NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 

NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3  – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of the graded collaborative discussions is to engage faculty and students in an interactive dialogue to assist the student in appraising data to improve population health outcomes. Meaningful dialogue among faculty and students fosters the development of a learning community as ideas, perspectives, and knowledge are shared. This discussion will support the professional formation of the nurse practitioner (NP) role. Have a look at NR507 Week 8 Collaboration Café Discussion.

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:   

  • CO 1: Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states across the lifespan. 
  • CO 2: Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions across the lifespan. 
  • CO 3: Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states across the lifespan.      
  • CO 4: Integrate advanced pathophysiological concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of health problems in selected populations.
  • CO 5: Relate research findings to the management of patients with complex pathophysiologic dysfunction. 

Due Date

Initial posts are due to the discussion forum by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Instructor and peer responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Students must post on a minimum of two separate days. A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday (i.e., the student will receive an automatic 0). 

Total Points Possible: 50

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. 

General Instructions 

This discussion represents the third and final step in a three-step discussion series where you will choose your pathophysiology adventure to analyze and present to the class. You will continue to explore the disease process that you chose in Week 2. In this final step of the discussion series, you will present the case study that you created in Week 5 on your chosen disease process from Week 2 to the class using the required template.

Your presentation will be recorded in video format using Kaltura and should be presented as if you are teaching the client who was just diagnosed with your chosen condition from Week 2 and their family. You will then do a peer review for another student who chose a different condition. This link Links to an external site can provide information on how to use Kaltura to record your presentation after signing in with your Chamberlain University student credentials.

Include the following sections:  

1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.  

  1. Prepare a presentation using the required template. The presentation should incorporate the case study you created in Week 5 and the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis of your selected condition as if you are teaching it to the client in the case study. For images of the client for the case study, free stock images are available from Adobe Stock.  
  2. Record your presentation in a video format (~2-5 min) using Kaltura. Ensure clarity in the audio and visual elements of the presentation. 
  3. Submit the Kaltura recording link of your presentation in your discussion post.  
  4. After posting your presentation link, watch the presentation of one of your classmates with a different condition. Provide a response to their post offering constructive feedback focusing on the accuracy of the information, their presentation skills, and whether the presentation is appropriately targeted to the client in the case study. 

2. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:  

  1. Cite a scholarly source in the initial post. 
  2. Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post. 
  3. Cite a scholarly source in one peer post. 
  4. Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.  
  5. Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations. 

3. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.  

  1. Peer Response: Respond to at least one peer on a topic other than the initially assigned topic.  
  2. Faculty Response: Respond to at least one faculty post.  
  3. Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.  

4. Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.  

5. Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references free of errors.  

6. Wednesday Participation Requirement: Provide a substantive response to the graded discussion topic (not a response to a peer or faculty), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.  

7. Total Participation Requirement: Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.   

**To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.

NR 507 Week 7 Discussion Choose Your Own Pathophysiology Adventure: Part 3 of 3 Example

Pathophysiological Adventure for HIV/AIDS

Hello Joe. My name is _. I am a Nurse Practitioner, and I am here to talk about your diagnosis. You have been diagnosed with HIV/AIDS, and we will discuss its pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, and your condition’s diagnosis. I know this diagnosis can be quite overwhelming, but I am here to help you understand what it means, how it is diagnosed, and later its management.

The diagnostic tests done, such as ELISA, CD4 cells, and viral load tests, confirm the diagnosis, while the X-ray shows a side effect of the diagnosis. Your work and social history are also significant risk factors for the conditions. The review of systems also show that you have persistent fatigue, white patches on the tongue, a productive cough, recurrent diarrhea, muscle and joint pain, and swollen lymph nodes in the neck and armpit regions which are important for your diagnosis. We will now discuss the disease’s pathophysiology.

Pathophysiology of the Condition

HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) is the virus that attacks your body’s immune system, specifically the CD4 cells (T cells). The disease initially produces flu-like symptoms after massive infiltration of the CD4 cells and inflammation. Still, it is self-limiting as the body’s immune system is activated and the progression of CD4 cell attack slows. Swinkels et al. (2024) note that the virus enters your CD4 cells, replicates, and destroys them, weakening their immune systems.

If the virus is not managed, the decreased immunity makes your body more susceptible to infections and certain cancers. Swinkels et al. (2024) state that HIV infection advances in three stages: Acute Infection, The initial stage with flu-like symptoms; clinical Latency, where HIV continues to multiply but at lower levels; you might not feel sick or present with any symptoms; and AIDS, a severe stage with significant immune system damage, leading to opportunistic infections.

Clinical Manifestations of the Condition

Now, let us go through the signs and symptoms of the different HIV stages. During the first stage, the symptoms occur 2-4 weeks after initial viral exposure, including fever, swollen lymph nodes, sore throat, rash, diarrhea, weight loss, and night sweats. The second stage is often asymptomatic and can last for years, depending on access to treatment and health measures. Common symptoms include frequent mild infections, persistent fatigue, swollen lymph nodes, and night sweats.

The final stage, AIDS, is the most severe stage of HIV infection and occurs when the system is severely damaged. It is characterized by immune deficiency and various opportunistic infections. The symptoms include Persistent fever, severe weight loss, chronic diarrhea, night sweats, oral thrush, and neurological issues such as confusion. Clinical examinations often reveal a very low CD4 count and a high viral load.

Diagnosis of the Condition

There are various tests used to diagnose HIV/AIDS. Tsoi et al. (2022) note that these laboratory tests include the ELISA test and Western Blot test, where the Western Blot Test acts as a confirmatory test. Ding and He (2024) note that the CD4 count and viral load are not baseline tests for HIV but help in informing management and patient progress/response to treatment interventions. These tests have already been performed on you.

The results are as follows: HIV ELISA Test: Positive, Western Blot Test: Positive, CD4 Count: 200 cells/mm³ (indicating advanced HIV infection), Viral Load: High, Complete Blood Count (CBC): Low white blood cell count, Chest X-ray: Right lung lobar consolidation (suggestive of pneumonia or tuberculosis), and the Sputum Test was negative for tuberculosis. These tests support your diagnosis. At this point, I welcome any questions you might have regarding your diagnosis.

References

Ding, Y., & He, N. (2021). HIV and pulmonary hypertension: CD4 and viral load matter. The Lancet Healthy Longevity2(7), e389-e390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00137-9

Swinkels, H. M., Vaillant, A. A. J., Nguyen, A. D., & Gulick, P. G. (2024). HIV and AIDS. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK534860/

Tsoi, B. W., Parker, M., Fine, S. M., McGowan, J. P., Vail, R., Merrick, S. T., Radix, A., Gonzalez, C. ., & Hoffmann, C. J. (2022). HIV testing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK581840/