NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore the scope of the DNP project. Scope is the backbone of any project and must be accurately assessed by the project manager. When issues occur during a project, it is frequently related to the scope. A well-defined goal helps keep everyone on track. Have a look at NR711 Week 2 Assignment: Organizational Needs Assessment.

Instructions

Reflect upon your readings and personal or professional experience and address the following:

  1. Describe how issues that occur during a project are frequently related to the scope.
  2. Examine how poorly defined project scope statements are often linked to project problems or even to failed projects.
  3. Propose strategies to manage scope creep.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies:

  1. Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
  2. Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
  3. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve healthcare. (POs 6, 7)
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Develop strategies to lead project planning, implementation, management, and evaluation to promote high value healthcare. (PCs 1, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 7)

NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope Example

Issues related to scope during a project include underestimating the work by not involving all stakeholders, which can lead to increased expenses and potentially delay deadlines (Larsen et al., 2022). Other scoping problems include not adding non-original work to the project, clarifying the precise objectives, and not altering or raising the bar for objectives once the project is approved, incorporating the facility’s mission, vision, and goals (Barnden et al., 2023). Also, having thought and responses for the pros and cons of a project, ready to remove barriers to clearly defined goals and not having an active system to monitor or measure goals in use before, during, and after a project (Hut-Mossel et al., 2021; Larsen et al., 2022)

Poorly defined project scope statements are often linked to project problems. My project aims to enhance safety and reduce patient harm by decreasing pneumonia in non-ventilated admitted patients, aligning with goals already connected to the facility’s objectives (Barnden et al., 2023). Aligning project goals with facility goals will assist with buy-in from key decision-makers and my onsite preceptor. Due to the school’s eight-week timeline for implementing the project, it has limited what can be a measurable change.

My PICOT question is: For adults on a medical-surgical unit, does implementing an oral hygiene protocol, compared to current practice, impact the incidence of non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia within 8 weeks? According to my preceptor, the hospital did not meet its pneumonia goals for 2023, and the focus is on the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project to help achieve the hospital’s pneumonia reduction goals. Pitfalls would be to add to the PICOT question or the scope and goals beyond decreasing pneumonia admissions. Additionally, this does not include all key decision-makers, such as Chief Executive Officers and members of the Institutional Review Board (IRB).

The main strategies for managing scope are to plan early and communicate well. Connect with the preceptor and the quality improvement or technical support team to conduct an audit, ensuring accurate data can be reviewed for measurable goals that align with both the DNP project and the hospital’s objectives. Request a meeting or be placed on the IRB schedule for approvals and time for revisions, if needed. Additionally, I will prepare to answer questions for all stakeholders, including the direct care staff who will implement the oral hygiene protocol for admitted patients on the medical-surgical units.  

References

Barnden, R., Snowdon, D. A., Lannin, N. A., Lynch, E., Srikanth, V., & Andrew, N. E. (2023). Prospective application of theoretical implementation frameworks to improve health care in hospitals – a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 607–607. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09609-y.

Hut-Mossel, L., Ahaus, K., Welker, G., & Gans, R. (2021). Understanding how and why audits work in improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic realist review. PloS One, 16(3), e0248677–e0248677. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248677.

Larsen, A. S. A., Karlsen, A. T., Lund, J.-Å., & Andersen, B. S. (2022). Assessment of early warning signs in hospital projects’ front-end phase. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 15(2), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-06-2021-0156.