NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is for you to evaluate a National Practice Problem within the context of your practice problem idea and technology expansion within your healthcare setting. Have a look at NR 706 Week 4 Translation Science Project Assignment.

Instructions

Select one leading National Practice Problem that is prevalent in your patient population or healthcare setting and address the following:

  1. Describe an issue related to the National Practice Problem you selected that is impacting quality, safety, or financial outcomes at your practice setting.
  2. Elaborate how technology such as the electronic medical record might assist in implementing, evaluating, or sustaining an evidence-based intervention to address the identified problem.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric.
Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

  1. Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
  2. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Use information technology to collect and analyze data to generate evidence-based nursing practice across healthcare settings. (PC 4; PO 7)
  2. Design programs that monitor and evaluate outcomes of care, care systems, and quality improvement. (PC 4; PO 7)
  3. Evaluate the types of healthcare information systems, knowledge-based systems, and patient care technology and the impact on patient safety, quality of care, and outcome measurement. (PC 4; PO 7)
  4. Resolve ethical and legal issues related to the use of information, communication networks, and information and patient care technology. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)

NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice Example

Translating Evidence into Practice

Medication errors remain prevalent in healthcare settings and have been linked to decreased quality of care, poor health outcomes, adverse effects on patient safety, and increased financial losses incurred by hospitals (Ciapponi et al., 2021). Adverse drug events (ADEs) are one issue associated with medication errors. ADEs are detrimental events resulting from the wrongful use of medications and can lead to prolonged hospitalizations, rising cost of care, and mortalities (Feagins et al., 2019).

Incorrect dosing, drug interactions, and errors during the administration of drugs can all lead to ADEs. Studies have shown that 1 out of 10 hospital admissions is due to ADEs and that approximately $21 to $29 billion is spent annually on medication errors (Feagins et al., 2019). Staff training, medication reconciliation, proper ordering, and administration processes are all essential in battling this issue. Enormous financial and human resources are all vital in ensuring that hospitals are free of medication errors.

The use of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) can help in the adoption and sustainability of evidence-based interventions to address the issue of medication errors. Through EMRs, healthcare professionals involved in patient care can access medication information and confirm orders regarding dosage, timing, and administration site, all of which are essential in preventing ADEs. Clinical decision support tools can help healthcare workers determine which medications are appropriate for various diagnoses. These tools can help healthcare professionals safely order and administer medication.

The technology can also help identify patients at the highest risk of developing allergies and assist in finding alternative medications that should be prescribed for them (Mills, 2019). The EMRs can also help assess whether the medications effectively address the issues for which they have been prescribed. The data gathered from these systems can be used for quality improvement. Collaboration and communication among healthcare workers in seeking solutions for medication errors can also be enhanced when this technology is adopted in an organization.

References

Ciapponi, A., Fernández Nievas, S. E., Seijo, M., Rodríguez, M. B., Vietto, V., García-Perdomo, H. A., Virgilio, S., Fajreldines, A. V., Tost, J., Rose, C. J., & García-Elorrio, E. (2021). Reducing medication errors for adults in hospital settings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021(11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009985.pub2

Feagins, L. A., Abdelsayed, G. G., & Schairer, J. (2019). Reporting adverse drug events. The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 114(9), 1411–1413. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000374

Mills, S. (2019). Electronic health records and use of clinical decision support. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 31(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2019.02.006