NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary
NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution
The first step before starting to write the NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment.
It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.
How to Research and Prepare for NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list.
You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.
How to Write the Body for NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary
In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”
How to Write the Conclusion for NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319
Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.
NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary Instructions
Purpose
Learning to critique and summarize research is an important skill for you to master. The purpose of this assignment is to 1) demonstrate library search techniques and 2) analyze quantitative research related to the Global Burden of Disease and National Practice Problems. Have a look at NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique.
You will review the characteristics of quantitative research within the Explore section this week. Then you will search for a recent (within 5 years) quantitative research article related to one of the eight National Practice Problems. These National Practice Problems include COPD, mental illness, addiction, heart disease, diabetes, cancer, obesity, and safety.
You will critique the quantitative article using the Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool. and then summarize the selected quantitative article and complete the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Table.
Instructions
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
Review the characteristics of quantitative research within the Explore section of this week\’s module and readings.
Use the most current version of Microsoft Word that is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing. You can tell the document is saved as the current version because it will end in \”docx.\”
Review the rubric for the grading criteria.
The assignment includes the following components:
Title page
Introduction (The word \”introduction\” is not used – include title of paper as level one heading)
Introduce the selected practice problem.
Literature chosen is < 5 years old.
Provides incidence and/or prevalence of the problem.
Literary Search Strategy
Identify the databases searched to locate the recent quantitative literature.
Include keywords used in your search.
Describe filters used.
Critique of Article Using the John Hopkins Appraisal Tool
Present aim of the study.
Share research method and design used.
Provide sample size and description of the sample.
Present overview of the findings.
Share strengths and limitations of the study.
Appraise the level and grade the quality of the study.
Summary (Using your own words- as if you were sharing the highlights with a friend)
Provide a summary detailing the main points and overall findings.
Discuss if this is a solution that can contribute to the practice problem.
Conclusion
Provide a clear and logical conclusion in 1-2 concise paragraphs.
Highlight the summary of findings.
Highlight overall quality (level and grade).
Conclude value of study to practice problem.
Reference page
Appendix
Embed the completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool as an Appendix.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
1-inch margins
Double-spaced pages
12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
Use of level 1 headers and subheadings to separate each section of the paper
References and citations in proper APA format (current version)
In-text citations
Reference page
Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
Standard English usage and mechanics
No spelling or typographical errors.
Organized content around the required components using level 1 headers.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Critically appraise literature for level and quality of evidence to support practice change. (POs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7)
Appraise global healthcare practice problems and DNP practice relevant to advanced nursing practice. (POs 1, 3, 9)
Due Date
By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Late Assignment Policy applies
NR715 Week 3 Assignment | Quantitative Article Search and Summary Example
Quantitative Article Search and Summary:
Evidence-based practice ensures that care is guided by the best and current research evidence. To gain this kind of evidence, a literature search and appraisal of the best quality of evidence is required. The literature search process is equally important in determining the quality and credibility of the evidence. Management of chronic diseases remains a challenge for the world’s healthcare systems. This paper aims to search for a quantitative research article from journals, explain the search process, and appraise one selected article to address chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD).
The Global Burden of Disease and National Practice Problems
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD) is a lung condition that forms part of the group of chronic lower respiratory diseases. This group is the third leading cause of death in the United States (Murphy et al., 2021). Worldwide, COPD is the third leading cause of death, according to the World Health Organization (2022). About 3 million deaths in 2019 were associated with COPD. Different complications, including pneumonia, respiratory failure, and pulmonary embolism cause deaths due to COPD.
The symptoms of pulmonary embolism can be masked by COPD deterioration and thus can contribute to mortality. One of the risks of PE in COPD is immobilization from activity intolerance and respiratory insufficiency (Han et al., 2022). Therefore, vigilance and surveillance for pulmonary embolism among COPD patients is a mortality-preventive strategy. This EBP project aimed to understand the current burden that PE has on patients with COPD. A quantitative research article by Couturaud et al. (2021) was selected after a systematic literature search.
Search Strategy
The first step in the literature search was to identify literature databases for the search. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Medline databases through PubMed. Search terms used were ‘chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder,’ ‘COPD,’ pulmonary embolism, PE, venous thromboembolism, and VTE. These keywords were used together with Boolean operators such as ‘AND’ and ‘OR’ to make the search more specific and focused on their relevance to the clinical problem.
Numerous results were returned after a search in the two databases. Therefore, search filters were applied to narrow these results further. Filtering the results using the time of publication limited the search to an article published within the last five years. Results were also filtered by type of research to include systematic reviews, clinical studies, clinical trials, and observational studies. Therefore, books and expert opinions were excluded. The article by Couturaud et al. (2021) was manually handpicked from the final returned results after a comparison of the final outcomes of the two databases for relevance to the clinical problem.
Critique of Article Using the Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool
Aim of the Study
Couturaud et al. (2021) aimed at determining PE prevalence in COPD patients admitted to the hospital with acutely worsening respiratory symptoms.
Research Method and Design Used
This study employed a quantitative research method, specifically a multicenter cross-sectional design. However, this cross-sectional study included a 3-month prospective follow-up to determine specific outcome measures.
Sample Size & Description of Sample
The study recruited 740 participants who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 240 were females with COPD. The mean age was 68.2 years, with a standard deviation of 10.9 years. The study was conducted in seven French hospitals.
An Overview of the Findings/Outcomes
At admission, 44 patients (5.9%) were confirmed to have a pulmonary embolism. At the end of the study, the prevalence of PE was 11.7%. The mortality rate was 6.7%, and the rate was higher among patients who had PE than those who did not have PE. Fifty-four patients who had thromboembolism died as compared with 36 who did not have thromboembolism. The risk difference was 20.7% with a 95% confidence interval. The difference was statistically significant with a P < .001.
Strengths and Limitations of The Study
This study provides a snapshot of point and period prevalence based on a relatively larger sample size (740). The large sample size makes the generalizability of the findings reasonable. The study was conducted in multiple centers, thus improving the generalizability and reducing single-center biases. However, the patients were selected when already in the wards. This means that the admission criteria for these patients would have included suspected VTE. Selection bias could be possible.
The Level and Grade of the Quality of The Study
This study provides a level of evidence because it is a non-experimental study, rather than a review study, according to the Johns Hopkins EBM Model’s Hierarchy of Evidence.
Summary
Venous thromboembolism, including pulmonary embolism, affects about one in every 10 patients with COPD, according to a study by Couturaud et al. (2021). The risk of death is higher when you have COPD and VTE than when you have COPD alone. Therefore, VTE is a significant cause of death among people with COPD.
Conclusion
VTE occurs in patients with COPD and those without it. PE among patients with COPD can be missed because it presents with symptoms of acute exacerbation of COPD. A literature search was conducted to evaluate the burden of VTE and PE in COPD patients. An article by Couturaud et al. (2021) was selected after a systematic search. In this prospective study, VTE occurred in 1 in every 10 patients with COPD, and the risk of death was higher in patients with COPD.
This study was relevant to my clinical problem because it provides quantitative insight into the burden of VTE among patients with COPD. The hierarchy of evidence, according to the Johns Hopkins Evidence-based Medicine, is level three. The significance of its findings suggests the need to screen COPD patients for VTE to reduce the risk of mortality.
References
Couturaud, F., Bertoletti, L., Pastre, J., Roy, P.-M., Le Mao, R., Gagnadoux, F., Paleiron, N., Schmidt, J., Sanchez, O., De Magalhaes, E., Kamara, M., Hoffmann, C., Bressollette, L., Nonent, M., Tromeur, C., Salaun, P.-Y., Barillot, S., Gatineau, F., Mismetti, P., … PEP Investigators. (2021). Prevalence of pulmonary embolism among patients with COPD hospitalized with acutely worsening respiratory symptoms. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 325(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.23567
Han, W., Wang, M., Xie, Y., Ruan, H., Zhao, H., & Li, J. (2022). Prevalence of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thromboembolism in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9, 732855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.732855
Murphy, S. L., Kochanek, K. D., Xu, J., & Arias, E. (2021). Mortality in the United States, 2020. NCHS Data Brief, 427, 1–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34978528
World Health Organization. (2022, May 20). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Who.int. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-(COPD)
Appendix A: Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Practice Question: Among patients admitted with COPD, what is the clinical burden of venous thromboembolism after three months?
Date: November 5th
| Article Number | Author and Date | Evidence Type | Sample, Sample Size, Setting | Findings That Help Answer the EBP Question | Observable Measures | Limitations | Evidence Level, Quality |
| 1 | Couturaud et al. Date: 2021 | Quantities study (cross-sectional design) | 740 patients with COPD, mean age of 68.2 years, in 7 French hospitals | 11.7% developed VTE, 6.7% mortality rate, 54 vs 36 in VTE vs non-VTE patients. | Prevalence rates, mortality rates, risk differences | Selection bias due to the selection of admitted patients, whose criteria would have included VTE | Level III evidence, credible quality due to re-elevate to the clinical question, valid findings, and current (less than 5 years) |
| N/A | |||||||
| N/A |
Attach a reference list with full citations of articles reviewed for this Practice question.
Couturaud, F., Bertoletti, L., Pastre, J., Roy, P.-M., Le Mao, R., Gagnadoux, F., Paleiron, N., Schmidt, J., Sanchez, O., De Magalhaes, E., Kamara, M., Hoffmann, C., Bressollette, L., Nonent, M., Tromeur, C., Salaun, P.-Y., Barillot, S., Gatineau, F., Mismetti, P., … PEP Investigators. (2021). Prevalence of pulmonary embolism among patients with COPD hospitalized with acutely worsening respiratory symptoms. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 325(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.23567
