NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation Instructions

Purpose

Project planning will be an important aspect of your role as a DNP-prepared nurse. The purpose of this assignment is to explore the project management process further as you prepare for your DNP project. This assignment extends the Week 2 and Week 4 assignments and any previous work you completed on your selected practice problem or for your DNP project planning. Have a look at NR711 Week 7 Discussion | Reimbursement Issues.

Instructions

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of this assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

  1. Revise your week 4 Evidence Synthesis paper as instructed from your faculty feedback and track changes in your assignment.
  2. Please note more information is required for this assignment below and some sections are different.
  3. Use the most current version of Microsoft Word that is the format for all Chamberlain University College of Nursing found in student resources. The Document is labeled DNP and will end in “docx.”
  4. All Chamberlain University policies related to plagiarism must be observed.
  5. Review the rubric for the grading criteria.

The assignment includes the following components:

  1. Introduction
    1. Start your introduction with a powerful statement or two to stimulate interest.
    2. Present the purpose of your proposed project. Begin your formal purpose statement by stating, “The purpose of the proposed (DNP) project is to…”
    3. Provide a preview of what the paper will include with a strong thesis sentence outlining the paper’s content.
  2. Assessment
    1. Describe the practice problem at the national level. Support with data.
    2. Describe the practice problem at the practicum site. Support with data if available.
    3. Identify and describe the sources of data from the practicum site. For example, Incident reports, readmission rates, infection rates, etc.
  3. Planning—Evidence Synthesis
    1. Use the synthesis from the Week 4 assignment—be sure to accept track changes and update your Week 4 paper based on feedback provided by course faculty before adding to this paper.
    2. Identify the evidence-based practice (EBP) intervention to address the practice problem.
    3. Identify and discuss the main themes that emerge from the sources. (Cited)
    4. Contrast main points in the evidence sources. (Cited)
    5. Present an objective overarching synthesis of research evidence supporting the evidence-based intervention. (Cited)
  4. Implementation
    1. Briefly describe the DNP project evidence-based intervention.
    2. Explain the rationale for why this intervention was chosen.
    3. Identify the survey or data collection instrument, if using one, and why it was selected.
      1. If not using a survey/ instrument/ tool, how will you be collecting data? For example, chart audits.
    4. Describe your project implementation plan and include milestones.
  5. Evaluation
    1. Propose measurable outcomes for the project.
    2. Describe how the outcomes will be evaluated.
  6. Conclusion
    1. Effectively summarize your project plans in one to two comprehensive paragraphs that clearly describe your project plans:
      1. Briefly summarize the Practice Problem.
      2. Summarize how you will implement the project. 
      3. Summarize how you will evaluate the project.
  7. APA Standards and References
    1. Uses appropriate Level I headers.
    2. Creates the reference page in correct APA format.
    3. In-text citations are required in every section if information is used from published work
    4. Each reference has a matching citation and citations are in current APA style.
Writing Requirements (APA format)
  • Length: 5-7 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double-spaced pages
  • 12-point Times New Roman font or 11-point Arial
  • Headings & subheadings
  • In-text citations
  • Title page
  • References page
  • Standard English usage and mechanics
Program Competencies

This assignment enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

  1. Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
  2. Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
  1. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve healthcare. (POs 6, 7)
  2. Analyzes healthcare policies to advocate for equitable healthcare and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health.
  3. Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. 
Course Outcomes
  1. Examine the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in leading financial planning and management across healthcare settings. (PCs 5, 8; POs 2, 4, 9)
  2. Develop strategies to lead project planning, implementation, management, and evaluation to promote high value healthcare. (PCs 1, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 7)

NR711 Week 6 Assignment: Project Planning and Preparation Example

Project Planning and Preparation

Staff burnout and compassion fatigue are critical issues facing healthcare professionals today. The relentless demands of the healthcare provision and the emotional toll of caring for patients have led to a growing crisis. The proposed DNP project aims to reduce staff burnout and compassion fatigue among healthcare professionals at our practicum site. This project aims to implement evidence-based interventions, such as meditation, yoga, mindfulness, and resilience-building programs, as well as optimizing staffing ratios and managing workloads, to enhance the well-being and job satisfaction of our dedicated staff. This paper presents a comprehensive plan for addressing these pressing issues, encompassing assessment of the practice problem, evidence synthesis, implementation strategies, and an evaluation plan.

Assessment

Staff burnout and compassion fatigue have become endemic in healthcare, affecting the quality of patient care and the mental health of healthcare professionals. According to Ma et al. (2022), 80% of nurses working in demanding units, such as emergency departments, experienced moderate to high levels of compassion fatigue. On the other hand, burnout has become alarmingly widespread among healthcare professionals in the United States. As Reith (2019) highlights, more than half of physicians and nearly one-third of nurses experience symptoms associated with burnout. This pervasive issue poses a significant threat to the quality of patient care and can worsen the impending shortage of physicians and nurses.

Staff burnout and compassion fatigue are prevalent concerns at our practicum site, the mental health organization. An analysis of internal data from my practicum site indicates an increase in staff turnover rates, absenteeism, and a decrease in job satisfaction among our healthcare professionals. Data sources from our organization include incident reports documenting incidents related to staff burnout, surveys assessing job satisfaction and stress levels, and records of staff turnover rates. Additionally, qualitative data gathered through interviews and focus groups provide deeper insights into the experiences of our staff, supporting the evidence of staff burnout and compassion fatigue as a practice issue within the organization.

Planning—Evidence Synthesis

In recent years, staff burnout and compassion fatigue have gained considerable attention due to their adverse effects on healthcare professionals and various other occupations. Staff burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. In contrast, compassion fatigue is the emotional and physical exhaustion that results from prolonged exposure to suffering and trauma in the workplace. These issues can lead to decreased job satisfaction, increased turnover, and compromised patient care. Therefore, there is a need for evidence synthesis of interventions aimed at mitigating these challenges.

Resilience-Building Programs

Resilience-building programs have emerged as a central theme in addressing staff burnout and compassion fatigue. These programs focus on enhancing individuals’ ability to adapt to adversity and stress by providing training in emotional regulation and self-care strategies. A study by Paiva-Salisbury and Schwanz (2022) found that healthcare professionals who participated in a resilience program reported reduced burnout and increased job satisfaction. Additionally, they showed improved coping skills and emotional well-being. Similarly, Shiri et al. (2023) demonstrated that educators who engaged in resilience-building interventions experienced lower levels of compassion fatigue and emotional exhaustion. The compelling evidence supports the implementation of resilience-building programs as a primary intervention to enhance the mental and emotional well-being of healthcare staff.

Optimizing Staffing Ratios and Managing Workloads

Another crucial facet of mitigating burnout in high-stress professions, particularly healthcare, is ensuring appropriate staffing ratios and effective workload management. According to Dall’Ora et al. (2020), there is a direct correlation between understaffing and elevated rates of burnout. Adequate staffing levels and thoughtful workload management are crucial in alleviating stress, fostering a sense of job satisfaction, and enhancing overall job performance. While resilience-building programs offer valuable tools for individual coping, their effectiveness is maximized when combined with efforts to optimize staffing ratios and manage workloads effectively. This synergistic approach addresses both systemic and individual factors contributing to burnout.

Psychological Intervention

 Beyond institutional and systemic approaches, integrating psychological intervention methods like meditation, yoga, and mindfulness holds significant promise in addressing compassion fatigue. The systematic review by Aryankhesal et al. (2019) provides compelling evidence for the efficacy of these practices in enhancing emotional well-being and nurturing compassion satisfaction among healthcare professionals. For example, regular engagement in mindfulness practices has improved resilience and coping mechanisms, enabling individuals to navigate the emotional demands of their roles better (Bernburg et al., 2020). These psychological interventions complement other strategies, contributing to a more holistic approach to addressing compassion fatigue among the staff.

While resilience-building programs, staffing optimizations, and psychological interventions promise to mitigate staff burnout and compassion fatigue, it is essential to acknowledge that the effectiveness of these interventions may vary depending on the specific work environment, organizational culture, and individual characteristics. Some studies report limitations in the long-term sustainability of these interventions and the need for ongoing support and evaluation.

Implementation

The DNP project will implement evidence-based interventions, including meditation, yoga, mindfulness practices, resilience-building programs, optimizing staffing ratios, and workload management, tailored to the needs of our staff. These interventions were chosen based on their effectiveness in reducing burnout and compassion fatigue in similar healthcare settings. They address both individual and organizational factors contributing to these issues.

The project will employ a survey instrument to collect data on staff perceptions of burnout, compassion fatigue, and the impact of the interventions. The instrument will be selected for its ability to provide quantitative data to measure changes in staff well-being. Additionally, qualitative data will be collected through interviews to gain a deeper understanding of the experiences and perceptions of staff members.

The implementation plan and milestones for the DNP project will take an 8-12-week timeline, commencing with an extensive educational session for the staff to ensure their comprehensive understanding of the processes and interventions integral to the project’s progression. Following this, during weeks 2 to 8, the oversight of the implementation phase will be undertaken, including the introduction of evidence-based strategies. These strategies will comprise psychological intervention methods, such as meditation, yoga, and mindfulness, as well as resilience-building programs, optimizing staffing ratios, and managing workloads.

These specific weeks signify the pivotal period during which the interventions above will be fully integrated into the daily routines of the healthcare team. Subsequently, weeks 9 and 10 will initiate the data collection and analysis phase, evaluating the impact of the interventions on staff well-being, job satisfaction, and patient outcomes. Lastly, the project will conclude within the 8- to 12-week timeframe, culminating in the dissemination of findings and recommendations for perpetuating improvements in staff burnout and reducing compassion fatigue.

Evaluation

The evaluation of this project’s success hinges on measuring several vital outcomes. These include a reduction in staff turnover rates, an elevation in job satisfaction scores, an enhancement in mental well-being, as evidenced by survey results, and a decline in reported incidents linked to burnout and compassion fatigue. A multifaceted approach, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative methods, will be employed to assess these outcomes comprehensively.

The quantitative aspect will involve statistical analysis of survey data, enabling us to quantify shifts in staff perceptions over time. Meanwhile, the qualitative dimension will encompass a thematic analysis of qualitative data, offering a nuanced understanding of the qualitative impact of the interventions. Together, these methods will provide a comprehensive and holistic assessment of the project’s effectiveness in achieving its intended goals, both in terms of quantitative metrics and the underlying qualitative experiences of the staff.

Conclusion

The proposed DNP project addresses staff burnout and compassion fatigue among healthcare professionals at a mental health organization. The project will implement evidence-based interventions, including resilience-building programs, optimizing staffing ratios, and psychological interventions tailored to the organization’s specific needs, such as meditation, yoga, and mindfulness. The project’s assessment phase highlights the prevalence of burnout and compassion fatigue in healthcare, identifying internal data and qualitative evidence that support the practice problem within the organization.

The evidence synthesis phase emphasizes the efficacy of the chosen interventions based on research findings. In terms of implementation, the project will span 8-12 weeks, involving staff education, intervention integration, and data collection. The evaluation plan focuses on quantitative and qualitative measures, including reductions in staff turnover rates, increased job satisfaction, improved mental well-being, and a decline in burnout-related incidents, to comprehensively assess the project’s success in addressing these critical issues.

References

Aryankhesal, A., Mohammadibakhsh, R., Hamidi, Y., Alidoost, S., Behzadifar, M., Sohrabi, R., & Farhadi, Z. (2019). Interventions on reducing burnout in physicians and nurses: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 33(77), 77. https://doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.77

Bernburg, M., Groneberg, D., & Mache, S. (2020). Professional training in mental health self-care for nurses starting work in hospital departments. Work, 67(3), 583–590. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-203311

Dall’Ora, C., Ball, J., Reinius, M., & Griffiths, P. (2020). Burnout in nursing: A theoretical review. Human Resources for Health, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00469-9

Ma, H., Huang, S. Q., We, B., & Zhong, Y. (2022). Compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction and depression among emergency department physicians and nurses: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 12(4), e055941. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055941

Paiva-Salisbury, M. L., & Schwanz, K. A. (2022). Building compassion fatigue resilience: Awareness, prevention, and intervention for pre-professionals and current practitioners. Journal of Health Service Psychology, 48(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42843-022-00054-9

Reith, T. P. (2019). Burnout in United States healthcare professionals: A narrative review. Cureus, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3681

Shiri, R., Nikunlaakso, R., & Laitinen, J. (2023). Effectiveness of workplace interventions to improve health and well-being of health and social service workers: A narrative review of randomized controlled trials. Healthcare, 11(12), 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11121792