HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch. – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch. It is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

Instructions for HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch. Use a personal example or find a current example in the news to illustrate your point. Discuss which evidence-based practices are used when evaluating errors and good catches. Check HQS 610 Topic 6 Benchmark – Technology and Medical Errors Here.

Example 1 Approach to HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

Healthcare institutions should be able to detect patient care process faults promptly and rectify them. Patient safety and systemic quality improvement depend on early fault detection and mitigation (Fondahn et al., 2016). Medical technology advancement can be used through automation to detect errors, analyze them, correct them, and render the system efficient for maximum positive health outcomes and patient experience (Harrington, 2019). However, detecting and mitigating the effects of medical errors cannot be analyzed without proper incident report mechanisms in healthcare facilities (Abreu, 2021). This discussion will evaluate the difference between a medical error and a good catch and which evidence-based practices are used when evaluating errors and good catches.

A medical error refers to preventable procedural actions that put patients at risk of harm or an unintended outcome. Medical errors are likely to occur when there is a deviation from the standard of care. It could be medication errors, equipment failures, wrong diagnoses, and incorrect patient documentation. On the contrary, a good catch refers to a medical situation where a medical error has been identified and prevented before it occurs to affect patients (Barnes et al., 2020). A good catch leads to a prompt intervention, mitigating the potential harm medical errors could have caused the patient. Universally, medical professionals agree that implementing evidence-based practice research on medical errors increases the chances of a good catch (Misasi & Keebler, 2019).

A vivid medication error case occurred at a clinic in my neighborhood, where I had accompanied my friend to take their 8-year-old child for a checkup. The nurse had prescribed codeine for the cough remedy. From my professional studies, I knew codeine is contraindicated for children under 12 years, and thus, I raised the issue with the doctor in charge of the facility. The doctor admitted it as a medical error and gave a correct prescription for the cough. Even though effective as a cough remedy for individuals over 12 years, codeine can cause life-threatening breathing system failures in children. This intervention was a good catch because the medical error was detected promptly, and a mitigation strategy was implemented.

Evidence-based practices (EBP) effectively evaluate medical errors and good catches (Veazie et al., 2019). These EBP practices include clinical expertise, best-practice care, incident reporting, and analysis. Medical error evaluation practice methods include root cause analysis, human factor analysis, classification system, Lean Six Sigma, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), and Continuous Quality Improvement. These EBPs provide frameworks to detect underlying causes of medical errors and enable healthcare professionals to craft strategies that ensure patient safety and maximum health outcomes. According to Lee et al. (2019), when implemented correctly, medical error and good catch EBPs create a patient safety culture.

Patient safety and positive health outcomes rely on early medical error detection and a prompt good catch. Healthcare is a complex risk agglomeration field that seeks to improve society’s quality of life; therefore, medical errors must be identified and dealt with appropriately to ensure positive health outcomes. Medical error analysis methods must be carefully chosen according to the type of error and when it occurred. A good catch should be an opportunity to improve medical systems and their response-ability to detect and mitigate future medical errors. Evidence-based practices should provide the frameworks to evaluate errors and good catches.

References

Abreu, T. (2021). Adverse event reporting and root cause analysis: Increasing nurses’ understanding can reduce errors. American Nurse Journal, 16(6), 44+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A691920602/AONE?u=anon~ab30655e&sid=googleScholar&xid=462932fb

Barnes, Naves, & Ju (2020). Implementation and Benefits of a Good Catch Program. Radiation Therapist. https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http

Fondahn, E., De Fer, T. M., Lane, M., & Vannucci, A. (2016). Washington Manual of patient safety and quality improvement. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Harrington, L. (2019). Use errors with health care technologies: an inconvenient truth. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 30(1), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2019884

Kurapati, S., Boyd, C. J., King, T. W., & Awad, S. S. (2020). Studying institutional situational awareness through anonymous incident reporting. Quality Management in Healthcare, 29(3), 164-168. https://doi.org/10.1097/QMH.0000000000000257

Lee, S. E., Scott, L. D., Dahinten, V. S., Vincent, C., Lopez, K. D., & Park, C. G. (2019). Safety culture, patient safety, and quality of care outcomes: a literature review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(2), 279-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945917747416

Misasi, P., & Keebler, J. R. (2019). Medication safety in emergency medical services: approaching an evidence-based method of verification to reduce errors. Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety, 10, 2042098618821916. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042098618821916

Veazie, S., Peterson, K., & Bourne, D. (2019). Evidence brief: implementation of high-reliability organization principles.

Example 2 Approach to HQS 610 Topic 6 DQ 2 Describe the difference between a medical error and a good catch.

Medical error is a mistake made in medicine. A good catch happens when an event that has a potential to lead to patient harm is averted because someone spotted it. A good catch could also be a discovery or an innovation made by front line workers that leads to a practice improvement.

For example, one strategy to prevent patient falls is to visually monitor patients remotely using a camera. An error in the process could happen if all cameras are full, but a patient suddenly needs this service. If no camera spaces are available, the nurse has to ask the monitor tech to inquire with each nurse assigned to the patients that are currently being viewed to see if one of them may not require the service anymore.

This is an error of inefficiency. On the other hand, if the monitor tech starts making the same inquiry periodically and routinely, many spots may become open and available. Not only can the tech provide the service in an emergent situation, but also because the total number of patients monitored may be reduced, the tech’s fatigue will be reduced, since only patients who actively require monitoring will be watched. Visualizing this opportunity is considered a good catch.

The EBP practice used when evaluating errors and good catches are open-mindedness, because one has to be open to what is atypical. It is mindfulness, because one has to consider many options, risks, benefits, and alternatives. It is also reflection because one has to evaluate the ingenuity of ideas that can change our reality.

The old way of dealing with medical errors was blame and punishment, which resulted in underreporting of errors (Adams, as cited in Barnes et al., 2020). Both errors and good catches can be beneficial, because they allow an opportunity to learn, which, in turn, arbitrates change and improvement. Transformational leadership values error disclosure in building a safety culture whose growth potential is theoretically and practically unlimited, since error is a part of our nature.

Reference:

Barnes, T., Naves, J., & Ju, A. (2020). Implementation and Benefits of a Good Catch Program. Radiation Therapist, 29(2), 182–185.