NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of the discussion this week is to analyze a translation science model as the foundation for translation science. Have a look at NR702 Week 6 Discussion | Methodology: Formative Evaluation.

Instructions

Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less:

  1. State your practice question in PICOT format.
  2. Analyze the process of research translation into practice through a summary of the translational science or theoretical model you chose to support your project implementation. Include the main phases or constructs of the model in your analysis.
  3. Add at least four activities that will occur during the project implementation under the appropriate step(s) or phase(s) within your chosen theoretical framework to demonstrate how this theory will provide the framework for your practice change project.

Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

  1. Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
  2. Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
  3. Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
  4. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
  5. Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
  6. Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
  7. Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
  8. Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
  2. Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)

NR702 Week 5 Discussion | Methodology of Research Translation Example

PICOT:

For patients who underwent laminectomies, spinal decompression, discectomies, and spinal fusions at an academic medical center, what is the impact of implementing an early mobility protocol on post-operative neurosurgical spine patients, compared to the current practice of decreasing the length of stay in 8-10 weeks?

TRANSLATIONAL MODEL

The evidence-based project I have chosen, which focuses on early ambulation and reducing the length of stay for post-operative spine patients, has significant practical implications. As discussed in our previous courses, using translational models or change frameworks is essential for successfully executing this scholarly project. I’ve decided on the knowledge-to-action (KTA) framework in this context. This systematic framework involves identifying and validating existing knowledge, adapting it to current practice, and making it a suitable choice for our evidence-based intervention (Torres et al., 2023).

The KTA framework has six stages that can be effectively discussed during implementation. The first stage is identifying the problem and the practice gap. As discussed, the length of stay of our post-operative spine patients has increased, impacting their outcomes and utilization of hospital resources. The second stage determines whether it can be applied to the current practicum site, following a shared decision among our stakeholders.

The third stage identifies the barriers and challenges that may be encountered during the implementation process. This also means plans to mitigate and overcome these barriers. The fourth stage is implementing the evidence-based intervention at the practicum site. Phases five and six are the conclusion and analysis of the intervention. Phase seven involves sustaining the project by embedding it into the practice and culture of the practicum site. Involving stakeholders throughout the project process ensures a sense of ownership and leadership among them (Ten Ham-Baloyi, 2022).

Activities:

I have discussed the framework above, but how will we incorporate it in the coming weeks?

Week 1: This includes phases 1 and 2, which identify the problem and involve meetings with stakeholders to assess the importance and necessity of the practice change.

Week 2 – 9:  Phases 3 and 4 include identifying the challenges and barriers that the project may face. This also means involving stakeholders and identifying champions to ensure the dissemination of practice change.

Week 9: Phases 5 and 6 ensure the analysis and conclusion of the project. This also includes presenting data to stakeholders and unit champions.

Week 10: In phase 7, we sustain and embed the knowledge into the culture and practice.

Reference

Torres, C. P., Mendes, F. J., & Barbieri-Figueiredo, M. (2023). Use of “The Knowledge-to-Action Framework” for the implementation of evidence-based nursing in child and family care: Study protocol. PLOS ONE, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283656.

Ten Ham-Baloyi W. (2022). Assisting nurses with evidence-based practice: A case for the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 27, 2118. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v27i0.2118