NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis

NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis Instructions

Policy Analysis Assignment

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to develop competency in policy analysis. This assignment will allow for discovery into the impact of policy on healthcare and supports the professional formation of the nurse practitioner practice role. Have a look at NR582NP Week 7 Collaboration Café: Policy Analysis Presentation.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: 

• CO 1: Examine leadership competencies and underpinnings essential for advanced nursing practice. (POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
• CO 2: Evaluate factors that influence healthcare delivery across diverse settings. (POs 1, 5)
• CO 3: Appraise health policy and advocacy at all levels of the healthcare system. (POs 4, 5)
• CO 4: Apply advocacy for the development of health policy to advance healthcare outcomes and equity. (PO 5)
• CO 5: Develop professional competencies to lead in diverse healthcare settings. (POs 2, 3, 4, 5)

Due Date

Submit your presentation to the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 6.

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy. 

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 225 points.

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. 

General Instructions  

Research healthcare issues that have been identified in your local community. Note: you may use the information you discussed in this week’s Collaboration Café. Create a PowerPoint Presentation and address the following requirements:

1. Review Wilensky, S. E., & Teitelbaum, J. B. (2023). Essentials of health policy and law (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. Chapter 14: The Art of Structuring and Writing a Health Policy Analysis 
2. Download the Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint template. Use of this template is required. If the template is not used, a 10% deduction will be applied. See the rubric. Save the template and include your name in the file name.  
3. Complete the required Week 6 Policy Analysis PowerPoint. 
4. Follow APA rules for grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scholarly writing. 
5. Use PowerPoint’s Notes Page view feature to include speaker notes. Speaker notes should be included for all slides except the title and reference slides. Use complete sentences.  
6. Include in-text citations in APA format when applicable. 
7. Submit the presentation as a .ppt or .pptx file to the Week 6 Dropbox. PDF files are not accepted, as speaker notes are not visible.    
8. Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.  

Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric):

1. Title Slide (1 slide)
   1. Include your name and session. 
2. Introduction (1 slide)
   1. Identify the purpose of the presentation.  
3. Problem Statement (1 slide)
   1. Define the problem you will address in your analysis in a succinct, 1-2 sentence statement. 
   2. Write the problem statement in the form of a question. You may reuse the problem you identified for this week’s collaboration café.  
4. Background (1-3 slides)
   1. Provide factual information to define the problem.  
   2. Include general information about the topic.  
   3. Describe why the topic is important.  
   4. Explain why the topic needs to be addressed now.  
   5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.  
5. Landscape (1-3 slides)
   1. Identify relevant stakeholders.  
   2. Explain stakeholder concerns related to the problem.  
   3. Identify key factors that must be considered when analyzing the problem.  
   4. Discuss the relevance of each key factor.  
   5. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source.  
6. Options (1-3 slides)
   1. Identify at least three evidence-based options to address the problem.  
   2. Discuss the pros and cons of each option.  
   3. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source for each evidence-based option. 
7. Recommendation (1-3 slides)
   1. Identify the best option to address the problem.  
   2. Explain why your recommendation is the best solution.  
   3. Discuss mitigating strategies for any cons identified for the selected option.  
   4. Provide in-text citations from a scholarly source. 
8. Conclusion (1 slide)
   1. Provide a summary of the presentation.  
9. References
   1. Provide complete reference in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents are not required. 

Presentation Format 

1. The presentation should total 7-15 slides (excluding title and reference slides).   
2. Color schemes, font style, and size are consistent on each slide. 
3. Graphics and images (if used) are professional and appropriate. 
4. Speaker notes are provided for each slide (except the title and reference slides).  
5. Information included in speaker notes is presented in complete sentences, supports slide contents, and has appropriate citations. 

NR582 Week 6 Assignment: Policy Analysis Example PPT Notes

Policy Analysis Presentation On Opioid Crisis

Introduction

Hello and. My name is _. Welcome to today’s presentation. The presentation will identify and discuss a local problem for policy analysis. It will also discuss factual information to define the problem, its significance, and why it needs to be addressed now. It will also discuss stakeholders in addressing the problem and their relevance. In addition, the presentation will review evidence-based strategies to address the problem and select and discuss one of the best options for addressing the problem.

Problem Statement

The focus problem is the opioid crisis, with a significant focus on opioid abuse and opioid overdose-related deaths. There is a current opioid crisis that appears to be cyclic, probably due to a lack of sustainable interventions to address the problem, as Gleber et al. (2020). The opioid epidemic/crisis has many social, economic, and health impacts, as shall be discussed in the presentation. State governments have implemented measures, including a dedicated task force that focuses on addressing the crisis. However, selecting appropriate, comprehensive, and sustainable strategies to support the government-led efforts in helping mitigate the rise in the opioid crisis is crucial.

Background

The opioid crisis is a major problem at the local and national level. The United States has been reported as the country with the highest rate of opioid-related deaths globally. According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2024), the opioid-related death rate is 15.4 deaths per 100,000. The CDC (2024) also notes that 81083 people died in 2023 from opioid overdose, and fentanyl overdose contributed to the majority (74702 deaths). Opioids are laced with other stimulants such as cocaine and other opioids, which then leads to overdose without the individual’s knowledge.

Opioid abuse is the leading contributor to opioid overdose deaths. The Council of Michigan Foundations (2021) notes that 2743 people died from opioid overdose in Michigan, and opioid addiction patients percentage is second to alcohol. Florence et al. (2021) note that opioid addiction negatively impacts the economy, and opioid overdose and use disorders cost over $ 1 trillion annually. The opioid crisis is thus a menace that should be addressed promptly.

Opioid overdose-related deaths are at an all-time high, and the US has the highest burden, as the CDC (2024) notes. The opioid crisis is a public health burden that increases health problems, hospitalizations, and the spread of infections such as HIV and hepatitis C. It also has a high economic cost, from healthcare-related costs to lost productivity, criminal justice, and social services. Family disintegration and community breakdown is a major consequence of the opioid crisis. According to the Michigan Council of Foundations (2021), synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl, which are non-pharmaceutical, are worsening the crisis by increasing mortality rates.

The opioid overdose-related mortalities are high, and despite the slight decrease between 2022-2023, the high rates necessitate immediate efforts to support government interventions to address the crisis, as McManus (2024) notes. Synthetic opioids, which are more dangerous, are gaining ground; hence, more efforts are needed to curb their production and distribution. The healthcare system, hospitals, and rehabilitation centers are overwhelmed by opioid-related cases, which is affecting its ability to promote population health.

The opioid crisis is also draining economic resources (about $1 trillion of healthcare-related costs annually), and there is a need to reduce health and social services costs and improve population productivity, as Blanco et al. (2020) support. Policymakers can implement effective evidence-based best practices and reforms to address the crisis before it goes out of hand. Data from reliable sources such as the CDC can be used to support the EBP interventions or reforms.

Landscape

Various stakeholders are crucial to opioid crisis management. These stakeholders are responsible for the mitigation, prevention, data provision, or management of the crisis. The government is stated in most literature as the most significant external stakeholder in any initiative. Federal and state governments are stakeholders in the fight against the opioid epidemic. Healthcare professionals, including nurses, doctors, and addiction specialists, and healthcare organizations are also crucial in the opioid epidemic.

The justice system, including the judiciary, law enforcement, and social services, also play vital roles in containing the epidemic. Families and individuals affected by the opioid epidemic are primary stakeholders, given that they are the recipients of the opioid epidemic consequences. Public health agencies such as the CDC and WHO are vital in research and reporting to inform policies in the opioid epidemic.

Federal and state governments (and some local institutions) are policymakers that develop, find, and follow-up management programs for the opioid crisis, as Sellen et al. (2023) note. Healthcare professionals and organizations are on the frontline in prescribing, managing, diagnosing, and treating opioid use disorders. They are also crucial in ensuring proper prescribing practices based on current guidelines and regulations.

The justice system is vital for drug law enforcement and diversion programs to rehabilitate individuals with opioid use disorder. Sellen et al. (2023) note that public health agencies such as the CDC are crucial in availing data, research, and clinical guidelines for addressing the opioid epidemic. Families and individuals directly affected by the opioid epidemic are critical in opioid crisis advocacy and shaping public opinion and policy initiatives. These stakeholders are thus vital to the opioid epidemic management.

There are various key factors to consider in analyzing the opioid crisis. Prescription practices are a crucial factor, and overprescription is a leading cause of the problem. The average prescription rate is 39.5 per 100 persons, which is relatively high and escalates the opioid crisis, as Judd et al. (2023) note. The opioid addiction and dependency rates are also crucial as they contribute significantly to opioid abuse and opioid overdose-related deaths. The rise of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids availability in the market is crucial as it contributes to abuse and subsequent addiction and dependence.

Social determinants of health, such as socioeconomic status, education, and care access, affect health outcomes in the opioid crisis. The social inequalities contribute to the burden, increase abuse, and reduce the effectiveness of overdose detection and treatment, as Nicholson (2023) notes. More so, the legal and regulatory framework is crucial in analyzing the crisis, current regulations and guidelines’ effectiveness in addressing the issue, and current gaps are crucial to opioid crisis management improvement. The legal framework can thus help determine the best practices supported by the policies to address the opioid crisis effectively.

Options

One of the evidence-based strategies to address the problem is expanded access to medication-assisted treatment. The interventions use medications such as methadone, and behavioral therapy interventions help address addiction and improve behavior, hence addition management. According to Spayde-Baker and Patek (2023), MAT leads to decreased opioid use and reduced opioid overdoses and criminal activities. 

However, drugs used, such as methadone and buprenorphine, may be prone to misuse and diversion when use is not monitored. In addition, strict regulations are affecting the prescription and availability of the intervention, especially in some rural areas. Adeosun (2023) notes that stigma and misunderstanding are common and can discourage management continuation. Addressing these barriers can boost the intervention’s effectiveness and success.

Naloxone is a life-saving medication that reverses opioid overdoses. It is an antidote whose availability in communities has been advocated for by agencies and healthcare professionals. When available, It can be administered by non-medical professionals due to its simple formulations (nasal spray or injections). According to Smart et al. (2021), states that have adopted enhanced naloxone distribution laws have reported decreased opioid overdose deaths, showing the effectiveness of the interventions. However, some argue that naloxone availability poses a moral hazard as opioid users may misuse them due to the drugs’ availability (Ardejan et al., 2023). Ardejan et al. (2023) note that increased naloxone distribution may help reduce mortality rates but does not address the underlying addiction and misuse issues, and it increases healthcare costs.

Public health education campaigns are crucial in the prevention and management of the opioid crisis. Condie et al. (2023) note that public education campaigns help raise awareness of the problem, including its consequences and individual vulnerabilities. They can also help reduce exposure through behavior change. They also shape population behavior and decision-making by increasing people’s knowledge of the identification, management, and avoidance of opioid abuse/misuse.

It also enhances the public’s participation in mitigation strategies. The cons of the intervention include short-term focus, especially when the interventions are single-phased. In addition, public education requires enormous funds that may be unavailable considering resource limitations in health care, and funds are diverted to other services, such as management of overdoses and rehabilitation, as Livet et al. (2024) note. Addressing these limitations can help enhance the intervention’s success.

Recommendations

The selected intervention is medication-assisted treatment. The intervention is more curative, focusing on the management of addiction and dependence on opioid use. It is chosen because it reduces overdose mortality and risk, improves treatment retention, reduces criminal behavior, improves social outcomes, and improves overall patient outcomes and quality of life, as Russ and Gorham (2024) note. MAT offers a solution to opioid addiction and dependence, which is a major contributor to opioid overdose deaths. The intervention is also endorsed by public organizations such as the CDC, AHRQ, and WHO as an effective strategy in addressing addiction and dependence; hence, it was selected as the best strategy.

Medication diversion and misuse in MAT can hinder MAT success, as seen earlier. Strategies to address the problem include population education on proper use, administration of the drugs as directly observed therapy (DOT), and drug testing and prescription monitoring, as Han et al. (2021) note. DOT ensures medication use per prescription, while drug testing and prescription management ensure patients take medications as prescribed. Mobile clinics where care professionals take the services to the communications on a routine basis can help increase access to these services in rural areas. According to LaGrotta and Collins (2023), telemedicine adoption in MAT is a revolutionary intervention that improves access to care without patients having to travel long distances. Utilizing these strategies can help combat diversion and misuse and increase access to these services.

Stigma and misunderstanding are some of the cons identified. Patients are stigmatized and often misjudged by care professionals and communities. The primary cause of the stigmatization of MAT is the lack of understanding. Public education campaigns and care provider training can provide education on the benefits and application of MAT to eliminate stereotypes that lead to stigmatization, as Bielenberg et al. (2021) note. Bielenberg et al. (2021) also note that peer support/mentorship programs can be used to help patients seeking MAT overcome stigma and promote their retention. These strategies can help overcome stigma and misunderstanding and thus increase adherence, therefore resulting in better patient health outcomes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the opioid crisis is a healthcare epidemic with health, social, and economic impacts that need immediate attention. Stakeholders such as the government, public health agencies, and healthcare professionals are crucial in managing the opioid crisis. Key factors such as current regulatory frameworks and addiction rates are crucial in opioid crisis analysis, and the causes are vital to the management framework. Selected evidence-based interventions such as MAT, public education, and increased naloxone distribution can help address the issue. Strategies for the management of stigma, access barriers, and diversion and misuse management can enhance the success of MAT and promote efforts to address the opioid crisis.

Thank you for your participation. Any questions are now welcome.

References

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2024a). U.S. Overdose Deaths Decrease in 2023, First Time Since 2018. National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved July 7, 2024, from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/nchs_press_releases/2024/20240515.htm

Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2024b). Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 2002–2022. National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved October 10, 2024, from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db491.htm

Florence, C., Luo, F., & Rice, K. (2021). The economic burden of opioid use disorder and fatal opioid overdose in the United States, 2017. Drug and alcohol dependence, 218, 108350.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108350

Council of Michigan Foundations, (2021). Addressing the Opioid Crisis in Michigan. Retrieved October 6, 2024 https://www.michiganfoundations.org/news/addressing-opioid-crisis-michigan

Gleber, R., Vilke, G. M., Castillo, E. M., Brennan, J., Oyama, L., & Coyne, C. J. (2020). Trends in emergency physician opioid prescribing practices during the United States opioid crisis. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38(4), 735-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.011

Blanco, C., Wiley, T. R., Lloyd, J. J., Lopez, M. F., & Volkow, N. D. (2020). America’s opioid crisis: the need for an integrated public health approach. Translational Psychiatry, 10(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0847-1

Sellen, K., Markowitz, B., Parsons, J. A., Leece, P., Handford, C., Goso, N., Hopkins, S., Klaiman, M., Shahin, R., Milos, G., Wright A., Charles, M., Morrison, L., Strike, C., Orkin, A., & SOONER Investigators. (2023). Considerations for the design of overdose education and naloxone distribution interventions: results of a multi-stakeholder workshop. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 888. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15554-6

Judd, D., King, C. R., & Galke, C. (2023). The opioid epidemic: a review of the contributing factors, negative consequences, and best practices. Cureus, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.41621

Nicholson Jr, H. L. (2023). Social determinants of opioid use behaviors among adults in the United States. Journal of Substance Use, 28(3), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2022.2050317

Russ, B. R., & D. Gorham, J. (2024). Treating Adolescents With Opioid Use Disorder: A Medication-Assisted Treatment Approach. The Family Journal, 32(2), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807231164419

Han, B., Jones, C. M., Einstein, E. B., & Compton, W. M. (2021). Trends in and characteristics of buprenorphine misuse among adults in the US. JAMA Network Open, 4(10), e2129409-e2129409. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29409

LaGrotta, C., & Collins, C. (2023). Telemedicine and Medication-Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder. Technology-Assisted Interventions for Substance Use Disorders, 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26445-0_2

Bielenberg, J., Swisher, G., Lembke, A., & Haug, N. A. (2021). A systematic review of stigma interventions for providers who treat patients with substance use disorders. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 131, 108486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108486

Adeosun, S. O. (2023). Stigma by association: to what extent is the attitude toward naloxone affected by the stigma of opioid use disorder? Journal of Pharmacy Practice, 36(4), 941-952. https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900221097173 

Spayde-Baker, A., & Patek, J. (2023). A comparison of medication-assisted treatment options for opioid addiction: a review of the literature. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 34(4), E189-E194. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000392

Smart, R., Powell, D., Pacula, R. L., Peet, E., Abouk, R., & Davis, C. S. (2024). Investigating the complexity of naloxone distribution: Which policies matter for pharmacies and potential recipients. Journal of Health Economics, 97, 102917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102917

Ardeljan, A. D., Fiedler, B., Fiedler, L., Luck, G. R., Maki, D. G., Clayton, L., Hennekens, C. H., & Ferris, A. (2023). Naloxone over the counter: Increasing opportunities and challenges for health providers. The American Journal of Medicine, 136(6), 504-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.01.027

Condie, A. W., Judd, H., & Yaugher, A. C. (2023). Opioid use disorder community education events: Rural public health implications. Health Education & Behavior, 50(6), 728-737. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981221135506

Livet, M., Richard, C., & Gangi, E. W. (2024). The opioid response project: an effective learning collaborative for local communities?. Health Promotion Practice, 25(1), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399231162378