NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to assess for organizational gaps or problems, allowing you to explore the process you would follow to assess your selected organization. Have a look at NR711 Week 2 Discussion | Project Scope.

Instructions

Reflect upon your readings and consider the practice problem you have identified for your DNP project and respond to the following:

  1. Examine and describe the process you would follow to assess the organization where you plan to conduct your project for opportunities for improvement, including the identification of stakeholders.
  2. Determine the ultimate goals for your DNP project.
  3. Describe how your project goals relate to the organization’s mission and vision.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page: 

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Program Competencies

This discussion enables the student to meet the following program competencies: 

  1. Integrates scientific underpinnings into everyday clinical practice. (POs 3, 5)
  2. Uses analytic methods to translate critically appraised research and other evidence into clinical scholarship for innovative practice improvements. (POs 3, 5)
  3. Appraises current information systems and technologies to improve healthcare. (POs 6, 7)
  4. Analyzes healthcare policies to advocate for equitable healthcare and social justice to all populations and those at risk due to social determinants of health. (POs 2, 9)
  5. Leads others in professional identity, advanced clinical judgment, systems thinking, resilience, and accountability in selecting, implementing, and evaluating clinical care. (POs 1, 4)
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Examine the role of the DNP-prepared nurse in leading financial planning and management across healthcare settings. (PCs 5, 8; POs 2, 4, 9)
  2. Formulate a needs-based organizational assessment to inform strategic leadership decision-making. (PCs 1, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 7)
  3. Develop strategies to lead project planning, implementation, management, and evaluation to promote high-value healthcare. (PCs 1, 3, 4; POs 3, 5, 7)

NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment Example

Organizational Assessment

Health organizations play a crucial societal role by providing essential medical services, promoting well-being, and addressing health-related challenges. However, even the most well-intentioned organizations can face problems and gaps hindering their effectiveness and impact. According to Miake-Lye et al. (2020), an organizational assessment is essential in identifying these issues and implementing solutions to improve performance.

I have identified staff burnout and compassion fatigue as the primary organizational issues facing the mental health organization where I intend to conduct my DNP project. This paper aims to perform an organizational assessment to identify gaps, outline steps to examine the assessment process, establish DNP project goals, and align them with the organization’s mission and vision.

The comprehensive assessment process will employ various methods to identify organizational gaps related to staff burnout and compassion fatigue. Initial steps will involve direct observation and informal discussions with frontline staff, nursing leaders, and relevant employees, offering qualitative insights into daily challenges and perceptions. Structured surveys will provide quantitative data on burnout indicators, ensuring representation across all staff levels.

Involving the entire staff is crucial for a holistic understanding of the issue (Nilsen et al., 2020). Stakeholders encompass executive leadership, nursing managers, direct care providers, patients, and their families, offering distinct insights ranging from financial implications to the impact on patient care. Engagement via focus groups and surveys will enable a holistic understanding and collaborative identification of improvement opportunities.

My DNP project aims to reduce staff burnout and compassion fatigue, thereby enhancing the quality of care provided to patients with mental health and psychiatric needs. This will be achieved through implementing evidence-based interventions, organizational policy changes, and fostering a culture of well-being (Aryankhesal et al., 2019). Ultimately, the project aims to create a sustainable work environment that promotes staff resilience, engagement, and emotional well-being.

This project aligns with the organization’s mission to provide compassionate, patient-centered care while fostering a supportive and healthy work environment for its staff. The hospital’s vision is to become a center of excellence in mental health care delivery. The project aims to create a sustainable work environment that aligns with the hospital’s vision, supporting its aspiration to excel in mental health care delivery and become a center of excellence in the field.

References

Aryankhesal, A., Mohammadibakhsh, R., Hamidi, Y., Alidoost, S., Behzadifar, M., Sohrabi, R., & Farhadi, Z. (2019). Interventions on reducing burnout in physicians and nurses: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 33(77), 77. https://doi.org/10.34171/mjiri.33.77

Miake-Lye, I. M., Delevan, D. M., Ganz, D. A., Mittman, B. S., & Finley, E. P. (2020). Unpacking organizational readiness for change: An updated systematic review and content analysis of assessments. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4926-z

Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Birken, S. A., & Schildmeijer, K. (2020). Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: An interview study with physicians, registered nurses, and assistant nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8

NR711 Week 1 Discussion | Organizational Assessment Example 2

Sustainable outcomes improve intervention projects, and it is crucial to prepare with data, be community-centered, and have a plan to communicate progress often (Brakema et al., 2021). I do not work for the acute care hospital where I plan to conduct my project. Therefore, the process for opportunities for improvement comes directly through my preceptor and primary stakeholder, the Interim Chief Nursing Officer (I-CNO). Introductions were made with my I-CNO in September 2023. I aim to continue working on global burden of disease projects related to patient safety, activities of daily living, and prevention (Bernabe et al., 2020).

Namely, oral care should be performed two to four times daily, or the proper use of an incentive spirometer, to prevent hospital-acquired pneumonia. Intervention projects need relational leadership (Cummings et al., 2021). My preceptor encouraged me to pursue something I am passionate about, and in December 2023, provided some data indicating that the hospital had not met its pneumonia goals for 2023. Other stakeholders include the education and library team members for my access to the hospital, members of the internal review board, technology support, and the hospital statistician.

The DNP project aims to decrease incidents of non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia. The intervention promotes an oral hygiene protocol, including brushing teeth two to four times daily for 120 seconds, for all admitted patients on a medical-surgical floor. The technology and educational teams will be necessary to evaluate pre- and post-project implementation medical records. Evaluation will include documentation of pneumonia diagnosis post-admission, return admissions for pneumonia within 30 days, and direct care staff documentation of oral hygiene.

The hospital’s mission, “to improve the health and well-being of those we serve,” and its vision, “to be the partner of choice as we transform healthcare for our communities” (HonorHealth, 2024, para 1,2), are directly aligned with the project’s goals to decrease non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia. This alignment is significant as it underscores the project’s strategic importance and its potential to contribute to the hospital’s overall mission. The project is transformative in that it addresses primary and expected care that can have significant outcomes in lowering pneumonia rates.

References

Bernabe, E., Marcenes, W., Hernandez, C. R., Bailey, J., Abreu, L. G., Alipour, V., Amini, S., Arabloo, J., Arefi, Z., Arora, A., Ayanore, M. A., Bärnighausen, T. W., Bijani, A., Cho, D. Y., Chu, D. T., Crowe, C. S., Demoz, G. T., Demsie, D. G., Dibaji Forooshani, Z. S., … Kassebaum, N. J. (2020). Global, regional, and national levels and trends in burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Journal of Dental Research, 99(4), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034520908533.

Brakema, E. A., van der Kleij, R. M., Poot, C. C., Chavannes, N. H., Tsiligianni, I., Walusimbi, S., An, P. L., Sooronbaev, T., Numans, M. E., Crone, M. R., & Reis, R. R. (2021). A systematic approach to context-mapping to prepare for health interventions: development and validation of the SETTING-tool in four countries. BMJ Global Health, 6(1), e003221-. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003221.

Cummings, G. G., Lee, S., Tate, K., Penconek, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., Paananen, T., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2021). The essentials of nursing leadership: A systematic review of factors and educational interventions influencing nursing leadership. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 115, Article 103842–103842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103842.

HonorHealth. (2024). Mission, vision and values. https://www.honorhealth.com/company/mission-vision-values