NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question Instructions

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to demonstrate your understanding of the practice question in a practice change project. Have a look at NR716 Week 4 Discussion | Translation Science Theories and Models.

Instructions
  1. Using your selected practice problem, the appraised quantitative research study used in Week 1, and the evidence-based intervention from the Week 1 research study, write a one-sentence practice question.
  2. Use the format tool (PICOT), Johns Hopkins Individual Evidence Summary Tool, and the quantitative research study used in Week 1 to determine if your practice question is feasible in a practice setting.
    1. Identify the evidence-based intervention from the study.
    2. Identify the specific patient population who would benefit from this intervention in a practice setting.
    3. Identify the outcomes specific to the evidence-based intervention.
    4. Describe all biophysiological measures, any surveys or questionnaires, and the timing the outcomes were measured. As an example, were the outcomes measured every other week?

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

  • Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.
Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

  1. Analyze research and non-research data for the purposes of critical appraisal and judgment of evidence for translation into practice. (POs 1, 3, 5, 7, 9)
  2. Formulate an emerging practice question focusing on the evidence-based intervention to influence practice outcomes. (POs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9)

NR716 Week 3 Discussion | The Practice Question Example

The PICOT Question

In this week’s discussion, we are tasked to search for a PICOT question with an article from week one. The research title I have chosen is “Effects of a transitional home-based care program for stroke survivors in Harbin, China: a randomized controlled trial.”  The PICOT question is:

In stroke survivors, does a transitional home-based care program, compared to standard stroke care, impact the quality of life over 12 weeks post-discharge?

Stroke is a disease that impedes blood flow toward the brain and is characterized as a blockage or ruptured artery (CDC, 2022). When a stroke occurs, it affects brain function, which causes damage. The three identified challenges are physical, communication, and emotional challenges (ASA, 2023). Discharge in their communities faces challenges since neither the patient nor their caregivers can manage a stroke.

The intervention utilized a transitional home-based care program, which incorporated national stroke guidelines and a transitional care framework (Yuet Wong et al., 2022). The intervention begins 2 days before discharge, during which time nurses provide the patient with their caregiver’s post-discharge advice, including blood pressure monitoring, medication adherence, and guidance on dietary and daily living care, as well as rehabilitation exercises that can be performed at home (Yuet Wong et al., 2022).

The second intervention identified in the study is treatment and procedures, which included home-based exercises, involving 90 minutes per day, 5 days per week, for 12 weeks, to improve muscle strength and motor performance (Yuet Wong et al., 2022). The third intervention is the case management model, in which they process unresolved problems for patients in the community.

The fourth intervention involves surveillance by case managers, who provide support for the success of the intervention. The intervention was delivered to post-stroke survivors with a confirmed diagnosis of ischemic stroke, NIHSS score > 4 and <16, a Modified Rankin scale score of 2-4, and those discharged to home and independent (Yuet Wong et al., 2022). I can apply this to the practice setting, as we are on the Neuro Med-Surg floor and deal with various strokes, which will benefit from this program.

Significantly, the family and caregivers of this patient population will also be discharged. This intervention initially focused on the quality of life of stroke survivors. The study was used to measure the effectiveness of the intervention using the EuroQol-Five Dimensions 5-Level scale.  This instrument measured the mobility profile, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety, and depression with a single scale (Yuet Wong et al., 2022).

The intervention improved the quality of life, symptoms, self-efficacy, and activities of daily living. The other secondary measure they utilized was the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS), which showed significant improvement with the intervention. The data was collected during the 90-day and 180-day post-intervention follow-ups.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). About stroke. https://www.cdc.gov/stroke/about.htm.

American Stroke Association. (2023). Effects of stroke. https://www.stroke.org/en/about-stroke/effects-of-stroke.

Yuet Wong, F. K., Wang, S. L., Ng, S. S. M., Lee, P. H., Ching Wong, A. K., Li, H., Wang, W., Wu, L., Zhang, Y., & Shi, Y. (2022). Effects of a transitional home-based care program for stroke survivors in Harbin, China: a randomized controlled trial. Age and Ageing, 51(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac027.