NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change Instructions

Complete a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization with which you are familiar, in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds upon the work you have completed in previous assessments. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented. Have a look at NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 3 Business Case for Change.

As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.

Background and Context

As a master’s-level health care practitioner, you may sometimes be tasked with the need to complete a systematic evaluation as a way of improving your organization’s outcomes. In this assessment, you will have a chance to practice these skills by completing a systematic evaluation of a unit, facility, or organization that you are familiar with in an attempt to identify the need to address the economic health care issue that you presented in the previous assessment. This systematic evaluation is often referred to as a needs analysis. Understanding how to do a needs analysis will be key as you advance through your career in the health care environment.

Instructions

Be sure to address each main point. Review the assessment instructions and scoring guide, including performance-level descriptions for each criterion, to ensure you understand the work you will be asked to complete and how it will be assessed. In addition, note the requirements for document format and length and for supporting evidence.

Overall, you will be assessed on the following criteria:

  • Summarize your chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
    • Reiterate your rationale for pursuing this issue, as well as the gap contributing to it that you identified in your previous assessment.
    • Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
      • Use at least one piece of evidence to support this disparity (public health data, aggregated data from an organization, or other scholarly resources).
    • Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
      • For example, if your implementation plan includes the need for increased staffing, you might want to research errors or patient falls that occurred as a result of high patient and low staff ratio in the literature.
      • Use at least four evidence-based or scholarly sources that are relevant to your chosen topic to support your explanation.
    • Explain the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.
      • Outcomes and opportunities for growth should focus on economic considerations.
    • Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
Additional Requirements
  • Length of Submission: 3–5 double-spaced pages.
    • Number of References: Cite at least four sources of evidence to support your identification of the gap. This could be public health data, a peer-reviewed journal article, or another scholarly source.
    • APA formatting: Titles, headings, resources, and citations are formatted according to the current APA style.

Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze the effects of financial and economic factors (such as cost-benefit, supply and demand, return on investment, and risks) in a health care system on patient care, services offered, and organizational structures and operation.
    • Summarize the chosen economic issue and its impact on your work, organization, colleagues, and community.
    • Competency 2: Develop ethical and culturally equitable solutions to economic problems within a health care organization in an effort to improve the quality of care and services offered.
      • Identify any socioeconomic or diversity disparities that exist with how your chosen economic issue impacts any particular groups or populations.
    • Competency 3: Justify the qualitative and quantitative information used to guide economic decision making to stakeholders and colleagues.
      • Explain the findings of evidence-based or scholarly sources regarding the need to address your chosen issue and pursue potential change or implementation plans.
    • Competency 4: Develop ethical and culturally equitable economic strategies to address dynamic environmental forces and ensure the future security of an organization’s resources and its ability to provide quality care.
      • Explain the predicted outcomes and opportunities for growth as the result of the proposed change or implementation plan.
    • Competency 5: Produce clear, coherent, and professional written work, in accordance with Capella writing standards.
      • Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

NHS-FPX6008 Assessment 2 Needs Analysis for Change Example

Need Analysis for Change

Healthcare improvement focuses on improving efficiency, efficacy, and quality. Changes can occur in any area and may be influenced by various factors, such as increased error rates, shifting patient and environmental needs, policy/political factors, or technological advancements. Implementing change in any institution, including healthcare, requires a thorough background analysis to ensure the change is best suited for the facility. Understanding the current situation in an area helps determine if there is a need for change and implement it accordingly. The previously identified healthcare economic issue is healthcare insurance coverage. This essay evaluates the necessity for change in a healthcare facility to address the identified issues.

Health Insurance Coverage Impact on Work, Organization, Colleagues, And Community

Healthcare insurance coverage is the problem of interest in this assessment. The economic issue affects access to healthcare services. Healthcare access refers to affordability and availability. Shami et al. (2019) note that health insurance coverage makes services more affordable and accessible, thereby highlighting its significance in care delivery. Private and public health insurance coverage are the primary payers in the healthcare system. Funds from insurers are used to operate a majority of healthcare services, including purchasing medications, paying utilities, and managing care programs (Erlangga et al., 2019).

Insurance firms’ reimbursement also facilitates daily activities such as paying cleaners and delivering medical supplies and thus significantly affects the organization and workflow. Healthcare in the United States is expensive, and most individuals cannot afford out-of-pocket payments. Insurance coverage ensures the smooth running of activities and thus affects my work and other care providers.

Healthcare insurance coverage has a significant impact on the community in various ways. Some services, such as MRI and other diagnostic procedures, are costly but covered by insurance (Geethanath & Vaughan, 2019). Insurance coverage ensures care equity, allowing every insured community member to access the services they need from the facility, regardless of their financial limitations. The community is left responsible for caring for sick patients and helping with hospital bills. Thus, insurance coverage is a significant economic issue that affects my work, the organization, my colleagues, and the communities we serve.

Rationale and Gap Contributing to it.

The reason for selecting the healthcare economic issue is its potential to affect healthcare access and quality. The healthcare insurance coverage rate directly relates to health access and outcomes (Courtemanche et al., 2019). Keisler-Starkey et al. (2020) note that insurance coverage affects the quality, availability, and affordability of care services, and these effects were the basis for the ACA’s Medicaid expansion to ensure a more substantial portion of the population has access to insurance services. The gap contributing to it is health insurance literacy. Health insurance literacy determines their utilization, and individuals must understand the availability and importance of healthcare insurance coverage (Yagi et al., 2022).

Socioeconomic and Diversity Disparities Significantly Affect The Healthcare Issue

Socioeconomic factors affecting healthcare insurance coverage include unemployment, low-income households, education level, and health literacy (Shami et al., 2019). These factors affect the knowledge of healthcare insurance and the affordability of insurance premiums. Some people are unaware of the availability of favorable insurance coverage premiums, while others cannot afford them due to competing needs. Others overlook or do not understand the significance of health insurance coverage.

Healthcare coverage has a significant impact on immigrants and ethnic minorities. Unlike citizens, undocumented immigrants have no access to insurance coverage, while those without citizenship have limited access to healthcare due to high insurance premiums. According to Baumgartner et al. (2020), undocumented immigrants have a higher death rate than the general population, primarily due to poor healthcare access. In addition, ethnic minorities have poor access to healthcare services primarily due to discrimination, and most of these individuals have low incomes, further decreasing access to healthcare services.

Baumgartner et al. (2020) note that the ACA Medicaid expansion has increased access to insurance coverage, which has improved access to care services for ethnic minorities, as reflected in the narrowing of disparities in care access and care outcomes. Most immigrants do not have enough to afford out-of-pocket fees, something familiar even with the documented migrants. They cannot afford/access premiums, and out-of-pocket payments are costly, making it challenging for them to access healthcare services, which further worsens their healthcare situation. Baugmgather et al. (2020) note that immigrants often avoid healthcare until their health is compromised, increasing care costs, morbidity, and mortality rates.

According to Zhao et al. (2020), poor cancer patient outcomes were associated with patients without health insurance. In addition, the cancer complication rate was also high before the expansion, signifying decreased access to care services. Cancer care has undergone significant improvements since the implementation of the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion.

Changes since the Medicare and Medicaid expansion include increased early cancer diagnosis, improved medication adherence, reduced morbidity rates (such as amputations), increased recovery rates, and lower mortalities (Zhao et al., 2020). Yagi et al. (2020) note that health literacy is an essential determinant of insurance coverage. According to the study, insurance literacy was a significant determinant of health insurance access and healthcare service utilization (Yagi et al., 2022). Thus, improving health insurance knowledge in the community can increase its utilization and enhance the use of healthcare services.

Potential Implementation Plans

Health insurance education programs play a significant role in improving insurance uptake. Many interventions have been implemented, such as the Medicaid Medicare expansion, to increase access to health insurance. Yagi et al. (2022) note that health insurance knowledge is directly related to the utilization of healthcare services. The study notes that low literacy in health insurance is a barrier to accessing primary care, preventive services, and medication adherence.

Educating patients on insurance and its features at the point of care is an effective method of promoting the utilization of care services (Yagi et al., 2022). Yagi et al. (2022) note that the community’s literacy on health insurance is significant in its uptake of insurance coverage. The study results show that community members sometimes report frustrations in choosing the best insurance plans that match their needs and financial position, leading to forgone care. Thus, community education is necessary to increase insurance coverage uptake and ensure quality population health outcomes.

Predicted Outcomes and Opportunities for Growth

The proposed change aims to increase awareness of health insurance and its importance to patient health outcomes. Health education at the community and point-of-care level will help reach a sizable number of community members, thereby improving the intervention’s impact. The predicted outcomes are improved health insurance literacy in the population. Educating patients and the community about the available insurance plans and their significance will improve their decision-making processes and encourage the health-seeking behavior necessary to access/seek health insurance coverage. It will also eliminate indecisiveness and help patients select the most suitable premiums to access all necessary services at affordable rates. Increased access to health insurance will then improve coverage and subsequent patient outcomes.

The healthcare facility has a website that could be significant in population education. The hospital has a limited staff, and the education role will increase the workload; hence, there is a need to devise ways that do not strain the available resources. The website can be a valuable educational source for all patients in the future, supporting the proposed efforts. Patients can access health insurance information from the portal, reinforcing the organization’s efforts to improve literacy and health insurance uptake.

Conclusion

Health insurance coverage is an issue of interest. It significantly affects my work, organizations, colleagues, and communities primarily because private and public insurance are the largest payers of healthcare services. Socioeconomic factors, such as income level and health literacy, affect insurance uptake. Disparities exist in populations such as undocumented immigrants and ethnic minorities due to these groups’ unavailability of good insurance plans. Community and point-of-care education are effective interventions for improving health insurance literacy and coverage. In the future, the organizational website will be vital in promoting these communication efforts.

References

Baumgartner, J., Collins, S., Radley, D., & Hayes, S. (2020). How the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Has Narrowed Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Insurance Coverage and Access to Health Care, 2013‐18. Health Services Research, 55, 56–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13406

Courtemanche, C., Marton, J., Ukert, B., Yelowitz, A., Zapata, D., & Fazlul, I. (2019). The three‐year impact of the Affordable Care Act on disparities in insurance coverage. Health Services Research, 54, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13077

Erlangga, D., Suhrcke, M., Ali, S., & Bloor, K. (2019). The impact of public health insurance on health care utilization, financial protection, and health status in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. PlOS One, 14(8), e0219731. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219731

Geethanath, S., & Vaughan Jr, J. T. (2019). Accessible magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 49(7), e65-e77. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26638

Keisler-Starkey, K., & Bunch, L. N. (2020). Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2019. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2022/demo/p60-278.pdf

Shami, E., Tabrizi, J. S., & Nosratnejad, S. (2019). The effect of health insurance on the utilization of health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Galen Medical Journal, 8, e1411. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v8i0.1411

Yagi, B. F., Luster, J. E., Scherer, A. M., Farron, M. R., Smith, J. E., & Tipirneni, R. (2022). Association of health insurance literacy with health care utilization: a systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06819-0

Zhao, J., Mao, Z., Fedewa, S. A., Nogueira, L., Yabroff, K. R., Jemal, A., & Han, X. (2020). The Affordable Care Act and access to care across the cancer control continuum: A Review at 10 Years. CA: A Cancer Journal For Clinicians, 70(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21604