overall accountability. It is crucial to note that artificial intelligence authoring tools fall short of meeting these criteria. Additionally, authors should be prepared to justify their authorship assignments if the editor requests. Furthermore, adherence to specified manuscript types and guidelines is essential for maintaining the highest academic rigor and honesty standards, as Hastings et al. (2023) show.
Embracing the principles of ethical authorship and adhering to the guidelines set forth by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) not only safeguards the integrity of our scholarly contributions but also reinforces our commitment to advancing healthcare through genuine and innovative research. By prioritizing originality, accountability, and responsible collaboration, we contribute to a robust academic environment that upholds the highest standards of quality and credibility. Let our collective dedication to these principles propel us forward in shaping the future landscape of nursing and patient-centered care.
References
Brykczynski, C. L. M. K. A. (2022). Role development of the advanced practice nurse. Hamric & Hanson’s Advanced Practice Nursing-E-Book: An Integrative Approach, 98.
Hastings, R., Labib, K., Lechner, I., Bouter, L., Widdershoven, G., & Evans, N. (2023). Guidance on research integrity provided by pan-European discipline-specific learned societies: A scoping review. Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac067
Journal of Nursing Care Quality. (n.d.). Online Submission and Review System. https://edmgr.ovid.com/jncq/accounts/ifauth.htm