NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study 

NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study Instructions

Risk Management Case Study

Complete a worksheet analyzing a case study. For this session, here is the case study under consideration:

In a hospital setting, a patient admitted to the emergency department (ED) for an acute MI receives medications for this event. However, during the handoff to the Cardiac Care Unit (CCU), discrepancies in medication orders occur, leading to confusion and over medication of the patient. As a result the patient develops an acute hypotensive event and requires prolonged hospitalization and stabilization. Have a look at NR584 Week 4 Discussion: Client-Centered Care Initiatives.

General Instructions

1. Review the Week 3 Risk Management Case Study scenario.
2. Use the provided Template. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.
3. Complete the Risk Management Case Study Template using the provided scenario.
4. Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
5. Provide an in-text citation from three scholarly sources to support your writing.
6. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).

1. Identification
   1. Identify the risk.
   2. Select the most appropriate classification of the risk.
   3. Describe the risk domain.
2. Factors
   1. Describe four factors that contribute to the risk.
3. Proactive Measures
   1. Discuss three proactive measures to reduce or prevent the risk.
   2. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
4. Mitigation Strategies
   1. Describe three strategies the advanced practice nurse may use to mitigate the identified risk.
   2. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.
5. Regulatory Foundations
   1. Identify at least one regulatory agency that provides guidance to manage the risk.
   2. Discuss applicable regulations.
   3. Include an in-text citation from one scholarly source or regulatory agency to support your writing.
6. Reflection
   1. Describe how the advanced practice nurse can monitor the application and efficacy of the mitigation strategy.
   2. Discuss how you will apply the mitigation strategies in your practice.
   3. Reflect on what you have learned from this assignment.

NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study Template 

Name:                                                                                    

General Instructions:

1. Review the Week 3 Risk Management Case Study scenario in the course’s Announcements section.
2. Use this template for the assignment. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.
3. Complete this using the provided scenario.
4. Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
5. Provide an in-text citation from three scholarly sources to support your writing.
6. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.

Complete the following sections:

1. Identification
   1. Identify the risk.

• Select the most appropriate classification of the risk.

• Describe the risk domain.

• Contributing Factors
  • Describe four factors that contribute to the risk.

• Proactive Measures
• Discuss three proactive measures to reduce or prevent the risk. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

• Mitigation Strategies
  • Describe three strategies the advanced practice nurse may use to mitigate the identified risk. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

• Regulatory Foundations
  • Identify at least one regulatory agency that provides guidance to manage risk. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

• Discuss applicable regulations.

• Reflection
  • Describe how the advanced practice nurse can monitor the application and efficacy of the mitigation strategy.

• Discuss how you will apply the mitigation strategies in your practice.

• Reflect on what you have learned from this assignment.

References

NR584NP Week 3 Assignment: Risk Management Case Study Example

Complete the following sections:

1. Identification

a. Identify the risk.

The risk in this scenario is missing the cancer diagnosis by failing to do a proper, full, in-depth assessment of risk factors, therefore delaying the colon cancer screening, which could have resulted in disease progression, delayed treatment, and legal implications. The patient could have suffered a much more advanced diagnosis that could have given him an inferior prognosis.

b. Select the most appropriate classification of the risk.

The most appropriate classification of the risk in this scenario falls under Compliance. The healthcare provider failed to assess the patient’s risk factors for colon cancer, therefore, not scheduling a colon screening under the guidelines within the organization.

c. Describe the risk domain.

The risk domain is clinical/safety. This domain focuses on improving the quality and safety of services provided to patients.

2. Contributing Factors a. Describe four factors that contribute to the risk.

Human Factors- High workloads often lead to rushing through patient visits and missed opportunities to provide high-quality and thorough care.

System Failure Factors- lack of communication between the provider and patient led to missed risk assessment and the need for colon cancer screening.

Missed screening protocols: The provider failed to conduct a thorough assessment and evaluate the patient’s medical history for risk factors.

Human-System Interrelated Factors- The provider failed to provide the patient with proper follow-up to ensure that the patient had the necessary appointments and screening information.

3. Proactive Measures

a. Discuss three proactive measures to reduce or prevent the risk. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

Frequent education and training- Ensuring everyone has the same training and uses the same processes will help reduce errors and ensure patients have access to timely screenings. One study showed a 77% reduction in diagnostic errors due to an ongoing education program between physicians (Abimanyi-Ochom et al., 2019).

Standardized Guidelines for annual screenings- Following the most up-to-date guidelines and evidence-based practice for annual screenings, so that all patients presenting with specific symptoms and risk factors are scheduled for necessary screenings.

Improved Communication- Develop strategies to improve communication between other healthcare providers and patients. Using the decision aids in the EHR and utilizing checklists and soft stops within the software can help to reduce errors.

4. Mitigation Strategies

a. Describe three strategies the advanced practice nurse may use to mitigate the identified risk. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing. Perform Detailed, comprehensive assessments. APNs should always perform thorough assessments and, in this scenario, should pay close attention to the symptoms the patient has as well as any past medical history that puts the patient at risk for colon cancer, such as GERD, H. Pylori infections, Gastroparesis, and GI bleeding.

Clinical Decision Support Tools- A risk assessment tool applies a risk prediction model and presents risk information in a way that will change the actions of patients and clinicians (Walker et al., 2018). CDST provides real-time access to evidence-based guidelines, patient data, and relevant information.

Timely Follow-up- Keeping track of the patients who are at risk for colorectal cancer and ensuring that they have the proper referrals promptly.

5. Regulatory Foundations

a. Identify at least one regulatory agency that provides guidance to manage risk. Provide an in-text citation from one scholarly source to support your writing.

The US primary agency that guides colorectal cancer management is the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). This task force issues recommendations based on evidence-based research for colorectal cancer screenings. Other agencies include the American Cancer Society, CDC, FDA, and the National Cancer Institute.

b. Discuss applicable regulations.

The American Cancer Society, US Preventive Services Task Force, US Multisociety Task Force, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network all recommended lowering the recommended age of first screening for colorectal cancer from 50 to 45 years for average-risk patients, regardless of ethnicity (Huang & Kalady, 2023)

6. Reflection

a. Describe how the advanced practice nurse can monitor the application and efficacy of the mitigation strategy.

The Advanced Practice nurse can monitor the application and efficacy of the mitigation strategy by analyzing patient outcomes, adhering to evidence-based screening protocols, and using the Clinical Decision Support Tools to aid in risk assessment.

b. Discuss how you will apply the mitigation strategies in your practice. By utilizing evidence-based practice and CDST to assess risks and ensure timely follow-up for patients, there is no delay in care or missed diagnosis.

c. Reflect on what you have learned from this assignment. This assignment has helped me understand the importance of comprehensive assessments and the utilization of CDST to help provide the necessary care for my patients. Also, it is essential to continue education and monitor patient outcomes. The delivery of high-quality care is important not only for the patient and for establishing trust with the provider but also for reimbursement and reducing the risk of legal action.

References

Abimanyi-Ochom, J., Bohingamu Mudiyanselage, S., Catchpool, M., Firipis, M., Wanni Arachchige Dona, S., & Watts, J. J. (2019). Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 19(1), 174–174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0901-1

Walker, J. G., Macrae, F., Winship, I., Oberoi, J., Saya, S., Milton, S., Bickerstaffe, A., Dowty, J. G., De Abreu Lourenço, R., Clark, M., Galloway, L., Fishman, G., Walter, F. M., Flander, L., Chondros, P., Ait Ouakrim, D., Pirotta, M., Trevena, L., Jenkins, M. A., & Emery, J. D. (2018). The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine, 19(1), 397–397. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2764-7

Huang, E., & Kalady, M. F. (2023). 45 is the New 50: Demographic Trends in Colorectal Cancer Drive Recent US Screening Guideline Changes. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 30(4), 1927–1929. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-022-12986-z