NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster Instructions

  • Create an abstract (100-250 words) and a poster for a presentation with voice-over for a quality improvement plan to executive-level leadership.

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, it is recommended that you complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. Have a look at NURS-FPX6107 Assessment 1 Curriculum Overview, Framework and Analysis.

As a master’s-level nurse you will be responsible for promoting equitable quality of care. In the biopsychosocial model of care, there are a number of areas where you can have an impact on improving the quality, safety, and equitability of care. One example area where equitable quality of care is an issue is with medications, especially considering the cost of various medications to treat the same condition versus the effectiveness and potential side-effects of the medications. A further pharmacological concern for safe and quality care is medication errors. This could include considerations like a patient getting the wrong medication or a dangerous interaction due to other aspects of a patient’s health and treatment situation. An example could be vitamin or herbal supplements the patient has not disclosed as part of the medication reconciliation process.

The ability to propose and promote quality improvements in care is a vital skill for a master’s-prepared nurse. One aspect of this is understanding strategies for implementing best practice changes in a team, department, or care setting. Another is understanding how best practices can help lead to a continuous quality improvement cycle. Additionally, it is important to grasp how successful change strategies can be leveraged to help in the creation or implementation of clinical best practices. Part of this is considering the audience when proposing quality improvement projects or new best practices. Another part of this is being able to effectively communicate the goals, rationale, and benefits of a project.

One way to communicate the need for quality improvements, and your plans for achieving specific improvements, is through a presentation poster. This type of communication tool is used both in the work place and at professional and academic conferences. Being able to convey the essence and value of a project in a compelling and succinct way is a valuable skill, and it is vital within the constraints of a single poster.

Professional Context

As a master’s-level nurse, you will be responsible for promoting equitable quality of care. In the biopsychosocial (BPS) model of care, there are a number of areas where you can have an impact on improving the quality, safety, and equitability of care. One example area where equitable quality of care is an issue is with medications, especially considering the cost of various medications to treat the same condition versus the effectiveness and potential side-effects of the medications. A further pharmacological concern for safe and quality care is medication errors. This could include considerations like a patient getting the wrong medication or a dangerous interaction due to other aspects of a patient’s health and treatment situation. An example could be vitamin or herbal supplements the patient has not disclosed as part of the medication reconciliation process.

Scenario

For this assessment, you may take any number of approaches. Two suggestions are:

  • Build upon the clinical issue that was the focus of your Change Strategy and Implementation assessment, and turn it into a full, organization- or community-wide quality improvement (QI) initiative.
  • Or, identify a new issue related to a BPS clinical issue. The focus here should be on a specific patient or health care setting

As a master’s-level nurse, your specific focus is on reviewing the implications of the data relevant to the clinical issue you are trying to address. Once you research this, review the aggregate data, and understand the BPS considerations relevant to the clinical issue, you can suggest strategies for improving the quality, equitability, and safety of care around the issue. You should act as an advocate for the value and need to pursue quality improvements to leadership and executives, as well as be able to present potential projects to a wide range of colleagues and community stakeholders.

Instructions

Create an abstract and a poster for a presentation with voice-over to your colleagues that will sell them on your quality improvement plan.

Abstract Requirements

  • Your abstract should be 100–250 words.
  • It should summarize the key information in your poster.
  • Do not put your abstract on the poster itself; submit it as a separate document. Or, if you are using PowerPoint to help create your poster, create a new slide that is clearly labeled as your abstract.

Poster Requirements

  • Your poster should include the following sections:
  • Quality Improvement Methods.
  • Evidence Supporting QI Methods.
  • Change Strategy Foundation.
  • Interprofessional Team Benefits.
  • Overall Project Benefits.
  • There are templates in PowerPoint or on the Internet that can help you get a start designing your poster.

The bullet points below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your presentation addresses all of the bullets below. You may also want to read the Quality Improvement Presentation Poster scoring guide and Guiding Questions: Quality Improvement Presentation Poster [DOCX] to better understand how each grading criterion will be assessed.

  • Propose quality improvement methods to promote continuous improvement related to a specific biopsychosocial consideration.
  • Evaluate specific evidence that supports the quality improvement methods proposed.
  • Explain how the project is grounded in successful change strategies.
  • Analyze the way in which interprofessional teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project.
  • Communicate quality improvement considerations to relevant stakeholders in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience.
  • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Example assessment: You may use the assessment example, Assessment 3 Example [PPTX], to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Submission Requirements

  • Length of submission:
  • Abstract: 100–250 words. Your abstract should be succinct and precise.
  • Poster: Make sure your poster fits entirely onto a single poster template page (or slide) and contains all of the sections described in the assessment instructions.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5–7 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your considerations and plans. Resources should be no more than five years old.
  • APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Design patient-centered, evidence-based, advanced nursing care for achieving high-quality patient outcomes.
  • Evaluate specific evidence that supports the quality improvement methods proposed.
  • Competency 2: Develop change strategies for improving the care environment.
  • Explain how the project is grounded in successful change strategies.
  • Competency 3: Apply quality improvement methods to practice that promote safe, equitable quality of care.
  • Propose quality improvement methods to promote continuous improvement related to a specific biopsychosocial consideration.
  • Competency 4: Evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of interprofessional care systems in achieving desired health care improvement outcomes.
  • Analyze the way in which interprofessional teamwork will improve the effectiveness or efficiency of the quality improvement project.
  • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
  • Poster is presented in a way that is clear, concise, and compelling for the audience.
  • Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

NURS-FPX6021 Assessment 3 Quality Improvement Presentation Poster Example

Change Strategy Foundation

Hello, and welcome to this presentation. This presentation provides direction and additional information on the quality improvement method selected to implement change strategies in diabetes care. According to Chireh et al. (2019), diabetic patients often suffer comorbid depression and diabetes-related distress due to the exhausting and overwhelming demands related to diabetes self-management lifestyles. Over 50% of diabetic patients have confirmed feeling overwhelmed and unable to take care of their mental health after the diagnosis.

In addition, most patients also blame their selves in case of diabetes self-management deficiencies leading to diabetes complications such as amputations, which further affects their health and quality of life negatively. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n.d.) notes that only 25%-50% of diabetic patients who suffer from comorbid mental illnesses are diagnosed and treated (CDC, n.d.). Untreated mental illnesses negatively affect diabetes management, clinical outcomes, and overall quality of life. 

Quality Improvement Method  

The DMAIC or Six Sigma model is one of the most widely used quality improvement frameworks to guide project implementation, which will also be utilized in this change strategy implementation. According to Khan et al. (2023), the framework consists of five steps: define, measure, analyze, improve, and control. The define stage entails identifying the problem, and the outcomes that the team will work towards achieving. The measure change will entail determining the processes and inputs that will have the most significant variations on the outcomes, developing a data collection plan and collecting the data.

The analysis stage will involve analyzing the collected data to identify the factors causing the variations in the outcome. The define stage entails deciding on a solution or a solution plan/developing the implementation and monitoring plans for the solution. Finally, the control stage involves sustaining the changes or outcomes achieved in the previous stage and implementing transition solutions if needed.

Evidence Supporting the QI Method

According to Kollipara et al. (2021), the Lean Six Sigma quality improvement model can be effectively used to implement interventions aimed at improving diabetes care. The study applied the method and realized an improvement in the number of patients with poor glycemic control. Khan et al. (2023) also note a sustained improvement following the implementation of a diabetes intervention using the Six Sigma model. The intervention in the study entailed increasing the frequency of measuring HbA1c levels among hospitalized patients with diabetes. Based on this evidence, the proposed change strategy implementation can also be successful in increasing the accessibility of mental health care services among patients with diabetes and sustaining the change.

Limitations of the DMAIC QI method

 There are several limitations to the use of the DMAIC model. First and foremost, the DMAIC model may not be entirely effective for care institutions that rely heavily on creativity, as it is somewhat rigid. Secondly, Ahmed (2019) notes that without the required skills and awareness, the implementation team may overlook the essential part of finding a solution to the current problem and implementing it to enhance continuous improvement by following the quality improvement implementation framework.

Additionally, the DMAIC method is lengthy and requires significant time, which may be a major constraint in a project where a solution is required within a short timeframe. The method also required a lot of resources to implement the change strategy; thus, there was a need to galvanize adequate resources to enhance implementation success. Moreover, using the framework and the interprofessional approach together may require additional time, thereby slowing down the implementation of solutions.

Potential Challenges in Implementation

According to Tlapa et al. (2022), potential difficulties in implementing change using the DMAIC quality improvement method include time and resource restrictions, the unavailability of nurses trained to offer mental care services to patients with diabetes, and the inability of diabetic patients to meet the related costs due to gaps in the health system and sociodemographic factors. These challenges should be addressed to ensure the successful implementation of the strategy. They can be overcome by seeking resources and support from executive leaders, adequately training the implementation team, employing nurses with training in mental health care, and improving the affordability of care to enhance equity.

Assumptions, Knowledge Gaps and Areas of Uncertainty

The implementation of the change strategy using the DMAIC quality improvement model is based on the following assumptions: the team is adequately prepared and equipped to address the biopsychosocial issue, the team will work together in collaboration, the required resources will be available, and the institution will support the solution and sustain continuous change. Additionally, insufficient data gathered during the measure change may lead to inappropriate conclusions, thus resulting in an inappropriate solution. Khan et al. (2023) note that further analysis on whether diabetic patients will readily use the provided mental care services would inform the implementation of the change strategy based on their needs and preferences.

Interprofessional Benefits

Implementing the change strategies will benefit the interprofessional team, and the team’s contribution will also lead to its success. The proposed change strategy will require the input of several professionals to work together. The team will include endocrinologists, nurses, nutritionists, doctors, psychiatric nurses, community health workers, and social workers who will contribute to monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the change. Working as a team will help ensure that all the patient’s needs in diabetes care have been considered and addressed. Interprofessional collaboration will also enhance patient safety and promote holistic patient care since all aspects of care will be considered. The interprofessional team will also be able to identify gaps in patient safety by incorporating the contributions of each team member. 

Overall Project Benefits     

The overall project benefits include the fact that the interprofessional approach in implementing the change strategy will enhance the provision of holistic care to diabetes patients, including improving the accessibility of mental health care services. Therefore, diabetic patients will be able to manage their condition more effectively, thereby preventing complications and improving their quality of life. Using the DMAIC quality improvement framework, the team will work together to contribute to the implementation and evaluate the outcomes of implementing the change strategy for diabetes patients. Additionally, quality improvement will be an ongoing process to ensure that all diabetic patients receive equitable and safe care that is continuous and meets all their needs, including mental health needs.

References

Ahmed S. (2019). Integrating the DMAIC approach of Lean Six Sigma and the theory of constraints toward quality improvement in healthcare. Reviews on Environmental Health, 34(4), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2019-0003

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (n.d.). Diabetes and Mental Health. Accessed April 21st 2023 from  https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/managing/mental-health.html 

Chireh, B., Li, M., & D’Arcy, C. (2019). Diabetes increases the risk of depression: A systematic review, meta-analysis and estimates of population attributable fractions based on prospective studies. Preventive Medicine Reports, 14, 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100822  

Khan, S. A., Demidowich, A. P., Tschudy, M. M., Wedler, J., Lamy, W., Akpandak, I., Alexander, L. A., Misra, I., Sidhaye, A., Rotello, L., & Zilbermint, M. (2023). Increasing Frequency of Hemoglobin A1C Measurements in Hospitalized Patients With Diabetes: A Quality Improvement Project Using Lean Six Sigma. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 19322968231153883. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968231153883

Kollipara, U., Rivera-Bernuy, M., Putra, J., Burks, J., Meyer, A., Ferguson, S., Nelson, C., Mutz, J., Mirfakhraee, S., Bajaj, P., Kermani, A., Fish, J. S., & Ali, S. (2021). Improving Diabetes Control Using Lean Six Sigma Quality Improvement in an Endocrine Clinic in a Large Accountable Care Organization. Clinical Diabetes: A Publication of the American Diabetes Association, 39(1), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd20-0048

Tlapa, D., Franco-Alucano, I., Limon-Romero, J., Baez-Lopez, Y., & Tortorella, G. (2022). Lean, Six Sigma, and Simulation: Evidence from Healthcare Interventions. Sustainability, 14(24), 16849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416849