NFDN 1002 Assignment 2: Teaching Plan

NorQuest College NFDN 1002 Assignment 2: Teaching Plan Example

One of the most crucial aspects of the nursing process is developing a teaching plan. The patient’s active participation in the care process and compliance with instructions are the goals of patient teaching. The paper describes a teaching plan for Mr. Goldblum, a 72-year-old male with an ischemic stroke who has difficulty swallowing, speech and cognition. Patient education is a continuous process until the participants attain their goals, change their goals, or recognize that the goals will not enable them to meet their learning objectives (Anekwe & Rahkovsky, 2018). A stroke is a life-changing event that needs adjustments; therefore, comprehensive teaching is crucial.

Assessment Data and Learning Needs

The teaching plan will cover impaired communication and impaired swallowing. Due to the chronic pattern of stroke, the patient and family need to be trained on the patient’s various deficits, how to improve them, and the need to be patient because the patient may never fully recover to the pre–stoke state (Pierpoint & Pillay, 2020). For example, they are trained on the need for thickened fluids for dysphagia and to protect the airway.

The rationale for this is the request by the patient to take regular fluids despite having difficulty swallowing. Training to improve communication is a crucial need to enhance the achievement of the understanding of the priority need. Alternative communication techniques help to overcome the problem of speech disturbance (Mitchell et al., 2021). The family members later learn to use the tools to enhance communication.

Priority Learning Need and Diagnosis

Improvement in swallowing is the priority patient need. Difficulty swallowing compromises the airway by causing aspiration, which may lead to death. The nursing diagnosis is insufficient knowledge on the management of post-stroke impaired swallowing related to a lack of understanding of the interventions evidenced by the patient’s insistence to take regular foods. The goal is that at the end of the ten sessions, the patient demonstrates feeding methods and decisions that are appropriate to his situation with aspiration prevented. The outcome is the collaboration of the patient with the multidisciplinary care team in making appropriate feeding decisions.

Domains of Learning

The best suitable teaching methods will include psychomotor and cognitive learning. Psychomotor learning will include training the patient and the caregiver on the optimal position that prevents aspiration and methods of improving swallowing. The maneuvers are head turned to the weak side for unilateral pharyngeal paralysis, head back for decreased posterior propulsion of tongue, and lying down on either side for reduced pharyngeal contraction. The patient will be taught how to coordinate the muscles and sensory stimulation techniques to improve swallowing. Cognitive learning will emphasize scheduling of the meals, the preferred food consistency, and other characteristics such as temperature and type.

Barriers to Learning

Communication impairment is a crucial barrier to learning. Difficulty understanding will impede cognitive learning because the patient will not understand the rationale of the feeding decisions we are making for him. Speech difficulty will impair feedback from the patient regarding the teaching and raise any clarifications or concerns. The danger to this is imposing interventions that the patient is uncomfortable with.

Teaching Plan

The training will be done in the patient’s room, in the presence of the caregiver or family. The sessions will be held daily from 8:30 – 9:30 am for one hour for ten days. Later the patient will be referred to an occupational therapist, and early morning is chosen because the patient will not be fatigued. The session will be one hour because the process requires patience. The teaching resources A pen and paper are needed for the patient to write down what he cannot articulate.

The patient and caregiver will be taught about meal scheduling for cognitive learning. The patient should have a minimum of thirty minutes before meals to reduce fatigue and enhance swallowing. The caregiver should be patient with him and avoid distractions during feeding. Alcohol-free moisturizers will be indicated before and after meals to counteract the effects of dry mouth. They will teach appropriate food temperature is either cold or warm to stimulate salivation and that water should be chilled. The level of deficit determines food consistency, and for this patient level, three thickened fluids are indicated for enhanced swallowing. The food shall be placed on the unaffected side of the mouth.

Psychomotor training will include patient positioning, helping the patient with head control, and manual stimulation of the lips to close or open by applying lips or chin pressure. Applying ice on the weak parts of the tongue and stroke the cheek with a tongue blade to improve tongue movement and control. The patient will be scheduled for an exercise program that effectively increases appetite levels by releasing endorphins from the brain.

Evaluation of Learning

Evaluation of the psychomotor domain learning will be by demonstrating appropriate patient positioning and having control. Secondly, the effectiveness of the training will be marked by the caregiver demonstrating appropriate stimulating methods for the lips, tongue, and cheeks (Steigleder et al., 2019).

The patient understanding will mark the effectiveness of cognitive learning, the rationale for the level III feeds, and agreeing to take them. Secondly, the patient and caregiver will be active participants in formulating the treatment plan. During this process, they will demonstrate understanding by strategically scheduling feeding times and types of feeds, choosing appropriate food temperatures, and using the moisturizer. A quiz capturing the teaching areas will gauge their level of understanding.

Analysis of the Teaching process

A patient teaching plan increases patient understanding of a condition and benefits nurses by allowing them to plan their time efficiently. Patient education aids in managing chronic diseases by informing and involving patients in care guides and lifestyle modifications. The patient adopts positive coping mechanisms, and the family is empowered on how to take care of the patient and undertake therapy sessions with them.

A teaching plan helps systematically deliver concepts and skills in a way that does not overload the patient. The nurse does the prior organization of sessions and contents to be covered. Training, especially for chronic patients, ensures the patient’s compliance with the management plan even on discharge. Breaking down information in a manner that the patient understands without distortion or omission challenges using a teaching plan (Steigleder et al., 2019). Secondly, the patient’s state regarding age, culture, cognitive awareness, and attitude affects the patient’s reception of the training.

Conclusion

Teaching planning is an integral part of a nurse’s patient diagnosis. The plan is tailored- based on patient presentation. The teaching plan addresses post-stroke impaired swallowing training incorporating psychomotor and cognitive domain learning. The setting and contents are pre-determined to provide a sense of direction for the nurse. Patient cognitive impairment is the primary barrier to goal achievement. Patient education empowers them and the caregivers to participate actively in the care process.

References

Anekwe, T. D., & Rahkovsky, I. (2018). Self-management: a comprehensive approach to the management of chronic conditions. American Journal of Public Health, 108(S6), S430-S436. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302041r

Mitchell, C., Gittins, M., Tyson, S., Vail, A., Conroy, P., Paley, L., & Bowen, A. (2021). Prevalence of aphasia and dysarthria among inpatient stroke survivors: describing the population, therapy provision and outcomes on discharge. Aphasiology, 35(7), 950-960. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1759772

Pierpoint, M., & Pillay, M. (2020). Post-stroke dysphagia: An exploration of initial identification and management performed by nurses and doctors. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 67(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v67i1.625

Steigleder, T., Kollmar, R., & Ostgathe, C. (2019). Palliative care for stroke patients and their families: barriers for implementation. Frontiers in Neurology, 10, 164. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00164

NFDN 1002 Assignment 2: Teaching Plan Instructions

Scenario – Mr. Goldblum

Mr. Goldblum is 72 years old and lives in a continuing care facility. He has had a recent ischemic stroke and has right-sided weakness. He was also diagnosed with difficulty swallowing. He has a history of hypertension, treated with Ramipril 10 mg daily. He has recently been started on Coumadin due to the stroke, and has an INR performed weekly. He is on Level 3 thickened fluids. He does not like the thickened fluids and has been asking for regular fluids. His speech was affected by the stroke and at times he is difficult to understand.

Introduction

Clearly identified who the client is. Provided a clear succinct outline of the teaching plan. A brief summary of what was learned from the experience is clearly provided.

3points

 

Limited information provided on the client. Outline of the teaching plan is incomplete and a summary of what was learned from the experience is unclear and/or one of the components listed is missing.

2points

Is missing two of the following: Identified the client. Provided an outline of the teaching plan and a brief summary of what was learned from the experience

1points

No introduction was provided.

0points

Assessment Data & Learning Needs

2 accurate & appropriate learning needs identified and supported by assessment data (rationale) that is comprehensive and concise based on the case study.
3points
2 basic learning needs identified and supported by assessment data (rationale) that is satisfactory and based on the case study.
2points
Identifies only 1 learning need OR learning needs identified are inaccurate or inappropriate and/or assessment data (rationale) is non-specific or incomplete based on the case study.
1points
Learning needs and assessment data (rationale) are inadequate, irrelevant or absent.
0points
Priority Learning Need & Diagnosis
Identifies priority learning need. Writes an appropriate nursing diagnosis that includes all components of a nursing diagnosis.
2points
Priority learning need is inaccurate or inappropriate. Includes nursing diagnosis but is missing components.
1points
Does not identify priority learning need and/or nursing diagnosis.
0points
Goal
Goal is relevant, appropriate and based on the priority health need.
2points
Goal is satisfactory, basic and based on the priority health need.
1points
Goal is inadequate, irrelevant or absent.
0points
Expected Outcome (SMART Criteria)
Expected outcome is relevant, appropriate, based on the learning needs and is related to the nursing diagnosis and contains all elements of SMART criteria
2points
Expected outcome is inaccurate or inappropriate, and is not related to the learning need and/or nursing diagnosis and/or is incomplete re: SMART criteria.
1points
Expected outcome is irrelevant or absent.
0points
Learning Domain
Information identified is accurate, prioritized and appropriate for the case study. Includes literature reference.
3points
Information identified is satisfactory, prioritized and/or somewhat appropriate for the case study. Includes reference.
2points
Information identified is off topic, and/or inappropriately prioritized for the case study. May or may not include reference.
1points
Information is inadequate, irrelevant or absent.
0points
Barriers to Learning
Chosen barriers are accurate and relevant for the section. Rationale is comprehensive and concise.
3points
Chosen barriers are somewhat accurate and relevant for the scenario. Rationale is satisfactory and basic.
2points
Chosen barriers are non-specific or off topic. Rationale is limited or absent.
1points
Chosen barriers are inappropriate, inadequate or absent.
0points
Teaching Plan: Educational Content
Comprehensive, concise and relevant information is provided for the section. Education content is appropriate and meaningful to the case study. Literature support provided.
3points
Satisfactory and basic information is provided for the section. Education content is somewhat appropriate and/or relevant to the case study. Adequate literature support provided.
2points
Information is minimal and/or limited for the section. Educational content is off topic or not always appropriate to the case study. Minimal literature support.
1points
Information is inadequate, irrelevant or absent. No literature support.
0points
Teaching Plan: Teaching Methods
Teaching methods are appropriate and relevant for the teaching plan. Literature support provided.
3points
Teaching methods are satisfactory and appropriate for the teaching plan. Adequate literature support provided.
2points
Teaching methods are non-specific or incomplete and are off-topic or not appropriate. Minimal literature support.
1points
Teaching methods are inappropriate, off-topic or absent. No literature support.
0points
Teaching Plan: Teaching Resources
Resources are appropriate, insightful and relevant to the teaching plan. Literature support provided.
3points
Resources are basic and satisfactory, and/or somewhat relevant to the teaching plan. Adequate literature support provided.
2points
Resources are minimal, limited and/or may not be relevant to the teaching plan. Minimal literature support.
1points
Resources are inadequate, irrelevant or absent. No literature support.
0points
Evaluation of Learning
Criteria is comprehensive, accurate and relevant for the section.
3points
Criteria is basic, satisfactory and appropriate for the section.
2points
Criteria is non-specific or incomplete. Evidence is off-topic, limited or not appropriate.
1points
Criteria is inappropriate, inadequate or absent.
0points
Reflection of the Teaching Process
Comprehensive, concise and relevant arguments are provided to highlight the importance of teaching plans.
3points
Satisfactory and basic arguments are provided to highlight the importance of teaching plans.
2points
Non-specific or incomplete arguments are provided related to the importance of teaching plans.
1points
Content is inappropriate, inadequate or absent.
0points
Reflection: Strengths and weaknesses of using the teaching plan.
Comprehensive, concise and relevant information is provided. Content is clear, appropriate and meaningful.
3points
Satisfactory, basic and appropriate information is provided. Content presented is somewhat clear and/or missing strengths or weaknesses
2points
Information presented is minimal. Content may be off topic and/or not appropriate.
1points
Information is inadequate, irrelevant or absent.
0points
Reflection: Benefits of using a teaching plan in future practice.
Comprehensive, concise and relevant information is provided. Content provided is clear, appropriate
3points
Satisfactory, basic and appropriate information is provided. Benefits presented are vague.
2points
Benefit information presented is minimal. Content may be off topic and/or not appropriate
1points
Information is inadequate, irrelevant or absent.
0points
Conclusion
Presents a logical, clear, concise summary of main points; presents clear recommendations on changes to be made next time teaching this topic
3points
Provides a conclusion but does not summarize main points and/or recommendations on changes to be made next time teaching this topic.
2points
Does not adequately explain findings or recommendations on changes to be made next time teaching this topic
1points
Conclusion not provided
0points
Grammar/Sentence Structure
Free from writing convention errors
1points
Many/Significant writing convention errors
0points
APA Formatting
Free from APA formatting errors
1points
Many/significant APA errors
0points

NFDN_1002_Teaching_Plan_Assignment.docx.pdf

NFDN_1002_Teaching_Plan_Rubric_2020.pdf

NFDN_1002_TEMPLATE_ASSIGNMENT_2_TEACHING_PLAN_(4)