NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse, to consider what you learned in this course and how this knowledge will impact your practice. This task marks the end of the NR716 class. The next class is NR703 Applied Organizational & Leadership Concepts, which begins with NR703 Week 1 Discussion 1 | Building Leadership Capacity.

Instructions

Reflective inquiry allows for the expansion of self-awareness, identification of knowledge gaps, and assessment of learning goals. As you reflect on your own readiness for practice as a DNP-prepared nurse, it is important to consider what you learned in this course.

As you review the course outcomes and your experience in this course, address the following:

  1. Analyze and evaluate how your thinking was challenged in this course related to translation science; summary, analysis, synthesis; and using an evidence-based intervention in a practice change project to address a practice problem.
  2. Considering this new knowledge, examine how this learning prepares you to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Evaluate selected statistical methods for the purposes of critiquing the research to complement the critical appraisal of evidence. (POs 3, 5, 7, 9)
  2. Analyze research and non-research data for the purposes of critical appraisal and judgement of evidence for translation into practice (POs 1, 3, 5, 7, 9)
  3. Justify use of a translation science theory or model when designing, implementing, evaluating, and disseminating findings from a practice change project. (POs 1, 4, 5, 8, 9)
  4. Formulate a practice question focusing on the evidence-based intervention to influence practice outcomes. (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 9)
  5. Synthesize research study evidence and non-research evidence relevant to practice problems and a practice question. (POs 1, 3, 5, 9)

NR716 Week 8 Discussion | Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness Example

Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness

One of my roles as a DNP-prepared nurse is to strengthen nursing care and practice to improve patient outcomes. Achieving this goal requires providing high-quality, competent nursing care in diverse healthcare environments. Providing high-quality nursing and competently playing the role requires interpreting, synthesizing, and translating evidence from research. This discussion reflects on the lessons I have learned from this course and how the lessons have contributed to my readiness to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

Critical appraisal of research evidence was one of the significant lessons I learned in this course. I have appreciated that not all published sources are of high quality and can be used to guide solutions to various practice problems. Critical research appraisal involves a study’s analysis step by step, from the aim, methods, results, findings, and conclusion to recommendations (Long et al., 2020). A good research evidence source should also have a sample representative of the intended population and identify the limitations and how they are addressed. The course has equipped me with the necessary skills for critically appraising research.

The second lesson involves incorporating research and non-research data to inform evidence-based judgment and translation into practice. Useful information that a practitioner can translate into practice may not only be found in research sources but also in non-research sources. I have learned that incorporating both research and non-research information enhances the development of robust evidence, which, when leveraged effectively, can help address practice problems and improve care delivery and patient outcomes.

Evidence translation into practice is the other lesson I have learned. The various translation science theories can be used to guide evidence translation and implementation, as well as to integrate the various stakeholders whose influence would affect the success of intervention implementation. Additionally, I have learned to plan, implement, monitor, and evaluate practice change projects.

In planning and implementation, I have appreciated the importance of identifying potential barriers to evidence translation and stakeholder involvement, as well as methods for overcoming them. One can address barriers such as stakeholders’ conflicting interests and the disintegration of research and science translation and implementation by clearly identifying and communicating stakeholder roles, assessing stakeholder needs, and involving all the relevant stakeholders in implementation.

Based on the lessons learned from this course, I am ready to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse. Since my passion lies in nursing education, the lessons from this course were critical to me. As a nursing educator, it is essential to stay up-to-date with emerging evidence and recommendations from both research and non-research sources, thereby providing students with the best available information. Therefore, the skills acquired from the course will be instrumental in selecting and critiquing information as I develop my teaching content and expertise.

Additionally, the course has contributed to my readiness to practice as a DNP-prepared nurse by equipping me with the necessary skills to identify solutions for various practice problems and implement practice change projects. As Drobowolska et al. (2021) note, leadership in practice institutions is an essential role of DNP-prepared nurses. I am ready to lead other nurses and healthcare providers to craft problem solutions and implement practice change projects. As a nurse leader, it is my responsibility to address practice problems and use my critical appraisal of research to evaluate and advise other practice change project implementers.

Evidently, the course has equipped me with essential lessons to critically appraise research, interpret evidence, and translate it into practice, as well as effectively carry out practice change projects. The course has contributed to my readiness to practice, as reflected above.            

References

Dobrowolska, B., Chruściel, P., Markiewicz, R., & Palese, A. (2021). The role of doctoral‐educated nurses in the clinical setting: Findings from a scoping review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(19-20), 2808-2821. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15810     

Long, H. A., French, D. P., & Brooks, J. M. (2020). Optimizing the value of the critical appraisal skills program (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences, 1(1), 31-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2632084320947559