NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment
NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution
The first step before starting to write the NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment.
It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.
How to Research and Prepare for NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list.
You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.
How to Write the Body for NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment
In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”
How to Write the Conclusion for NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319
Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.
NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment Instructions
Select and review five research articles related to the practice issue and proposed intervention of your PICOT question. These articles may include quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods studies (original research); systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or meta-syntheses (synthesis); or clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Complete one table for each selected article. Have a look at NR585NP Week 6 Collaboration Cafe: Research Ethics.
- Use the Literature Summary TemplateLinks to an external site. to complete the assignment.
-
- Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric.
- Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
- Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.
Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).
- State the PICOT question, including
-
- Population
- Intervention
- Comparison
- Outcome
- Timeframe
- Use standard PICOT sentence format
- For each article, select the correct table and complete with the information appropriate for the type of article selected, including
-
- Full APA reference
- Purpose
- Methods/search strategy/systematic review of literature
- Sample and participants/discussion of inclusion criteria/stakeholders and peer review
- Findings
- Limitations/strength of recommendations
- Relevance to the identified practice issue or proposed intervention
- Ensure each article meets the following
-
- Article is published in a peer-reviewed, provider-focused journal or is a current clinical practice guideline
- Publication date is current within five years.
NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment Example
NR585NP: Literature Summary Assignment Template
Name:
Date:
Follow the instructions provided in the Week 5 Assignment Guidelines and Rubric to complete the information below.
- Use this Literature Summary Template to complete the assignment. Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric.
- Use complete sentences to document findings.
- State the PICOT question from Week 2 in the first table, including
- Population
- Intervention
- Comparison
- Outcome
- Timeframe
- Use standard PICOT format and label each element
- Select the correct table for each of the five articles and complete the information that aligns with the type of research article selected.
- Original research: single quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods study
- Synthesis: systematic review, meta-analysis, or meta-synthesis
- CPG: clinical practice guideline
- Copy and paste the tables to classify your five articles correctly. Delete tables that are not used.
| PICOT Statement |
| State your PICOT statement from Week 2 in the standard format and label each element ( e.g., P, I, C, O, T). In adults and older patients (P), how does the proper utilization of evidence-based hand hygiene practices by healthcare practitioners (I), compared to non-adherent hand hygiene (C), affect the rate of healthcare-associated infections (O) within 6–8 months (T)? |
| Original Research Articles | |
| Full reference for article (APA Format) and Chamberlain University hyperlink | Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., & Abu Bakar, M. (2018). Health care-associated infections – an overview. Infection and Drug Resistance, 11, 2321–2333. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S177247 |
| Purpose and Type of Research | This study offers an in-depth literature-supported analysis of the global burden, causes, and control strategies related to HAIs. |
| Methods | Literature supported review comprising of epidemiological data, surveillance reports and previously published studies on the regional infection and statistics on health care associated infections. |
| Sample and Participants | Global data from different groups, such as low-, middle-, and high-income countries, on healthcare-associated infection statistics across various healthcare settings. Contributing factors and the highest population at risk. |
| Study Findings | Enhanced hand hygiene practices are more often linked to a reduction in healthcare-associated infections globally. In the report, they emphasize that not washing hands properly by healthcare staff is one of the biggest reasons for HAIs, which put patients at great risk. ICUs and surgical wards are at high risk for the spread of diseases because pathogens are mainly transmitted by contaminated hands. Experts state that regular use of proper hand hygiene tools and techniques is linked to a major drop in infections. Making sure these protocols are followed helps to stop HAIs and enhances the results seen by patients. |
| Limitations of the Study | It is considered a broad-scope research paper as opposed to a controlled study comprising a mixture of data sources. |
| Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention | It bridges the gap between the principles of proper hand hygiene and reducing the rates of hospital-acquired infection. |
| Synthesis Articles | |
| Full reference for article (APA Format) | Wang, C., Jiang, W., Yang, K., Yu, D., Newn, J., Sarsenbayeva, Z., Goncalves, J., & Kostakos, V. (2021). Electronic Monitoring Systems for Hand Hygiene: Systematic Review of Technology. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(11), e27880. |
| Purpose and Type of Research | An updated systematic review of the various technologies necessary to monitor compliance with hand hygiene techniques that is key in reducing microbial. |
| Search strategy | Reviewed studies from different sources, such as PubMed and other databases, focusing on electronic monitoring technologies. |
| Discussion of Inclusion Criteria | Included systems designed to monitor and improve hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers. |
| Study Findings | The use of electronic monitoring system enhanced compliance and enabled behavioral feedback, reducing HAIs indirectly. |
| Limitations of the Study | The cost of implementation was high, raised privacy concerns, and technical limitations of its application in the real world. |
| Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention | Supports the notion that proper hand hygiene has the ability to reduce the risks of infectious transmission and the role of monitoring the systems in health care settings to adhere to hygiene protocols. |
| Clinical Practice Guideline | |
| Full reference for article (APA Format) | World Health Organization. (2022). WHO guidelines on hand hygiene in health care. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241597906 |
| Purpose and Type of Research | Evidence-based clinical guideline for hand hygiene practices in healthcare. |
| Systematic Review of Literature | Based on extensive literature review of infection control and hand hygiene practices. |
| Stakeholders and Peer Review | Involves experts from global health and infection control organizations; peer-reviewed by global stakeholders. |
| Study Findings | Alcohol-based hand rubs and standardized hygiene practices significantly reduce HAIs when followed consistently. |
| Strength of Recommendations | Strongly recommends the use of alcohol-based hand rubs and structured training for healthcare providers. |
| Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention | Reinforces the need and importance of practicing global health practices for hand hygiene to prevent the transmission of hospital-acquired infections. |
NR585NP Week 5 Literature Summary Assignment Example 2
Name: JW
Date: 2/7/25
Follow the instructions provided in the Week 5 Assignment Guidelines and Rubric to complete the information below.
1. Use this Literature Summary Template to complete the assignment. Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric.
2. Use complete sentences to document findings.
3. State the PICOT question from Week 2 in the first table, including a. Population b. Intervention c. Comparison d. Outcome e. Timeframe f. Use standard PICOT format and label each element 4. Select the correct table for each of the five articles and complete the information that aligns with the type of research article selected.
· Original research: single quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods study
· Synthesis: systematic review, meta-analysis, or meta-synthesis
· CPG: clinical practice guideline 5. Copy and paste the tables to classify your five articles correctly. Delete tables that are not used.
PICOT Statement
State your PICOT statement from Week 2 in the standard format and label each element ( e.g., P, I, C, O, T).
In adult patients, how does non-pharmacological treatment, compared to pharmacological therapy, improve symptoms of chronic pain within 6 months
Original Research Articles: Full reference for article (APA Format) and Chamberlain University hyperlink – Riipinen, P., Holmes, M., Ogilvie, S., Newell, D., Byfield, D., & Rose, A. (2022). Patient’s perception of exercise for management of chronic low back pain: A qualitative study of exercise for the management of low back pain. Musculoskeletal Care, 20(4), 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1637
Purpose and Type of Research
This is a qualitative study aimed to explore what patients receiving manual therapy are told and understand about their low back pain diagnosis and how it affects perceptions regarding the role of exercise in the management of low back pain.
Methods
The method used for this study was an interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) study design using a semi-structured telephone interview with patients experiencing chronic low back pain.
Sample and Participants
A sample size of 8-10 men and women over the age of 18 and with a history of low back pain for more than 3 months.
Study Findings
Patients expressed various beliefs about the cause of their pain. There were three main themes from the analysis: Constructing explanation of pain, expectations of exercise within care-seeking behaviors, and resolving conflict between exercise and back pain narratives.
Limitations of the Study
The study was conducted in a student teaching clinic, which may not provide a true reflection of clinical practice.
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention
The use of non-pharmacological methods to reduce chronic pain is important to practice and in reducing adverse effects from opioid use.
Full reference for article (APA Format) – Birkinshaw, H., Friedrich, C. M., Cole, P., Eccleston, C., Serfaty, M., Stewart, G., White, S., Moore, R. A., Phillippo, D., & Pincus, T. (2023). Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 5(5), CD014682. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD014682.pub2
Purpose and Type of Research
To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of antidepressants for adults with chronic pain
Search strategy
A search of multiple databases and clinical trial registries for randomized controlled trials of antidepressants for chronic pain conditions in January 2022
Discussion of Inclusion Criteria
Included in the findings were antidepressants used for chronic pain against any comparator, including placebos, other medications, and other antidepressants at different doses. RCTs excluded were those with follow-ups of less than two weeks and with fewer than 10 participants.
Study Findings
Duloxetine was considered the highest-ranked antidepressant with moderate to high certainty evidence. Milnacipran was ranked the next most effective antidepressant.
Limitations of the Study
There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions for the efficacy and safety of any other antidepressants for chronic pain.
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention
The use of Duloxetine shows promise as a good treatment option for chronic pain and reduces the need for the use of opioids for first-line treatment.
Clinical Practice Guideline Full reference for article (APA Format) – Dowell D, Ragan KR, Jones CM, Baldwin GT, Chou R. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain — United States, 2022. MMW
Purpose and Type of Research
The purpose of the research is to improve communication between providers and patients on the risks and benefits of opioid therapy. The type of research used was a systematic review.
Systematic Review of Literature
The review of literature includes a comprehensive literature search, quality assessment, data extraction, and statistical analysis.
Stakeholders and Peer Review
This was peer reviewed, and the stakeholders are patients with chronic pain, caregivers, and providers. Study Findings: There are 12 recommendations for providers prescribing opioids in patients > 18 years of age with acute, subacute, and chronic pain, excluding cancer-related pain, sickle cell disease-related pain, and end-of-life care.
Strength of Recommendations
The recommendations are practical and include non-pharmacological interventions as well as pharmacological.
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention
With the opioid crisis in the US, it is important to follow the guidelines for opioids to patients and to include other pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments in the plan of care
Original Research Articles: Full reference for article (APA Format) and Chamberlain University hyperlink – Hestmann, R., Bratås, O., & Grønning, K. (2023). Chronic pain self-management interventions in primary care – does it make any difference? A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 537–537.
Purpose and Type of Research
This is a qualitative study used to explore whether patients with chronic pain utilize self-management interventions in primary care and whether these interventions lead to any positive changes.
Methods
The method used was a qualitative study with a randomized controlled study and the data collected were analysed using systematic text condensation.
Sample and Participants
Semi-structured individual face-to-face interviews with 17 participants, 3months after interventions
Study Findings
This study showed that participants who positively self-managed their chronic pain after participating in self-interventions
Limitations of the Study
Participants were selected from a healthy life center, which may not provide a clear picture of all primary care centers.
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention
Non-pharmacological interventions are often just as effective in managing chronic pain as pharmacological treatment options are. It is important to create a care plan that is individualized to each patient.
Original Research Articles Full reference for article (APA Format) and Chamberlain University Hyperlink
Rufener L, Akre C, Rodondi P-Y, Dubois J (2024). Management of chronic non-cancer pain by primary care physicians: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 19(7): e0307701. https://doi.org/10.1371/
Purpose and Type of Research
This is a qualitative study on the management of chronic non-cancer pain by primary care physicians.
Methods
This is an exploratory qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews among Primary Care Providers.
Sample and Participants
Ten Primary care providers in practice have treated at least one patient with chronic non-cancer pain over the past year.
Study Findings
PCPs agree that much experience is needed to provide adequate care for patients with chronic pain influenced by the patient-provider relationship, choice of treatment, investigation of the cause of pain, and the psychological and socioeconomic aspects of patient care.
Limitations of the Study
There was a small study group of physicians and this may not represent the opinions of all PCPs
Relevance to Practice Issue or Proposed Intervention
Managing chronic pain is very complex and requires many assessments and treatment options. Every patient is different and responds to various therapies differently.
