Comparing Health Outcome in Adjoining Counties
Comparing Health Outcome in Adjoining Counties
Comparing Health Outcome in Adjoining Counties
This assignment consists of four paragraphs in length, word document and double spacing. 12 point new roman front. If you have any questions, please let me know
HCM -320 1-2 Journal:Guidelines and Rubric Overview : In this journal, you will have the opportunity to consider the healthcare economics of two adjacent counties in the Kansas Ci ty metropolitan area. Read Case 2.1 in Chapter 2 of your textbook.
In your journal assignment, answer the following case study questions:
What are the main inputs to health mentioned in this case? Are there important inputs to health that the case does not mention?
What health behaviors should get priority?
Does income play a role in improving health?
How important is health insurance in improving health?
Wyandotte County has relatively few primary care physicians. Should the number of primary care physicians be a priority?
What role, if any, should the federal government play in improving health?
How do you think your answers would differ if you were a resident of Wyandotte County? Support your responses with examples from the case or references to your textbook.
Use the journal as an opportunity to familiarize yourself with the final project requirements and case study. Journal activities in this course are private between you and your instructor. Only the instructor can view and comment on your assignments. Rub ric
ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Guidelines for Submission: Your journal assignment should be 2 to 4 paragraphs in length. Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12 – point Times New Roman font, and one -inch margins.
Critical Elements Proficient (100%) Needs Improvement (75%) Not Evident (0%) Value Inputs Discusses the main health inputs mentioned in this case, identifies important inputs not mentioned and supports stance with examples from the case or references to the textbook Discusses the main health inpu ts mentioned in this case, identifies important inputs not mentioned but does not support stance.
Does not discuss the main health inputs mentioned in this case 14 Health Behavior Discusses what health behaviors should get priority and supports stance with examples from the case or references to the textbook Discusses what health behaviors should get priority, but does not support stance.
Does not discuss what health behaviors should get priority 14 Income Level Describes how income plays a role in improving health and supports description with examples from the case or references to the textbook Describes how income plays a role in improving health but does not support description.
Does not describe how income plays a role in improving health 14 Health Insurance Describes the importance of health insurance in improving health and supports description with examples from the case or references to the textbook Describes the importance of health insurance in improving health, but does not support description.
Does not describe the importance of health insurance in improving health 14 Primary Care Providers Discusses the quantity of primary care physicians and determines whether or not this quantity should be a priority and supports response with examples from the case or references to the textbook Discusses the quantity of primary care physicians and determines whether or not this quantity should be a priority, but does not support response with examples from the case or references to the textbook.
Does not discuss the quantity of primary care physicians 14 Government Role Defines the role of the federal government plays in improving health and supports description with examples from the case or references to the textbook Defines the role of the federal government plays in improving health, but does not explain why or why.
Does not define the role of the federal government plays in improving health 15 Resident Perspective Discusses whether healthcare economics issues would be different from the perspective of a Wyandotte County resident, and explains why or why not.
Discusses whether healthcare economics issues would be different from the perspective of a Wyandotte County resident, and explains why or why not, but does not explain why or why not Does not discuss whether healthcare economics issues would be different from the perspective of a Wyandotte County resident 15 Total 100%
