NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to analyze the evidence-based intervention chosen for your DNP practice change project. The evidence-based intervention must be supported by research articles demonstrating that the intervention is effective in changing the outcome for your project. This research is the foundation for choosing the evidence-based intervention, along with other factors that might support the intervention at the practicum site. Have a look at NR702 Week 4 Assignment 1 DNP Project Manuscript Part 2: Literature Synthesis and Evidence-Based Intervention.

Instructions

Review this week’s readings and provide your response in 150 words or less:

  1. State your practice question in PICOT format.
  2. Create your rationale for choosing your evidence-based intervention.
  3. List the high-level steps or activities in your evidence-based intervention implementation plan.

Use Grammarly and current APA format for the posts. Do not repeat the prompts in the post. Provide respectful and thought-provoking feedback to your student colleagues. Ask for clarification and elaboration if needed.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

  1. Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
  2. Applies organizational and system leadership skills to affect systemic changes in corporate culture and to promote continuous improvement in clinical outcomes. (PO 6)
  3. Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
  4. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve health care. (POs 6, 7)
  5. Analyzes health care policies to advocate for equitable health care and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
  6. Creates a supportive organizational culture for flourishing collaborative teams to facilitate clinical disease prevention and promote population health at all system levels. (PO 8)
  7. Translates a synthesis of research and population data to support preventative care and improve the nation’s health. (PO 1)
  8. Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Synthesize scientific knowledge, theory, and practice expertise to inform evidence-based practice and impact outcomes. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9)
  2. Design an evidence-based translational science project to address a practice problem. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
  3. Apply effective strategies in project design for managing practice problems in healthcare delivery at the micro, meso, and macro-system levels. (PCs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8; POs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)

NR702 Week 4 Discussion | Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale Example

Evidence-Based Intervention: Rationale Discussion

Practice Question

The following practice question will serve as the basis for the DNP project: For adult psychiatric patients, does the implementation of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program, compared to current practice, impact anxiety levels in 8-10 weeks?

Rationale for Choosing the Evidence-Based Intervention

The evidence-based intervention selected is the utilization of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. This choice is backed by a thorough examination of research findings, which consistently show the efficacy of MBSR in reducing anxiety symptoms among individuals with psychiatric conditions. The chosen approach aligns with principles that emphasize holistic care and patient-centeredness, providing an all-encompassing method that empowers individuals to address their anxiety symptoms actively.

In addition to addressing the psychological component of anxiety, MBSR offers valuable strategies to improve emotional well-being. The literature review (Liu et al., 2021; Goldberg et al., 2020; Maddock & Blair, 2023; Yang et al., 2021) suggests that this intervention may help mitigate medication reliance, a crucial factor in mental health treatment. Additionally, the chosen intervention aligns with the current emphasis on patient-centered, holistic methods that prioritize the empowerment and well-being of patients.

High-Level Steps in the Evidence-Based Intervention Implementation Plan
  1. Initiate the Program – Introduce the MBSR program to the psychiatric team, explaining the aim and methodology. Train the nursing staff and inform potential participants about the study.
  2. Implementation (Weeks 2-9) – Conduct weekly sessions led by trained MBSR nursing staff, including guided meditation practices, gentle yoga, and group discussions. Provide supporting materials for daily home practice.
  3. Project Wrap-Up (Week 10) – Review the intervention, gather post-intervention data, and encourage participant feedback to assess the program’s effectiveness.
  4. Data Analysis and Interpretation – Organize and analyze data systematically, preparing it for interpretation.

The chosen intervention offers a comprehensive method to address anxiety in psychiatric patients, backed by solid evidence and a clear implementation plan.

References

Goldberg, S. B., Riordan, K. M., Sun, S., Kearney, D. J., & Simpson, T. L. (2020). Efficacy and acceptability of mindfulness-based interventions for military veterans: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 138(110232), 110232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110232

Liu, X., Yi, P., Ma, L., Liu, W., Deng, W., Yang, X., Liang, M., Luo, J., Li, N., & Li, X. (2021). Mindfulness-based interventions for social anxiety disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 300(113935), 113935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113935

Maddock, A., & Blair, C. (2023). How do mindfulness-based programmes improve anxiety, depression and psychological distress? A systematic review. Current Psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 42(12), 10200–10222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02082-y

Yang, X., Fang, Y., Chen, H., Zhang, T., Yin, X., Man, J., Yang, L., & Lu, M. (2021). Global, regional, and national burden of anxiety disorders from 1990 to 2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 30(36). https://doi.org/10.1017/s204579602100027