NR 718 Week 1 Discussion Evaluating Leadership Competencies for the Advanced Practice Nurse
NR 718 Week 1 Discussion Evaluating Leadership Competencies for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Evaluating Leadership Competencies for the Advanced Practice Nurse Example
Leadership competencies are essential for advanced practice nurses (APNs) as they play a vital role in healthcare delivery. Effectively leading and managing healthcare teams can significantly impact patient outcomes. APNs must possess various leadership competencies, including clinical, professional, and health systems leadership competencies (Chair et al., 2023). This paper aims to examine these competencies and identify strengths and areas for development.
Clinical leadership competency involves providing leadership and liaising with other health agencies and professionals to improve patient care (Heinen et al., 2019). This competency is one of my strengths in my current psychiatric mental health nurse practice. This competency has enhanced my effective communication and collaboration with the interdisciplinary team to provide patient care. It has also enhanced my skills in analyzing organizational systems for barriers and promoting enhancements that affect client healthcare status.
Professional leadership competency is my second strength, and it involves participating in professional organizations and activities that influence advanced practice nursing (Heinen et al., 2019). As an APN in psychiatry and mental health, I am interested in advancing the nursing profession and have actively participated in professional organizations. This has enhanced my knowledge and skills in advanced practice nursing.
My third strength is health systems leadership competency, which involves demonstrating leadership in enhancing group dynamics and managing group conflicts within the organization (Heinen et al., 2019). In my current practice as a psychiatric mental health nurse, I have experience in managing conflicts and fostering a positive work environment, which has improved teamwork and, ultimately, patient care.
As a DNP-prepared psychiatric and mental nurse, I am interested in further developing my clinical and health systems leadership competencies, specifically in advanced communication skills, health policy, and creating a supportive organizational environment. I aim to enhance my ability to effectively lead quality improvement and patient safety initiatives using advanced communication skills and processes (Howick et al., 2019). I am also interested in applying business, finance, economics, and health policy principles to develop and implement effective plans for practice-level and system-wide initiatives that improve the quality of care delivery (Heinen et al., 2019). Lastly, I advocate for and create an organizational environment supporting safe client care, collaborative practice, and professional growth.
NR 718 Week 1 Discussion Evaluating Leadership Competencies for the Advanced Practice Nurse References
Chair, S. Y., Wong, F. K. Y., Bryant-Lukosius, D., Liu, T., & Jokiniemi, K. (2023). Construct validity of advanced practice nurse core competence scale: An exploratory factor analysis. BMC Nursing, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01203-1
Heinen, M., Oostveen, C., Peters, J., Vermeulen, H., & Huis, A. (2019). An integrative review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(11), 2378–2392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14092
Howick, J., Moscrop, A., Mebius, A., Fanshawe, T. R., Lewith, G., Bishop, F. L., Mistiaen, P., Roberts, N. W., Dieninytė, E., Hu, X.-Y., Aveyard, P., & Onakpoya, I. J. (2019). Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 111(7), 240–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818769477
Also Read:
NR717 Week 1 ErnestYoung Leading Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Healthcare Discussion
NR 718 Week 1 Discussion Evaluating Leadership Competencies for the Advanced Practice Nurse Instructions
Purpose
The DNP-prepared APN works to affect change in practice to provide safe and high-quality patient care. The purpose of this discussion is to evaluate the leadership competencies of the APN.
Instructions
Review the lesson and readings from this week and the following article:
Heinen, M., van Oostveen, C. Peters, J., Vermeulen, H., & Huis, A. (2019). An integrative review of leadership competencies and attributes in advanced nursing practice.Links to an external site. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75, 2378-2392. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14092 (see Table 2)
Then, respond to the following:
- Identify and evaluate three competencies that are a strength for you in your current practice.
- Identify and examine three competencies that you are interested in further developing as you prepare for your role as a DNP-prepared nurse.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
NR 718 Week 2 Advanced Practice Nurse Clinical Leadership: Identifying Grants to Fund Practice Change Initiatives Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to demonstrate your understanding of a literature synthesis of the practice problem. The DNP-prepared nurse uses the information to identify and seek grant funding to financially support the project and to begin writing a successful grant proposal.
Instructions
Review the lesson and readings from this week and respond to the following:
- Use a synthesis of research study evidence and non-research evidence to introduce the implications of the practice problem including the significance, mortality, and economic ramifications of the problem.
- Present your practice change idea to address your practice problem.
- Identify a potential non-research grant to support your evidence-based practice change initiative (these can often be in the form of quality improvement funding). Tip- look at the different nurse practitioner organizations for grant funding.
- Present a summary of the grant proposal requirements of the grant funding agency with deadline dates as applicable.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
- Critically appraise research as it applies to evidence-based practice to provide the most current and effective care to patient populations. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 8; POs 3, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 3 Advanced Practice Nurse Health Systems Leadership to Ensure Culturally Competent Care to Address Health Inequities Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to examine the role of the APN as a leader in healthcare delivery of high-quality, evidence-based care to culturally diverse populations who experience health inequities.
Instructions
Review the lesson and readings from this week and provide an example of how health system leaders can reduce health inequities to improve quality and outcomes.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
- Critically appraise research as it applies to evidence-based practice to provide the most current and effective care to patient populations. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 8; POs 3, 4, 9)
Advanced Practice Nurse Leadership to Ensure Culturally Competent Care Example
Health inequities refer to disparities in healthcare outcomes resulting from systemic, social, and economic factors that are avoidable, unfair, and unjust and can create unequal health opportunities (Lee et al., 2020). Culturally competent care is crucial in reducing health inequities. Advanced practice nurses (APNs) can significantly address health inequities by assuming leadership positions in healthcare systems. APNs are uniquely qualified to lead efforts to reduce health inequities by promoting culturally competent care.
Advanced practice nurse health system leaders are essential in reducing health inequities by implementing strategies that ensure culturally competent care to diverse populations. APNs can identify and address language barriers, cultural beliefs, and practices that may impact patient care (Swihart & Martin, 2022). They can also ensure culturally competent care by hiring a diverse workforce that reflects the patient population to be served. Culturally competent care must also be integrated into healthcare policies, procedures, and practices.
One example of how APN health system leaders can reduce health inequities is by addressing the mental health needs of culturally diverse populations. APNs can lead efforts to develop and implement evidence-based interventions that improve mental health outcomes for diverse populations by ensuring that mental health services are culturally appropriate and address the unique needs of patients from different backgrounds. APN leaders can also promote cultural competence by ensuring that interdisciplinary teams are trained in cultural sensitivity, communication, and awareness of the social determinants of health (Liu et al., 2022). Furthermore, APNs can advocate for policy changes that address health inequities by engaging in advocacy efforts to reduce healthcare disparities in underserved communities, such as policies on improved access to care for vulnerable populations.
As discussed above, advanced practice nurses can play a crucial role in reducing health inequities and ensuring culturally competent care. APN health system leaders can lead efforts to identify and address language barriers, cultural beliefs, and practices, hire a diverse workforce, and develop evidence-based interventions that are culturally appropriate. APN leaders can also engage in advocacy efforts to reduce healthcare disparities in underserved communities. These actions can help ensure all patients receive accessible, equitable, and culturally competent care.
References
Lee, H., Kim, D., Lee, S., & Fawcett, J. (2020). The concepts of health inequality, disparities, and equity in the era of population health. Applied Nursing Research, 56, 151367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2020.151367
Liu, T.-T., Chen, M.-Y., Chang, Y.-M., & Lin, M.-H. (2022). A preliminary study on the cultural competence of nurse practitioners and its affecting factors. Healthcare, 10(4), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10040678
Swihart, D. L., & Martin, R. L. (2022, November 14). Cultural religious competence in clinical practice. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493216/
NR 718 Week 3 Leading Evidence-Based Practice Change: Part 1 Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate clinical and health systems leadership by writing a grant proposal for an evidence-based practice change project to address a practice problem. You will use the practice problem identified in previous courses. This assignment focuses on the first part of a grant proposal:
- Specific Aims
- Background and Significance
- Translational Science Model
- Setting
Instructions
Review feedback from the discussion and write the beginning of the grant proposal that includes the following required content:
- Introduction (maximum of 1 paragraph): Provide a brief introduction that describes the following:
- Introduce the paper’s purpose and the importance of the practice change project.
- Describe intended accomplishments and long-term project goals.
- Provide a brief and defining statement of what will be discussed in the paper.
- Specific Aims (maximum of 1 paragraph)
- Describe what is hoped to be accomplished with the project, such as increased access or quality of care, etc.
- Background and Significance (maximum of 2 pages): This section lays out the reason for the grant proposal. It should make a clear, concise, and well-supported statement of the problem. The information provided should be both factual and directly related to the problem addressed by the grant proposal. The following should be addressed in this section:
- Define the purpose for developing the grant proposal.
- Identify the problem and address why this is a problem.
- Describe the nature of the problem. Provide as much evidence as possible, including the non-research data along with the research findings. Provide a synthesis of research study evidence and non-research evidence to introduce the implications of the practice problem that include the significance, mortality, and economic ramifications of the problem.
- Describe the stakeholders, who they are, and how they will benefit from the practice change project.
- Describe the specific way the problem(s) might be solved using the grant funding.
- Translational Science Model (maximum of 1 paragraph)
- Identify and briefly describe an appropriate translational science model to guide the project implementation.
- Setting (maximum of 1 paragraph)
- Describe the setting to include the type of organization (e.g., hospital, clinic, long-term care facility, etc.).
- Describe the specific population served by the organization.
- Describe the ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity of the community.
APA Guidelines
Use the current American Psychological Association (APA Manual) and the Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing a Professional Papers (located in the APA Basics section of the Writing Center) to complete this assignment. Follow these guidelines when completing each component. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
- Use the APA Paper Template (located in the Writing Center) to format this assignment.
- Turn on Grammarly to check the correctness of the grammar and punctuation as you write. (Note: if you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)
- Construct a title page using the APA paper template (Example: The Nurse Educator and Leading Social Change).
- Use the following prescribed Level I headings for the paper:
- Title of the paper for Introduction
- Specific Aims
- Background and Significance
- Translation Model
- Setting
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double-spaced pages
- 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
- Headings and subheadings
- In-text citations
- Title page
- Reference page
- Standard English usage and mechanics
- Organized presentation of ideas
Program Competencies
This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
- Utilize translation science to affect evidence-based practice change to impact quality and safety of patient care. (PCs 1, 3; POs 3, 5)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric
| Week 3 Assignment Grading Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction Requirements: 1. Introduce the paper’s purpose and the importance of the project. 2. Describe the intended accomplishments and long-term project goals. 3. Provide a brief and defining statement of what will be discussed in the paper. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good introduction. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic introduction. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor introduction. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpecific Aims Requirements: 1. Describe what is hoped to be accomplished with the project such as increased access or quality of care, etc. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the specific aims. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the specific aims. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the specific aims. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the specific aims. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBackground and Significance Requirements: 1. Define the purpose for developing the grant proposal. 2. Identify the practice problem and address why this is a problem. 3. Describe the nature of the problem. Provide as much evidence as possible, including the non-research data along with the research findings. Provide a synthesis of research study evidence and non-research evidence to introduce the implications of the practice problem that include the significance, mortality, and economic ramifications of the problem. 4. Describe the stakeholders, who they are, and how they will benefit. 5. Describe the specific way the problem(s) might be solved. | 50 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the background and significance. 45 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the background and significance. 40 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the background and significance. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the background and significance. | 50 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTranslational Science Model Requirements: 1. Identify and briefly describe an appropriate translational science model to guide the project implementation. | 30 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the translational science model. 27 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the translational science model. 24 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the translational science model. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the translational science model. epidemiology. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSetting Requirements: 1. Describe the setting to include the type of organization. 2. Describe the specific patient population served by the organization. 3. Describe the ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity of the community. | 30 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the setting. 27 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the setting. 24 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the setting. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the setting. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences Requirements: 1. Identify and list scholarly sources and other sources on the reference pages. 2. List sources in alphabetical order. 3. Use correct hanging-indent format. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides excellent references. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good references. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic references. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor references. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization for Scholarly Papers Requirements: 1. Use prescribed Level I headers as described in the assignment guidelines. 2. Reference and citations are in current APA style. 3. Paper length is 3-4 pages, excluding title and reference pages. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides excellent APA style and organization. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good APA style and organization. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic APA style and organization. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor APA style and organization. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing Requirements: 1. Use of Standard English usage and mechanics 2. No spelling or typographical errors 3. Organized presentation of ideas | 30 pts Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing. 27 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good clarity of writing. 24 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic clarity of writing. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor clarity of writing. | 30 pts |
| Total Points: 200 | ||
NR 718 Week 4 Advanced Practice Nurse Clinical and Health Systems Leadership in Action: The Evaluation Plan Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to develop an evaluation plan for the grant proposal.
Instructions
Review the lesson and readings from this week. Continuing with the practice problem you identified in the Week 3 Assignment, respond to the following:
- Identify the primary outcome(s) for your evidence-based intervention.
- Describe how this will be measured (i.e., how the evidence-based intervention will be evaluated when it is fully implemented).
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
- Utilize translation science to affect evidence-based practice change to impact quality and safety of patient care. (PCs 1, 3; POs 3, 5)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
- Critically appraise research as it applies to evidence-based practice to provide the most current and effective care to patient populations. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 8; POs 3, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 5 Advanced Practice Nurse as Clinical and Health Systems Leader to Promote Quality and Safety Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to examine the role of the APN as a clinical and health systems leader to promote quality and safety.
Instructions
Review the lesson and readings from this week and respond to the following:
Examine a quality or safety initiative at your organization. Explain how the problem was identified and what evidence-based intervention was implemented to address the problem.
As a clinical or health systems leader, how would you determine if the evidence-based intervention was successful?
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
Utilize translation science to affect evidence-based practice change to impact quality and safety of patient care. (PCs 1, 3; POs 3, 5)
Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 5 Leading Evidence-Based Practice Change: Part 2 Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to develop competency in writing a grant proposal for the National Practice Problem idea you identified in Week 3. You will continue to build on the practice problem and the evidence-based intervention in this part of the assignment. This assignment focuses on the second part of a grant proposal:
- Interventions/Approach
- Data Collection Instruments
- Outcomes (Evaluation Plan)
- Data Collection Method
- Protection of Participants
Instructions
Continue writing the grant proposal and include the following required content:
- Introduction: Provide a brief introduction that describes the following:
- Introduce the paper’s purpose and the importance of the practice change project.
- Describe the intended accomplishments and long-term project goals.
- Provide a brief and defining statement of what will be discussed in the paper.
- Interventions/Approach
- Provide a synthesis of evidence to support the evidence-based intervention for the selected problem. Include 3 current Level I, II, or III peer-reviewed primary research studies and/or systematic reviews.
- Synthesis of the literature (maximum of 2 paragraphs)
- Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
- Synthesize the main themes and salient points that emerge from a synthesis of research evidence.
- Compare and contrast the main points from a synthesis of research evidence.
- Presents an overarching synthesis of evidence about the intervention.
- Provides objective rationale for the intervention based on the literature.
- Includes a minimum of three peer-reviewed research studies that support the intervention. Enter these on the Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool.
- Data Collection Instruments
- Describe the data collection instrument(s) you intend to use to measure the outcomes of the project. If collecting the data from the EHR, discuss the details of who will collect the data, how, and the specific data to be collected. Include the data about the reliability and validity for surveys and questionnaires if used.
- Data Collection Methods
- Describe the method or process for data collection including how often measurements will be taken. Describe how, when, where, and who will collect the data.
- Outcomes (Evaluation Plan)
- Explain the primary outcome for your evidence-based intervention.
- Explain how the success of the project will be evaluated when it is fully implemented. This is a discussion about the outcome and the relationship between project success and the outcome(s).
- Protection of Participants
- Examine potential risks to the participants.
- Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
- Include 3 Level I, II, or III research articles or systematic reviews.
- Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and levels of evidence.
- Insert your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as an Appendix.
APA Guidelines
Use the current American Psychological Association (APA Manual) and the Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing a Professional Papers (located in the APA Basics section of the Writing Center) to complete this assignment. Follow these guidelines when completing each component. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
- Use the APA Paper Template (located in the Writing Center) to format this assignment.
- Turn on Grammarly to check the correctness of the grammar and punctuation as you write. (Note: if you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)
- Construct a title page using the APA paper template (Example: The Nurse Educator and Leading Social Change).
- Use the following prescribed Level I headings for the paper:
- Title of paper for introduction header
- Intervention
- Data Collection Instruments
- Data Collection Method
- Outcomes (Evaluation Plan)
- Protection of Participants
- Appendix Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 3-4 pages (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double-spaced pages
- 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
- Headings and subheadings
- In-text citations
- Title page
- Reference page
- Standard English usage and mechanics
- Organized presentation of ideas
Program Competencies
This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
- Utilize translation science to affect evidence-based practice change to impact quality and safety of patient care. (PCs 1, 3; POs 3, 5)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
- Critically appraise research as it applies to evidence-based practice to provide the most current and effective care to patient populations. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 8; POs 3, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 5 Assignment Grading Rubric
| Week 5 Assignment Grading Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction Requirements: Provide a brief introduction that describes: 1. Introduce the paper’s purpose and the importance of the practice change project. 2. Describe the intended accomplishments and long-term project goals. 3. Provide a brief and defining statement of what will be discussed in the paper. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good introduction. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic introduction. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor introduction. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterventions/Approach Requirements: Synthesis of the literature (maximum of 2 paragraphs) 1. Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper. 2. Synthesize the main themes and salient points that emerge from a synthesis of research evidence. 3. Compare and contrast the main points from a synthesis of research evidence. 4. Presents an overarching synthesis of evidence about the intervention. 5. Provides objective rationale for the intervention based on the literature. 6. Includes a minimum of three peer-reviewed research studies that support the intervention. Enter these on the Johns Hopkins Individual Summary Tool. | 30 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the interventions/approach. 27 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the interventions/approach. 24 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the interventions/approach. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the interventions/approach. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Instruments Requirements: 1. Describe the instruments you intend to use to measure the outcomes of the project. 2. If collecting the data from the EHR, discuss the details of who will collect the EHR data and the specific data to be collected. 3. Include the data about the reliability and validity testing for surveys and questionnaires if used. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the instrument(s). 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the instruments. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the instruments. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the instruments. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Methods Requirements: 1. Describe the method or process including how often measurements will be taken. Describe how, when, where, and who will collect the data. | 30 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the data collection. 27 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the data collection. 24 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the data collection. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the data collection. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOutcome and Process Measures (Evaluation Plan) Requirements: 1. Explain the primary outcomes for your evidence-based intervention. 2. Explain how the success of the project will be evaluated when it is fully implemented. | 30 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the outcome and process measures. 27 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the outcome and process measures. 24 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the outcome and process measures. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the outcome and process measures. | 30 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProtection of Participants Requirements: 1. Examine potential risks to the participants. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the protection of participants. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the protection of participants. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the protection of participants. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the protection of participants. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix Requirements: 1. Include three Level I, II, or III research studies. 2. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence. 3. Insert your completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as an Appendix. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth summary tool. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient summary tool. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial summary tool. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped completed summary tool. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences Requirements: 1. Identify and list scholarly sources on the reference pages. 2. Identify and list other scholarly sources used in the paper on the reference pages. 3. List scholarly sources in alphabetical order. 4. Use correct hanging-indent format. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides excellent references. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good references. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and provides basic references. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor references. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization for Scholarly Papers Requirements: 1. Use prescribed Level I headers as described in the assignment guidelines. 2. Reference and citations are in current APA style. 3. Paper length is 3-4 pages, excluding title and reference pages. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides excellent APA style and organization. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good APA style and organization. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic APA style and organization. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor APA style and organization. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing Requirements: 1. Use of Standard English usage and mechanics 2. No spelling or typographical errors 3. Organized presentation of ideas | 20 pts Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good clarity of writing. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic clarity of writing. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor clarity of writing. | 20 pts |
| Total Points: 200 | ||
NR 718 Week 6 Advanced Practice Nurse as Clinical and Health Systems Leader: Funding Grant Proposals Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to explore the financial aspects of a grant proposal.
Instructions
Review this week’s lesson and readings and respond to the following:
- Explore and examine areas where you may have expenses associated with your grant proposal (specific dollar amounts are not required).
- Justify the expenses that you will be presenting in your grant proposal.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 7 Advanced Practice Nurse and Scope of Practice Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to explore the crucial role of the APN as a leader to impact the scope of practice and regulation.
Instructions
Review the lesson and readings from this week and respond to the following:
- Describe the APN scope of practice in your state.
- Examine how APN practice restrictions impact access to healthcare.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
- Utilize translation science to affect evidence-based practice change to impact quality and safety of patient care. (PCs 1, 3; POs 3, 5)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
- Critically appraise research as it applies to evidence-based practice to provide the most current and effective care to patient populations. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 8; POs 3, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 7 Leading Evidence-Based Practice Change: Part 3 Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate clinical and health systems leadership by writing a grant proposal for an evidence-based practice change project to address the practice problem discussed in Week 3 and Week 5. This assignment focuses on the final version of a grant proposal:
- Specific Aims
- Background and Significance
- Translational Science Model
- Setting
- Interventions/Approach
- Data Collection Instruments
- Data Collection Method
- Outcomes (Evaluation Plan)
- Protection of Participants
- Budget
- Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Instructions
Review faculty feedback from the Week 3 and Week 5 assignments, update the paper, and add the budget section to finalize the grant proposal. Include the following required content:
- Introduction:
- Describe the paper’s purpose and the importance of the practice change project.
- Describe the intended accomplishments and long-term project goals.
- Provide a brief and defining statement of what will be discussed in the paper.
- Specific Aims (maximum of 1 paragraph)
- Describe what is hoped to be accomplished with the project such as increased access or quality of care, etc.
- Background and Significance (maximum of 2 pages): This section lays out the reason for the proposal. It should make a clear, concise, and well supported statement of the problem. The information provided should be both factual and directly related to the problem addressed by the proposal. The following should be addressed in this section:
- Define the purpose for developing the grant proposal.
- Identify the problem and address why this is a problem.
- Describe the nature of the problem. Provide as much evidence as possible, including the non-research data along with the research findings. Provide a synthesis of research study evidence and non-research evidence to introduce the implications of the practice problem that include the significance, mortality, and economic ramifications of the problem.
- Describe the stakeholders, who they are, and how they will benefit.
- Describe the specific way the problem(s) might be solved through the grant funding.
- Translational Science Model (maximum of 1 paragraph)
- Identify and briefly describe an appropriate translational science model to guide the project implementation.
- Setting (maximum of 1 paragraph)
- Describe the setting to include the type of organization (e.g., hospital, clinic, long-term care facility, etc.).
- Describe the specific population served by the organization.
- Describe the ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity of the community.
- Interventions/Approach
- Provide a synthesis of evidence to support the evidence-based intervention for the selected problem. Include 3 current Level I, II, or III peer-reviewed primary research studies and/or systematic reviews.
- Synthesis of the literature (maximum of 2 paragraphs):
- Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper.
- Synthesize the main themes and salient points that emerge from a synthesis of research evidence.
- Compare and contrast the main points from a synthesis of research evidence.
- Presents an overarching synthesis of evidence about the intervention.
- Provides objective rationale for the intervention based on the literature.
- Data Collection Instruments
- Describe the instruments you intend to use to measure the outcomes of the project. If collecting the data from the EHR, discuss the details of who will collect the EHR data and the specific data to be collected. Include the data about the reliability and validity testing for surveys and questionnaires if used.
- Data Collection Method
- Describe the method or process including how often measurements will be taken. Describe how, when, where, and who will collect the data.
- Outcome (Evaluation Plan)
- Explain the primary outcome for your evidence-based intervention.
- Explain how the success of the project will be evaluated when it is fully implemented.
- Protection of Participants
- Examine potential risks to the participants.
- Budget
- Explore areas where you may have expenses associated with your grant proposal (specific dollar amounts are not required).
- Justify the expenses that you will be presenting in your grant proposal.
- Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
- Include 3 Level I, II, or III research studies or systematic reviews.
- Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence.
- Attach completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as Appendix.
APA Guidelines
Use the current American Psychological Association (APA Manual) and the Chamberlain Guidelines for Writing a Professional Papers (located in the APA Basics section of the Writing Center) to complete this assignment. Follow these guidelines when completing each component. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
- Use the APA Paper Template (located in the Writing Center) to format this assignment.
- Turn on Grammarly to check the correctness of the grammar and punctuation as you write. (Note: if you have not already done so, please download the free version at Grammarly.com before construction of the assignment.)
- Construct a title page using the APA paper template (Example: The Nurse Educator and Leading Social Change).
- Use the following prescribed Level I headings for the paper:
- Title of paper for introduction header
- Specific Aims
- Background and Significance
- Translational Science Model
- Setting
- Interventions/Approach
- Data Collection Instruments
- Data Collection Method
- Outcomes (Evaluation Plan)
- Protection of Participants
- Budget
- Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool
Writing Requirements (APA format)
- Length: 6-8 pages (not including title page or references page)
- 1-inch margins
- Double-spaced pages
- 12-point Times New Roman or 11-point Arial font
- Headings and subheadings
- In-text citations
- Title page
- Reference page
- Standard English usage and mechanics
- Organized presentation of ideas
Program Competencies
This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
- Utilize translation science to affect evidence-based practice change to impact quality and safety of patient care. (PCs 1, 3; POs 3, 5)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
- Critically appraise research as it applies to evidence-based practice to provide the most current and effective care to patient populations. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 8; POs 3, 4, 9)
NR 718 Week 7 Assignment Grading Rubric
| Week 7 Assignment Grading Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction Requirements: 1. Introduce the paper’s purpose and the importance of the practice change project. 2. Describe the intended accomplishments and long-term project goals. 3. Provide a brief and defining statement of what will be discussed in the paper. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent introduction. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good introduction. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic introduction. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor introduction. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpecific Aims Requirements: 1. Describe what is hoped to be accomplished with the project such as increased access or quality of care, etc. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the specific aims. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the specific aims. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the specific aims. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the specific aims. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBackground and Significance Requirements: 1. Define the purpose for developing the grant proposal. 2. Identify the problem and address why this is a problem. 3. Describe the nature of the problem. Provide as much evidence as possible, including the non-research data along with the research findings. Provide a synthesis of research study evidence and non-research evidence to introduce the implications of the practice problem that include the significance, mortality, and economic ramifications of the problem. 4. Describe the stakeholders, who they are, and how they will benefit. 5. Describe the specific way the problem(s) might be solved. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the background and significance. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the background and significance. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the background and significance. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the background and significance. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTranslational Science Model Requirements: 1. Identify and briefly describe an appropriate translational science model to guide the project implementation. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the translational science model. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the translational science model. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the translational science model. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the translational science model. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSetting Requirements: 1. Describe the setting to include the type of organization. 2. Describe the specific population served by the organization. 3. Describe the ethnic, racial, and cultural diversity of the community. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the setting. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the setting. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the setting. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the setting. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInterventions/Approach Requirements: Synthesis of the literature (maximum of 2 paragraphs) 1. Use a synthesis of research evidence when writing this section of the paper. 2. Synthesize the main themes and salient points that emerge from a synthesis of the research evidence. 3. Compare and contrast the main points from a synthesis of research evidence. 4. Presents an overarching synthesis of evidence about the intervention. 5. Provides objective rationale for the intervention based on the literature. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the interventions/approach. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the interventions/approach. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the interventions/approach. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the interventions/approach. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Instruments Requirements: 1. Describe the instruments you intend to use to measure the outcomes of the project. 2. If collecting the data from the EHR, discuss the details of who will collect the EHR data and the specific data to be collected. 3. Include the data about the reliability and validity testing for surveys and questionnaires if used. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent description of the instruments. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good description of the instruments. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic description of the instruments. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor description of the instruments. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection Method Requirements: 1. Describe the method or process including how often measurements will be taken. Describe how, when, where, and who will collect the data. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the data collection. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the data collection. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the data collection. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the data collection. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOutcome and Evaluation Plan Requirements: 1. Explain the primary outcome for your evidence-based intervention. 2. Explain how the success of the project will be evaluated when it is fully implemented. | 20 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the outcome and process measures. 18 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the outcome and process measures. 16 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the outcome and evaluation plan. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the outcome and process measures. | 20 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProtection of Participants Requirements: 1. Examine potential risks to the participants. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the protection of participants. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the protection of participants. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the protection of participants. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the protection of participants. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBudget Requirements: 1. Explore areas where you may experience costs associated with your grant proposal (specific dollar amounts are not required). 2. Justify the costs that you will be presenting in your grant proposal. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an excellent discussion of the budget. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a very good discussion of the budget. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic discussion of the budget. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a poor discussion of the budget. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppendix Requirements: 1. Include three Level I, II, or III research studies. 2. Complete all sections completely and identify the quality and the levels of evidence. 3. Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool as Appendix. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides an in-depth summary tool. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides a sufficient summary tool. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a partial summary tool. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or an undeveloped completed summary tool. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences Requirements: 1. Identify and list scholarly sources on the reference pages. 2. Identify and list other scholarly sources used in the paper on the reference pages. 3. List scholarly sources in alphabetical order. 4. Use correct hanging-indent format. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides excellent references. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good references. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic references. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor references. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style and Organization for Scholarly Papers Requirements: 1. Use prescribed Level I headers as described in the assignment guidelines. 2. Reference and citations are in current APA style. 3. Paper length is 6-8 pages, excluding title and reference pages. | 10 pts Includes all requirements and provides excellent APA style and organization. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good APA style and organization. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides a basic APA style and organization. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor APA style and organization. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity of Writing Requirements: 1. Use of Standard English usage and mechanics 2. No spelling or typographical errors 3. Organized presentation of ideas | 10 pts Includes all requirements and demonstrates excellent clarity of writing. 9 pts Includes all requirements and provides very good clarity of writing. 8 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides basic clarity of writing. 0 pts Includes fewer than all requirements and/or provides poor clarity of writing. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRevisions Requirements: 1. Revisions done based on course faculty feedback from Weeks 3 and 5 Assignments. | 20 pts Substantial revisions have been made based on course faculty feedback on the Weeks 3 and 5 assignments. 0 pts Limited or no revisions have been made based on course faculty feedback on the Weeks 3 and 5 assignments. | 20 pts |
| Total Points: 200 | ||
NR 718 Week 8 Reflection on Learning and Practice Readiness Discussion
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is to reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP-prepared APN and consider what you learned in this course and how this knowledge will impact your practice.
Instructions
Each week, you have been reminded that reflective inquiry allows for expansion of self-awareness, identification of knowledge gaps, and assessment of learning goals. As you reflect on your own readiness to practice as a DNP-prepared APN, it is important to consider what you learned in this course.
As you review the course outcomes and your experience in this course, address the following:
- Analyze and evaluate how your thinking was challenged in this course related to leadership as an APN.
- Considering this new knowledge, examine how this learning prepares you to practice as a DNP-prepared APN leader.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): DNP Discussion GuidelinesLinks to an external site.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
- Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
- Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
- Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Identify advanced practice leadership competencies. (PCs 2, 4, 5; POs 2, 6)
- Apply various strategies to improve access to quality, cost-effective healthcare. (PCs 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 4, 9)
- Utilize translation science to affect evidence-based practice change to impact quality and safety of patient care. (PCs 1, 3; POs 3, 5)
- Translate research into clinical practice to provide optimal wellness and disease prevention throughout the patient population. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 9)
- Critically appraise research as it applies to evidence-based practice to provide the most current and effective care to patient populations. (PCs 1, 3, 5, 8; POs 3, 4, 9)
