NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet

NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NR509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection Worksheet Example

Week 2 iHuman Assignment Reflection Worksheet

Please read the assignment guidelines and rubric. Respond substantively to each self-reflection question below. Write on this template. Have a look at NR509 Week 3 iHuman Case Study Jenna James.

1. Assess your ability to gather information on your client within the iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter.
   1. Use the iHuman score sheet to review your results for the focused health history and focused physical exam. How did you perform?

For the history section I scored an 89% which I feel is not bad, I did miss one question that was required. I believe that the layout of the questions should be better. For the physical section I scored an 83%, I feel as though I could have done a little better. I hope as I continue through these ihuman assignments I can better gauge accuracy on these assessments.

• What did you find easy or difficult about navigating through the focused health history and focused physical exam sections of the case?

I think that the layout could be better for the history section, some of the questions I would initially ask are all the way at the bottom. For the physical assessment portion, I feel the layout is better. It is organized in order; you basically just have to figure out which steps you feel is necessary for that patient encounter.

3.    Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.

One strategy to improve my results for the next patient would be to start more on the particular systems that the patient has complaints about and then branch off to systems I feel would be affected by this problem. 

• Assess your performance in documenting your findings on the electronic health record (EHR).
  • What did you find easy or difficult about navigating through the documentation of the history and physical within the system?

The layout for this program is very user-friendly. I used this program in my BSN physical assessment course, so I was versed on how to use this application.

• Did you document all required components in the case?
  • feel as though I documented all the required components. As I was going through the history and physical exam section I charted my findings as I went through which seemed to help me not forget key points.
  • Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.

One strategy that could improve my performance is not moving ahead until I reevaluate my finding and documentation to make sure they reflect each other. I believe this is important so you know you are documenting relevant information.

• Assess your performance in determining key findings and reviewing the most significant active problem.
  • What did you find easy or difficult about navigating through the key findings and organization section of the case?
    • feel like this application made it simple to document the key findings on the side as you went through the physical assessment. This made it very easy to keep up with things that should be included in documentation.
  • How did your key findings compare with the expert’s  findings?
    • believe that my findings where not far off from the experts findings. Although I did not put that the patient had a sick roommate or a flu vaccine in my key findings, I did document that information in my problem statement. I mainly used the key findings for my objective information.
  • Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.
    • would use the current guidelines and practices and do more research on my findings  to help me determine the most appropriate treatment for the patient.
• Assess your performance in creating and documenting a problem statement within the iHuman case.
  • What did you find easy or difficult about creating the problem statement?
    • felt that creating a problem statement was fairly easy to me. I am an ER nurse so I treated it as I do my triage note. Basically why did the patient come in to be seen and all the information they tell you and I added my objective information from the exam in there as well.
  • How did your problem statement compare with the expert’s response provided?

Our statements were very similar, I did not, however, add the exact temperature like the experts did. I feel that would be double charting and increase room for error since the vitals would be charted.

• Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.
  • would make sure that my problem statement addresses everything important in the patient encounter included exam points that are negative.
• Assess your performance in creating and documenting a management plan within the iHuman case.
  • What did you find easy or difficult about creating the management plan?
    • found it difficult to create this plan since the CDC recommended antiviral treatment but in this case was not warranted. I also thought the dosing for OTC medication was difficult due to there being so many different types of cough suppressant and different forms.
• How did your management plan compare with the expert’s response provided?

The plans were very similar, I did use brand names for the otc medications instead of the generic. I feel it is easier to refer to medications to patients in this way because they generally know what you are referring to.

• Describe one strategy to improve your performance in the next Virtual Patient Encounter.

I would put in my management plan more education on preventive care. It is important that patients know how to prevent illnesses if able. For example explaining the importance and benefits of getting the yearly flu vaccine to the patient in this encounter.