NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique
NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution
The first step before starting to write the NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment.
It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.
How to Research and Prepare for NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list.
You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.
How to Write the Body for NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique
In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”
How to Write the Conclusion for NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319
Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.
NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique Instructions
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is for you to demonstrate an understanding and ability to search the library for quantitative research related to the practice problem. Use the focus of the Global Burden of Disease and National Practice Problems to guide your search for a quantitative article. From what you have learned from the Explore section choose a quantitative research article about one of the National Practice Problems. These eight National Practice Problems include: COPD, mental illness, addiction, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, obesity, and safety. You will successfully demonstrate your library search skills to identify evidence.
Instructions
Follow these guidelines when completing the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have any questions. Have a look at NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary.
Conduct a search of the library to find one quantitative research article related to one of the National Practice Problems. You will use the quantitative article you have selected for your paper. The DNP-prepared nurse uses the most recent (within 5 years) evidence available.
The quantitative source of evidence you select must be a single source of evidence. Systematic reviews and/or mixed-methods are not permitted for this assignment.
Present the written reference and the permalink to the article you chose.
Attach your completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool to your response.
Describe what you found most interesting or concerning in the study you selected.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Critically appraise literature for level and quality of evidence to support practice change. (POs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7)
Appraise global healthcare practice problems and DNP practice relevant to advanced nursing practice. (POs 1, 3, 9)
NR715 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Article Critique Example
Quantitative Article Critique
Qualitative research is research that involves the process of collecting and analyzing numerical data to test a theory, explain a particular phenomenon, or confirm a hypothesis. This discussion focuses on exploring a quantitative research article related to diabetes and the most concerning facts in the selected study.
The quantitative article selected is “Factors influencing Healthcare Providers’ attitude and willingness to use information technology in diabetes management” by Seboka, Yilma & Birhanu (2021).
The reference and permalink are:
Seboka, B. T., Yilma, T. M., & Birhanu, A. Y. (2021). Factors influencing healthcare providers’ attitudes and willingness to use information technology in diabetes management. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01398-w
Diabetes is a group of chronic metabolic disorders. It is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. It is attributed to 20.9 deaths per 100000 people in the general population (Bloomgarden, 2020). Moreover, it is characterized by high healthcare costs, with treating and managing it, as well as its complications, accounting for approximately 25% of the total healthcare costs. Diabetes is a significant public health problem globally. According to the American Diabetes Association, every 1 in 4 dollars used in healthcare in the US is used for treating diabetes and its complications (American Diabetes Association, 2018).
Healthcare technology is advancing at a rapid rate, mandating that care providers apply it, especially for practice problems such as diabetes. It is, therefore, essential to assess the attitude and willingness of care providers to use current technology in diabetes management. The most concerning aspect of the selected study is its findings. The study aims to describe the attitudes and willingness of care providers to use information technology in managing patients with diabetes.
The overall result is that most care providers have a positive attitude and are willing to use electronic technologies to facilitate patient management for diabetes patients. However, the majority of them lack the necessary skills. Therefore, the conclusion is that regular training should be facilitated for healthcare providers to keep them up to date with current healthcare technologies and equip them with the necessary skills.
References
American Diabetes Association. (2018). Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2017. Diabetes Care, 41(5), 917-928. https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0007
Bloomgarden, Z. T. (2020). Diabetes and COVID‐19. Journal of Diabetes, 12(4), 347-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.13027
Seboka, B. T., Yilma, T. M., & Birhanu, A. Y. (2021). Factors influencing healthcare providers’ attitudes and willingness to use information technology in diabetes management. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01398-w
