NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention Instructions

Discussion

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to demonstrate your understanding of the evidence-based intervention in a quantitative research study as the intervention in a practice change project. As you work to find solutions to a practice problem, the evidence-based intervention is found through the critical review and appraisal of quantitative research. Have a look at NR716 Week 2 Discussion | Synthesis.

Instructions
  1. As a DNP student, you are searching for an evidence-based intervention to translate into practice. Using the practice problem, you selected in NR715, continue your search and appraisal of evidence by analyzing one quantitative research study. This research study should not be one that was used in NR715.
  2. Appraise the quantitative research study using the Johns Hopkins Research Appraisal Tool. Transfer your findings to the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.
    1. Link (Word doc): Johns Hopkins Research Appraisal Tool.
    2. Link (Word doc): Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.
  3. Include your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool and permalink to the selected research study.
  4. Analyze the evidence summary tool of the research study to address the following in the discussion:
    1. Identify the outcomes specific to the intervention measured by the research team.
    2. Considering implementation fidelity, identify the steps you would take to translate/ implement this intervention in a practice setting.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Analyze research and non-research data for the purposes of critical appraisal and judgment of evidence for translation into practice. (POs 1, 3, 5, 7, 9)
  2. Formulate an emerging practice question focusing on the evidence-based intervention to influence practice outcomes. (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9)

NR716 Week 1 Discussion | The Evidence-Based Intervention Example

According to Healthdata.org, COPD is the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States, and in Pennsylvania, COPD is the 4th leading cause of death. Tobacco continues to lead to the risk of death and disability in both the United States as a whole and in Pennsylvania. Spending on COPD in 2016 was $34.3 billion (95% CI $31.5-$37.3 billion) according to Duan et al (2022). With this information in mind, studies are underway to help prevent admission from COPD exacerbation.

  1. Identify the outcomes specific to the intervention measured by the research team.

The primary outcome was the first hospital admission for COPD or death from any cause, and there was no significant difference in the study arm when compared to the control arm. Likewise, there was not a significant difference in the secondary outcome, which was the total number of hospital admissions and in-hospital days, either from COPD or any other cause. They did notice that there was a higher number of patients who reported that they had successfully quit tobacco use in the study arm.

2. Considering implementation fidelity, identify the steps you would take to translate/ implement this intervention in a practice setting.

To implement this intervention in practice, I would have to define what standard care is within my practice setting. If it is widely different than the study model standard of care, that within itself could violate the integrity. I would need to identify the questions used in the questionnaire for the study arm as well. I would also need to identify the providers in my practice who would be willing to participate, as some of the interventions are a change from our routine. The final aspect would be to ensure that we have adequate capacity in our pulmonary rehabilitation program to accommodate a larger number of patients than usual. 

Reference:

Duan KI, Birger M, Au DH, et al. US health care spending on respiratory diseases, 1996-2016. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 31 August 2022.

Healthdata.org United States of America. Top 10 causes of total number of deaths in 2019 and percent change 2009–2019, all ages combined (2023). https://www.healthdata.org/united-states.

Kalter-Leibovici, O., Benderly, M., Freedman, L. S., Kaufman, G., Falkenberg Luft, T. M., Murad, H., . . . Fink, G. (2018). Disease Management plus Recommended Care versus Recommended Care Alone for Ambulatory Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 197(12), 1565-1574. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201711-2182OC