HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers. – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers. It is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

Instructions for HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers. Describe one strength and one limitation of each. Have a look at HQS 610 Topic 5 Assignment: Just Culture And Culture Of Safety.

Example 1 Approach HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 1 Evaluate three different tools developed to manage patient safety issues and educate health care providers.

Patient safety is a healthcare discipline that arose due to the complex risks involved in care delivery, with results that can be at the extremes of fatality and permanent disability in patients within a small error margin (Fondahn et al., 2016). Specific patient safety tools were developed to manage patient safety issues, educate healthcare providers, mitigate these risks, and maximize patient safety (Han et al., 2020). Patient safety tools aim to eliminate avoidable health and procedural complications, ensuring better patient outcomes. This discussion will focus on patient safety tools, their strengths, and limitations.

SBAR is a patient safety tool abbreviated from Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation for structured critical care communication between professionals concerning critical patients. SBAR is efficient in conveying direct communication across various disciplines and workforce ranks (Coolen et al., 2020). It enables healthcare professionals to assess and recommend treatments to critical care patients in formal and disciplined healthcare communications.

It creates a shared mental model with and around patients. SBAR provides a framework for detailed, relevant communication between nurses about the healthcare needs of a patient. The SBAR communication tool is convenient and easy to use in different clinical settings because it uses the patient as the primary source of assessment. However, the drawback is that it requires educational training to sustain clinical usage and results.

The action Hierarchy tool aims to determine how and why medical errors occur. It establishes the actions that have the strongest effect on a process for a fruitful system improvement (Presseau et al., 2019) for preventive action purposes. This tool focuses on preventing future harm. As a part of root cause analysis, action hierarchy enables healthcare professionals to manage quality and safety throughout the patient care process. The strength of the action hierarchy is in identifying recommendations to optimize healthcare. However, action hierarchy is limited by poor risk controls as it only focuses on recommendations thought to work ( MacGillivray, 2020), lowering the quality improvement proponents.

The Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) tool is systemically designed to detect system failures before they occur, identifying the areas needing change. FMEA is widely accepted as a Six Sigma tool as it structurally captures the collective capacity of the healthcare team and documents and tracks risk to eliminate failures (Ouyang et al., 2020). Improvements can be developed to minimize the failures at this stage, ensuring better patient outcomes. The greatest strength of FMEA lies in its ability to verify and validate changes, as it has multiple options to mitigate risks. However, the FMEA tool disregards the relationships between different system failures. Systemic failures are always related; thus, FMEA must be used with other patient safety tools for improved healthcare systems and optimum patient care.

Healthcare delivery and the patient care process carry a complex probability of risks, some fatal. Therefore, patient safety must be a priority because medication and operations allow a small error margin beyond which health crises can result. As such, patient safety tools have to be developed to detect and mitigate health risks before they occur. In many instances, more than one tool should be employed to increase the chances of detecting and managing errors to improve outcomes. Patient safety tools have strengths and weaknesses at varying capacities, which could provide opportunities for systemic quality improvement after proper analysis and mitigation interventions are derived.

References

Coolen, E., Engbers, R., Draaisma, J., Heinen, M., & Fluit, C. (2020). The use of SBAR as a structured communication tool in the pediatric non-acute care setting: bridge or barrier for interprofessional collaboration? Journal of interprofessional care, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1816936

Fondahn, E., De Fer, T. M., Lane, M., & Vannucci, A. (2016). Washington Manual of patient safety and quality improvement. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Han, Y., Kim, J. S., & Seo, Y. (2020). Cross-sectional study on patient safety culture, patient safety competency, and adverse events. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 42(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919838990

MacGillivray, T. E. (2020). Advancing the Culture of Patient Safety and Quality Improvement. Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 16(3), 192. https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcj-16-3-192

Ouyang, L., Zheng, W., Zhu, Y., & Zhou, X. (2020). An interval probability‐based FMEA model for risk assessment: A real‐world case. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 36(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.2563

Presseau, J., McCleary, N., Lorencatto, F., Patey, A. M., Grimshaw, J. M., & Francis, J. J. (2019). Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behavior. Implementation Science, 14, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x

HQS 610 Topic 5 DQ 2

Using personal experience or research, describe best practices that are in place that promote patient, community, and provider safety in the practice setting. In doing so, be sure to include methods to identify and prevent verbal, physical, and psychological harm to patients and staff.