HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models. It is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

Instructions for HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

Compare two different change management theories or change models.  Use peer-reviewed research articles to describe these concepts and provide examples of applications of these theories or models to practice. Have a look at HQS 630 Topic 1 Assignment: The Need for Change

Sample 1 Approach to HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

According to Cummins & Worley (2014), change management addresses the effective implementation of planned change by focusing on values of cost, quality, and schedule. There are many change models that can be applied in health care. Research by Harrison et al. (2021) offered that the most commonly applied methodologies are Kotter’s and Lewin’s models.

Kotter’s 8 steps for leading change include creating a sense of urgency, building a guiding coalition, forming a strategic vision, enlisting a volunteer army, enabling action by removing barriers, generating short-term wins, sustaining acceleration, and instituting change (Kotter International Inc., 2014). An example given by Harrison et al. (2021), is a reduction in SSI’s that focused on change projects in a breast surgery team with each step operationalized demonstrating reduced SSI’s from 7% to 3.1% of inpatients.

Lewin’s model of change underlying principle is that driving forces must outweigh resisting forces if the change is to happen and suggests that change has three steps, unfreezing the current state, moving to a new state through participation and involvement, and lastly refreezing and stabilizing the new state (Cameron & Green, 2015). Using Lewin’s model a trauma program to decrease nonsurgical trauma admission rate and better align resources to provide care for injured children at a pediatric trauma center (El-Shafy et al. 2019). In this study, the nonsurgical admission rate decreased to less than 5%, with 39 out of 781 admitted to nonsurgical services.

Both of these compared models demonstrate the ability to implement and sustain change. Change in health care is necessary to ensure appropriate quality of care for patients.

References:

Cameron, E., & Green, M. (2015). Making sense of change management: A complete guide to the models, tools and techniques of organizational change, 4th ed. Books24x7. https://library.books24x7.com.lopes.idm.oclc.og.

Cummings, T. & Worley, C. (2014). Organization development & change (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

El-Shafy, I. A., Zapke, J., Sargeant, D., Prince, J. M., & Christopherson, N. A. M. (2019). Decreased pediatric trauma length of stay and improved disposition with implementation of Lewin’s change model. Journal of Trauma Nursing, 26(2), 84-88. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1097/JTN.00000000000426.

Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where do models for change management, improvement and implementation meet? A systematic review of the applications of change management models in healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13, 85-108. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176.

Kotter International Inc. (2014). 8 steps to accelerate change in your organization. https://kotterine.com/8-steps-e-book.

Sample 2 Approach to HQS 630 Topic 1 DQ 2 Compare two different change management theories or change models

Change is the main constant in the world we live in, without change there would be no progress. Change is necessary for improvement and an organization that plans change ahead will improve more accurately its operating ways. There are three models of planned change, and these are the Lewin’s change model, the action research model, and the positive model. For this discussion, I will focus on the Lewin model and the action research model.

Lewin suggests that efforts to bring about planned change in an organization should approach change as a multistage process. This model of planned change is made up of three steps: Unfreezing, Moving, & Refreezing (Cummings & Worley, 2014, p. 64). Lewin’s 3-step planned approach to change is relevant to understanding how organizations both shape and grow in response to new behaviors of individuals who inhabit those organizations (Manchester, et al., 2014). This model is focused on how well an organization is ready for change. 

“The classic action research model focuses on planned change as a cyclical process in which initial research about the organization provides information to guide subsequent action” (Manchester, et al., 2014, p. 65). After this the results are analyzed, to provide additional information to guide further action, and so on.

The action research model is aimed at implementing planned change, as well as to provide further knowledge for more applications to various settings. It places heavy emphasis on data gathering and diagnosis prior to action planning and implementation, as well as careful evaluation of results after the action is taken. Lewin’s Planned Change Model introduces change once the members are prepared for it. It is the same case for the action research model.

An example of the use for Lewin’s planned change model is presented by Wojciechowski et. al. (2016) where this model is utilized to develop and use a crosswalk to educate nurses on the Lean philosophy and tools adopted by this organization for CQI also familiarized non-nursing members of the interprofessional team and the common nursing culture and language for change. The action research model for change has been use as an effective method to promote change in primary care practices by creating a feedback process that enables comparison with other practices and motivating change through interventions (Hampshire, Blair, Crown, Avery, & Williams, 1999).

References

Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2014). Organization Development & Change 10th Ed. Stamford, CT © Cengage: Cengage Learning.

Hampshire, A., Blair, M., Crown, N., Avery, A., & Williams, I. (1999). Action research: a useful method of promoting change in primary care? Family Practice, 16 (3) 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/16.3.305.

Manchester, J., Gray-Miceli, D., Metcalf, J. A., Paolini, C. A., Napier, A. H., Coogle, C. L., & Owens, M. G. (2014). Facilitating Lewin’s change model with collaborative evaluation in promoting evidence-based practices of health professionals. Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol 47, p. 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.08.007.

Wojciechowski, E., Murphy, P., Pearsall, T., French, E. (2016) A Case Review: Integrating Lewin’s Theory with Lean’s System Approach for Change. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Vol. 21 No. 2, Manuscript 4. https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol21No02Man04