Week 5 iCARE Paper Grading Rubric

Week 5 iCARE Paper Grading Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Introduction

The type of work setting and interprofessional team features are described (improvement or type of team).

25 pts

Introduction thoroughly describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team.

22 pts

Introduction describes the work setting and features of the interprofessional team.

20 pts

One element from the first column is missing or lacks detail.

10 pts

Two elements from the first column are missing and lack detail.

0 pts

The introduction is missing.
25 pts

Compassion

Nursing action related to compassion is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

25 pts

The nursing action related to compassion was clearly identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.

22 pts

The nursing action related to compassion was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

20 pts

The nursing action related to compassion was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.

10 pts

The nursing action related to compassion lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.

0 pts

No Marks
25 pts

Advocacy

Nursing action related to advocacy is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

25 pts

The nursing action related to advocacy was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.

22 pts

The nursing action related to advocacy was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

20 pts

The nursing related to advocacy was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.

10 pts

The nursing action related to advocacy lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.

0 pts

The nursing action and support elements were missing.
25 pts

Resilience

Nursing action related to resilience is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

25 pts

The nursing action related to resilience was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.

22 pts

The nursing action related to resilience was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

20 pts

The nursing action related to resilience was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.

10 pts

The nursing action related to resiliency lacked more than two elements of support or lacked detail.

0 pts

The nursing action and support elements were missing.
25 pts

Nursing action related to EBP is described in support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

25 pts

The nursing action related to EBP was identified and support of the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes were thoroughly explained.

22 pts

The nursing action related to EBP was identified and satisfactorily supported the interprofessional team, the culture of the unit, and patient outcomes.

20 pts

The nursing action related to EBP was identified and one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.

10 pts

The nursing action related to EBP was not sufficiently identified or one of the elements of support from the first column were missing or lacked detail.

0 pts

The nursing action and support elements were missing.
25 pts

Summary

Explain how nursing actions of the iCARE components can support interprofessional teams and patient outcomes. Address how you can influence support for interprofessional teams on your unit or area of practice.

35 pts

Key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are thoroughly described.

31 pts

Most key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described.

28 pts

Some key points regarding nursing actions and support for interprofessional teams and patient outcomes; and, nursing supportive influence are described

13 pts

Summary lacks details of key points.

0 pts

Summary is missing.
35 pts

Mechanics and Organization

The discussion is well organized and logical. The structure is clear and compelling to the reader. Paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas stand out

20 pts

Excellent mechanics and organization with minimal errors of the following: Well organized and logical, correct grammar, punctuation, and spelling, professional wording is used, uses complete sentences, paragraphs are linked together logically, and main ideas expressed clearly.

18 pts

Good mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Few errors noted.

16 pts

Fair mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Some errors noted.

8 pts

Poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A. Many errors noted.

0 pts

Very poor mechanics and organization considering the elements listed in the column A such that it is difficult to follow or understand.
20 pts

APA

APA format is used throughout.

20 pts

Excellent APA formatting with minimal errors of the following: All sources cited in the text -all references listed on the reference page using basics of APA format -title page in general APA format -headings present and follow APA format -12-point font, double spaced, 1 inch margins, paragraphs indented -used only one short quote and body of the paper is approximately 3 pages

18 pts

Good formatting considering the elements listed in column A.

16 pts

Fair formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Some APA errors noted.

8 pts

Poor formatting considering the elements listed in column A. Many APA errors noted.

0 pts

Very poor formatting such that paper is difficult to read. Numerous APA errors noted.
20 pts

Use of CINAHL article as Required Source from CCN Library

0 pts

0 points deducted
Used CINAHL article from CCN Library

0 pts

20 points (10%) deducted
Required article source of CINAHL not used resulting in point deduction
0 pts

Late Deduction

0 pts

0 points deducted
Submitted on time

0 pts

Not submitted on time – Points deducted
1 day late = 10 deduction; 2 days late = 20 deduction; 3 days late = 30 deduction; 4 days late = 40 deduction; 5 days late = 50 deduction; 6 days late = 60 deduction; 7 days late = 70 deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late
0 pts
Total Points: 200