NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study
NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution
The first step before starting to write the NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment.
It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list.
You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.
How to Write the Body for NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study
In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319
Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.
NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study Instructions
Purpose
The purpose of this discussion is for you to investigate telehealth and technology relationships to social justice principles. Have a look at NR706 Week 4 Discussion | Translating Evidence Into Practice.
Case Study Scenario
Watch the following video.
Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study (1:55)
Transcript
[MUSIC] Mr. Kasich is a 77-year old who was recently taken to the emergency room after he fell when trying to get out of bed. There, he was found to have a blood glucose level of 35 milligrams per deciliter and was diagnosed with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypoglycemia despite many years of well-maintained the blood glucose levels.
After further assessment, Mr. Kasich was transferred to a medical room in the hospital. His background includes diagnosed with type two diabetes mellitus, advanced congestive heart failure and lung cancer. Has Medicare parts A and B. Lives with wife in a remote area that is 40 miles from the closest healthcare provider. Is proficient using his home computer.
Mr. Lane is a 42-year old who was admitted for exacerbation of heart failure. His background includes has diabetes mellitus type two. Is a long-haul truck driver with a large trucking company. Is privately insured. Is single and primarily lives in his truck. Both Mr. Kasich and Mr. Lane are going home with telehealth consisting of a telemonitoring device that transmits weight, blood pressure, blood glucose levels and pulse oximetry to a remote telehealth nurse.
Even though the use of telehealth does not often include hands on interaction, the goal of keeping patients out of a hospital is consistent with quality nursing practice. Telehealth applications are designed to enhance the patient experience and improve clinical outcomes while providing care for patients in their home environment rather than an institutional setting. Telehealth supports self-care by empowering patients, which is a central tenet of nursing practice.
Instructions
Review the case scenario above and address the following:
- Examine concepts such as equity, respect, self-determinism, health literacy, cyclic disadvantage, and healthcare disparities among marginalized populations or groups and how they affect patient outcomes.
- Compare and contrast how each patient in the video may benefit from telehealth services and the ethical considerations from the viewpoint of the nurse.
- Propose barriers that must be removed to achieve well-being, sufficiency, and healthcare access for all.
Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:
- Link (webpage): Graduate Discussion Grading Guidelines and Rubric.
Program Competencies
This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:
- Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
- Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
Course Outcomes
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
- Design programs that monitor and evaluate outcomes of care, care systems, and quality improvement. (PC 4; PO 7)
- Evaluate the types of healthcare information systems, knowledge-based systems, and patient care technology and the impact on patient safety, quality of care, and outcome measurement. (PC 4; PO 7)
- Appraise consumer health information sources for accuracy, timeliness, and appropriateness. (PC 4; PO 7)
- Resolve ethical and legal issues related to the use of information, communication networks, and information and patient care technology. (PCs 2, 4; PO 6)
NR 706 Week 3 Discussion | Consumer Informatics/Telehealth Case Study Example
Examine concepts such as equity, respect, self-determination, health literacy, cyclical disadvantage, and healthcare disparities among marginalized populations or groups, and how they impact patient outcomes.
Healthcare disparities refer to the differences in access to healthcare resources and health outcomes that exist due to patients’ race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (Conway & Satin, 2022). Disparities are caused by environmental, social, and economic factors that lead to barriers to accessing healthcare, lack of adequate resources, and inadequate health literacy (Conway & Satin, 2022).
Equity entails the fair distribution of services and healthcare resources to all persons, regardless of their backgrounds (Liburd et al., 2020). It is essential for addressing healthcare disparities and promoting health equity. Self-determination and respect must also be factored in when providing marginalized populations with healthcare services. Clients should be handled with respect, dignity, and empathy, and should make informed decisions on their care.
Many marginalized individuals lack access to accurate and comprehensive health information. A lack of information about health concepts may lead patients to forgo seeking healthcare services when needed (Nutbeam & Lloyd, 2020). A comprehensive approach that addresses the social determinants of health, promotes self-determination, respect, and equity, should be adopted to address healthcare disparities. All individuals should be provided equal healthcare regardless of their background.
Compare and contrast how each patient in the video may benefit from telehealth services and the ethical considerations from the viewpoint of the nurse.
Due to the extended distance from the hospital, Mr. Kasich can benefit from telehealth services. The telemonitoring machine can help monitor the patient’s status, and the physicians can use telehealth to relay information to him about self-care. This way, he does not need to visit the hospital physically. The patient’s chronic conditions require frequent monitoring of his vital signs to note deviations from the baseline early and implement interventions before complications develop.
The patient is eligible for continuous glucose monitoring, which enables him to keep his blood glucose levels in check and report the findings to the healthcare providers who can provide further guidance. Mr. Lane will also benefit from telehealth as he spends much of his time at work. He cannot visit healthcare facilities as he is on the move when he needs the care. Telehealth can help him stay in touch with his caregivers without having to visit the hospital in person, allowing him to avoid missing work.
Propose barriers that must be removed to achieve well-being, sufficiency, and healthcare access for all.
The lack of insurance coverage for all populations must be addressed. When individuals lack insurance, they may be unable to meet the costs incurred when accessing healthcare, making them hesitant to visit healthcare facilities when they need care (Hojat, 2022). A lack of transportation to and from the facilities may prevent some people from attending appointments, despite needing medical attention.
Hospitals should conduct clinics in community settings, such as places far away from the hospital, to ensure that all individuals in need of healthcare receive essential services (Hojat, 2022). The stigma and discrimination facing marginalized populations must be addressed, as they affect these individuals emotionally and lead them not to seek healthcare services. The cost of healthcare, especially in the medications for chronic conditions, should be addressed to ensure that people with multiple comorbidities can afford the medicines prescribed.
References
Conway, A., & Satin, D. (2022). The role of pay-for-performance in reducing healthcare disparities: A narrative literature review. Preventive Medicine, 107274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107274
Hojat, L. S. (2022). Breaking down the barriers to health equity. Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease, 9, 204993612210794. https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361221079453
Liburd, L. C., Hall, J. E., Mpofu, J. J., Marshall Williams, S., Bouye, K., & Penman-Aguilar, A. (2020). Addressing health equity in public health practice: Frameworks, promising strategies, and measurement considerations. Annual Review of Public Health, 41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094119
Nutbeam, D., & Lloyd, J. E. (2020). Understanding and responding to health literacy as a social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102529