NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore moral and ethical leadership and its relationship to the courage required during difficult situations. Have a look at NR719 Week 3 Discussion | The Advanced Practice Nurse as a Leader of Interprofessional Teams.

Instructions

Reflect on your readings this week and respond to the following questions.

  1. Analyze strategies that you have used to demonstrate courage to speak up and address difficult situations as a nurse leader.
  2. Examine how your moral and ethical views impacted how you handled the situation.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program outcomes:

  1. Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
  2. Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Apply ethical leadership to the role of the advanced practice nurse. (PCs 7, 8; POs 1, 4)

NR719 Week 2 Discussion | Moral and Ethical Leadership Example

Courageous Strategies to Address Difficult Situations

 As a nurse leader, I have encountered situations where courage was crucial in addressing complex issues. During a staff meeting a few years ago, our nursing supervisor became angered by some staff errors and near misses, so she expressed her frustration by raising her voice and harshly criticizing several staff members. As soon as she began to speak, I noticed a decline in morale. Instead of waiting for someone to speak up, I proactively addressed the issue. I started by acknowledging the challenges we were facing in the facility.

I encouraged our nursing supervisor and other team members to proactively focus on solutions and preventative measures instead of dwelling on the negatives (Angelo, 2019). I encouraged team members to share their concerns and offer evidence-based solutions openly. By normalizing open communication, we identified issues that caused errors, near misses, and dissatisfaction, and collaboratively developed solutions to address them. For instance, we discussed nursing staff shortages, long work hours, stress, burnout, and the need for better resource allocation.

One notable strategy I employed was fostering open communication (Nadkarni et al., 2021). I consider myself an empath, so I always place myself in other individuals’ shoes, even in situations with an underlying challenge. I knew our manager meant well, but she was frustrated and needed help communicating effectively. Transparency is crucial for overcoming miscommunication and ensuring alignment within a team. So, when faced with a challenge, I worked on creating an environment where team members felt comfortable expressing concerns or raising issues without fear of retribution (Lee et al., 2022).

By encouraging transparency, I aimed to address challenges proactively rather than letting them escalate. Another strategy involved leading by example. I understood that my actions set the tone for the team, so I consistently modeled the values and behaviors I expected from others. This meant being accountable for mistakes, acknowledging uncertainties, and, most importantly, addressing issues head-on (Tedone & Lee, 2022). By showing vulnerability, I aimed to foster a culture that valued learning and improvement over blame.

Additionally, I utilized active listening as a strategy to demonstrate courage. During team discussions, I focused on truly understanding the perspectives of others (Butler & Whiting, 2019). This fostered empathy, allowing me to grasp the challenges at hand. I could address concerns more effectively and make informed decisions by acknowledging different viewpoints. In the end, the heated discussion evolved into a proactive meeting where we could develop an evidence-based plan to drive improvement as a collective of staff members. In the end, we can never change the past. However, we have the power to shape the future. So, we must always look to learn from the past to optimize the future.

Moral and Ethical Views Impacted

My moral and ethical views shaped how I handle challenging situations. Like any nurse leader, we must prioritize justice, autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2020). This includes promoting equity, respecting each individual’s rights, achieving good outcomes, and minimizing harm at all times. My top priorities are the quadruple aims, which include improving population health outcomes, patient satisfaction, clinician experience, and efficiency.

Yelling and harsh criticism are personal attacks, so they conflict with the principle of non-maleficence. It negatively affects staff morale and erodes our team cohesion. So, when the staff morale is low because of harsh leadership tied to past mistakes that impacted patient outcomes and satisfaction, it was my moral duty to step in and try to resolve the situation. Rather than adding fuel to the fire, I attempted to de-escalate the situation, help the supervisor calm down, and propose solutions to prevent future errors or near misses that could impact our bottom line (Angelo, 2019).

I led by example by taking responsibility for some of the errors. I noted that my performance could have been better, but I worked as hard as possible to learn, grow, and improve. Above all, accountability is essential for setting the tone and becoming someone others can relate to (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2020). When a patient safety incident occurred, I took responsibility, openly admitted to my role in the oversight, and discussed the steps I would take to prevent such an incident from recurring. This act of accountability set the tone for the team. Several other members followed suit by taking responsibility. This de-escalated the situation and helped us hone in on one solution. Acknowledging mistakes was part of our commitment to continuous improvement.

Upholding patient safety and well-being as my top priorities, I always approach dilemmas with a patient-centered ethical framework. This means that decisions and actions are guided by a commitment to providing the best possible care for patients (Burkhardt & Nathaniel, 2020). To do so, we must first provide the best possible work environment for staff. For instance, when faced with a staffing shortage that impacted the quality of care we could provide, my ethical stance centered on fairness and equitable distribution of resources.

I advocated for solutions, prioritizing patient needs while ensuring the team reasonably distributed the workload. This approach aligned with my ethical principles and contributed to a more cohesive and supportive work environment. My moral compass guides me to consider the long-term impact of decisions on both patients and staff. I consistently strive to foster a culture of trust and collaboration, where everyone feels valued and supported.

References

Angelo, E. (2019). Managing interpersonal conflict: Steps for success. Nursing Management, 50(6), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000558479.54449.ed

Burkhardt, M.A., & Nathaniel, A.K. (2020). Ethics & issues in contemporary nursing: Nursing ethics for the 21st century. Elsevier.

Butler, D. S., & Whiting, S. W. (2019). Perspectives on employee voice: A primer for managers. The Psychologist Manager Journal, 22(3), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1037/mgr0000090

Lee, S. E., Dahinten, V. S., Ji, H., Kim, E., & Lee, H. (2022). Motivators and inhibitors of nurses’ speaking up behaviors: A descriptive qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(10), 3398–3408. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15343

Nadkarni, A., Levy-Carrick, N. C., Kroll, D. S., Gitlin, D., & Silbersweig, D. (2021). Communication and transparency as a means of strengthening workplace culture during COVID-19. NAM Perspectives, 2021, 10.31478/202103a. https://doi.org/10.31478/202103a

Tedone, A. M., & Lee, V.B. (2022). Speaking up at work: Personality’s influence on employee voice behavior. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(2), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-09-2020-2417