NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Solution

The first step before starting to write the NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Chamberlain University.

How to Research and Prepare for NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Chamberlain University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Chamberlain University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique

In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”

How to Write the Conclusion for NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319

Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.

NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique Instructions

The purpose of this discussion is for you to search for qualitative evidence that contributes to practice change and improvement of a National Practice Problem. You will be proficient in research critique when using the Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool. You will gain experience in judging qualitative research for applicability to the practice problem. The critique of research focuses on potential solutions and interventions to improve outcomes. Have a look at NR715 Week 5 Assignment | Evidence Synthesis.

Instructions

Conduct a search of the Chamberlain library to find a single source of qualitative research on the National Practice Problem selected in Week 3. Be sure to use the most recent evidence available (within the past 5 years).

The qualitative source of evidence you select must be a single source of evidence. Systematic reviews and mixed-methods are not permitted for this assignment.

Present the written reference and permalink for the article selected.

Summarize the article and provide key findings including aim, method, analysis, and results within the chosen article.

Describe the value of the qualitative research findings related to the National Practice Problem.

Attach the completed Johns Hopkins Appraisal Tool to the discussion.

Please click on the following link to review the DNP Discussion Guidelines on the Student Resource Center program page:

Link (webpage): DNP Discussion Guidelines.

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Critically appraise literature for level and quality of evidence to support practice change. (POs 1, 3, 5, 6, 7)

Appraise global healthcare practice problems and DNP practice relevant to advanced nursing practice. (POs 1, 3, 9)

NR 715 Week 4 Discussion | Qualitative Article Critique Example

Qualitative Article Critique

Qualitative research is a type of research that generally relies on non-numeric data to explain the nature of a phenomenon. Qualitative research relies on data collected through observation, focus groups, interviews, and case studies (Allan, 2020). The focus of this discussion is to explore a quantitative article related to diabetes, provide its summary, and provide its findings’ value to the national practice problem.

The qualitative article selected is Challenges to Diabetes Self-Management for Adults with Type 2 diabetes in Low-Resource Settings in Mexico City: A Qualitative Descriptive Study by Whittemore et al. (2019).

The reference and permalink are:

Whittemore, R., Vilar-Compte, M., De La Cerda, S., Marron, D., Conover, R., Delvy, R., Lozano, A. M. & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2019). Challenges to diabetes self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes in low-resource settings in Mexico City: a qualitative descriptive study. International journal for equity in health, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1035-x

The article identifies the challenges encountered by type 2 diabetes patients living in low-resource settings in diabetes self-management, based on the perceptions of the adults with diabetes and the care providers in primary health institutions. The article’s key findings are that inadequate family support, lifestyle modification, inadequate resources, and mental health issues are among the challenges faced by diabetes patients in diabetes self-management. The care providers identified the major challenges of diabetes self-management as patient engagement barriers and inadequate resources. The article presents a descriptive qualitative study that used convenience sampling. Data collection was through semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using a content analysis approach.

Diabetes self-management impacts the glycemic targets of a specific population (Banerjee, Chakraborty, & Pal, 2020). The qualitative research findings presented in this article contribute to the existing knowledge base on the national practice problem of diabetes. According to Whittemore et al. (2019), Mexico is one of the cities with the highest prevalence of diabetes, especially type 2 diabetes.

It also has high diabetes-related mortality and morbidity rates and records difficulty meeting glycemic targets. Therefore, understanding the challenges that diabetes patients face in diabetes self-management would help address the problems with glycemic targets and enhance better health outcomes for diabetes patients. In conclusion, the research findings can be applied to understand the barriers to diabetes self-management for patients with diabetes in other populations with similar characteristics, thereby helping to address the global health issue.      

References

Allan, G. (2020). Qualitative research. In Handbook for research students in the social sciences (pp. 177-189). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070993-18/

Banerjee, M., Chakraborty, S., & Pal, R. (2020). Diabetes self-management amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, 14(4), 351-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.013

Whittemore, R., Vilar-Compte, M., De La Cerda, S., Marron, D., Conover, R., Delvy, R., Lozano, A. M. & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2019). Challenges to diabetes self-management for adults with type 2 diabetes in low-resource settings in Mexico City: a qualitative descriptive study. International Journal For Equity In Health, 18(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-019-1035-x