NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

ByDaniel Rossi Updated on

NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design – Step-by-Step Guide

The first step before starting to write the NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design, it is essential to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment. 

It is also important to identify the audience of the paper and its purpose so that it can help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, you should review its use, such as writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review how to format the title page and the headings in the paper.

How to Research and Prepare for NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify the list of keywords from your topic using different combinations. The first step is to visit the university library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last words and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, for example, in APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list. 

You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching about. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next you should create a detailed outline of the paper so that it can help you to create headings and subheadings to be used in the paper. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.

How to Write the Introduction for NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part as it helps to provide the context of your work, and will determine if the reader will be interested to read through to the end. You should start with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.

How to Write the Body for NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence conducted from the research, ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance and how it connects to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between each paragraph by using transition words and a flow of ideas.

How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

In-text citations help the reader to give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their works. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:

The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Smith (2021), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Johnson and Brown (2020) highlight that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.

How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restarting your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper, by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. End with a call to action that leaves a lasting impact on the reader or recommendations.

How to Format the Reference List for NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design

The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded, in sentence sentence care. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication. 

Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:

References

Johnson, L. M., & Brown, R. T. (2020). The role of telehealth in improving patient outcomes. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35(2), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000456

Smith, J. A. (2021). The impact of technology on nursing practice. Health Press.

NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design Instructions

When politics and medical science intersect, there can be much debate. Sometimes anecdotes or hearsay are misused as evidence to support a particular point. Despite these and other challenges, however, evidence-based approaches are increasingly used to inform health policy decision-making regarding causes of disease, intervention strategies, and issues impacting society. One example is the introduction of childhood vaccinations and the use of evidence-based arguments surrounding their safety.

In this Discussion, you will identify a recently proposed health policy and share your analysis of the evidence in support of this policy. Have a look at NURS 6050 Discussion: The Role of the RN/APRN in Policy Evaluation.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Congress website provided in the Resources and identify one recent (within the past 5 years) proposed health policy.
  • Review the health policy you identified and reflect on the background and development of this health policy.

By Day 3 of Week 7

Post a description of the health policy you selected and a brief background for the problem or issue being addressed. Explain whether you believe there is an evidence base to support the proposed policy and explain why. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 7

Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by either supporting or respectfully challenging their explanation on whether there is an evidence base to support the proposed health policy they described.

*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.

NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design Example

Evidence Base in Design

One of the most recently proposed health policies is the Medicare-X Choice Act, which was introduced to Congress in 2021. By making Medicare-based plans available on the individual and small group markets, this program seeks to establish a public healthcare option. The program was inspired by the persistent problem of rising healthcare costs and the inability of many people, especially the uninsured and underinsured, to have access to affordable care (Ramachandran et al., 2021).

To facilitate the development of service partnerships and the establishment of data systems that enhance interactions among healthcare providers, the policy creates a grant program for educational institutions, community organizations, and health authorities. The policy also removes the prohibition on the Department of Health and Human Services negotiating Medicare prescription drug pricing. It raises the amount of the tax credit that can be claimed for health insurance premiums paid through an exchange.

The most important socioeconomic factors of this method are one’s level of income as well as one’s social standing. Those at lower income levels are overrepresented among the uninsured and underinsured, which restricts their ability to receive medical treatment. The Medicare-X Choice Act suggests a public option that is less costly overall and easier to get into as a possible solution to this issue.

The suggested policy is supported by the data that indicates its potential success. A study by Ghaddar (2021) shows that compared to the USA, countries with universal healthcare systems have lower healthcare expenses and better overall healthcare outcomes. In addition, the Congressional Budget Office concluded that the availability of a public option might reduce premiums on the individual market by up to fifteen percent.

 Most people would gain from this public option since it would improve competition in the private insurance market, hence lowering premiums. The Medicare program has a history of successfully providing seniors with high-quality medical treatment; extending this program to a larger population may enhance health outcomes while reducing healthcare spending. Increasing competition in the private insurance sector is one way in which the Act could boost healthcare quality (Dong et al., 2022).

All consumers may benefit from the availability of a public option since private insurance providers may be forced to reduce rates and enhance services to compete. In addition, the Act would save individuals money, and since Medicare is more effective and less expensive than private insurance, therefore a public option may help the government save money.

As was previously indicated, research has revealed that healthcare expenditures and results in nations with universal healthcare systems are lower than in the United States. Medicare has a history of successfully providing seniors with high-quality medical care at affordable costs. The Medicare-X Choice Act promotes a public healthcare option that is supported by the evidence above, as it would result in more benefits to the public when it comes to healthcare.

This strategy has the potential to enhance the health and well-being of many people, especially the most disadvantaged, by tackling the problem of rising healthcare costs and the lack of access to affordable healthcare. When the policy is implemented, there will be affordable and high-quality care delivery to many people.

References

Dong, X., Gindling, T. H., & Miller, N. A. (2022). Effects of the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act on health insurance coverage, healthcare access, and use for people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 15(1), 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101180

Ghaddar, S. (2021). Medicare for all: A health insurance literacy perspective. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice, 5(4), e272-e275. https://doi.org/10.3928/24748307-20210908-01

Ramachandran, S., Gravlee, E., & Pate, A. N. (2021). Pharmacists need to participate and pay closer attention to the Medicare for All discussion. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 61(4), e225-e229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2021.02.017

NURS 6050 Week 7 Discussion 1: Evidence Base in Design Example 2

Evidence Base in Design

The proposal to expand telemedicine services in healthcare has gained significant attention and traction in recent years. This policy initiative aims to leverage technology to bridge the gap between patients and healthcare providers, particularly in underserved and remote areas. The evidence supporting this policy is multifaceted and compelling, offering a glimpse into the potential transformative impact of telemedicine on healthcare access, patient engagement, cost-effectiveness, and overall health outcomes.

One of the most striking aspects of telemedicine is its ability to improve access to healthcare services, transcending geographical barriers. Numerous studies have underscored this key advantage (Sodhi et al., 2022). Accessing healthcare services can be daunting for individuals living in rural or remote areas, often requiring long journeys to healthcare facilities. Telemedicine changes this paradigm by enabling patients to consult with specialists and primary care providers from the comfort of their homes. This is especially crucial in emergencies or for individuals with mobility limitations who may struggle to visit a physical healthcare setting.

Furthermore, the evidence highlights the positive impact of telemedicine on patient engagement. In a world increasingly characterized by digital connectivity, telehealth platforms empower patients to take a more active role in managing their health. Remote monitoring tools, for instance, allow individuals to track their health conditions, such as blood pressure, blood glucose levels, and heart rate, in real time (Sodhi et al., 2022). These data-driven insights provide patients with a deeper understanding of their health and facilitate timely interventions by healthcare providers, potentially preventing the progression of chronic conditions.

A pivotal argument favoring telemedicine is the potential for significant cost savings for patients and healthcare systems. The evidence supporting this assertion is robust. Patients often incur substantial expenses related to healthcare, such as travel costs, parking fees, and the opportunity cost of taking time off work for medical appointments. Telemedicine eliminates or reduces many of these expenses (Hazenberg et al., 2020). Additionally, healthcare systems can benefit from cost savings by eliminating the need for extensive physical infrastructure, such as waiting rooms and office spaces. Furthermore, remote monitoring and early intervention through telemedicine can prevent hospitalizations among healthcare’s costliest components.

Another critical facet of the evidence is the positive impact of telemedicine on health outcomes. Telehealth interventions can improve health outcomes, particularly in chronic disease management. For example, patients with diabetes and hypertension who receive regular telehealth consultations and monitoring tend to achieve better control of their conditions. This improves their quality of life and reduces the burden on the healthcare system by minimizing the need for intensive treatments or hospitalizations (Hazenberg et al., 2020).

Patient satisfaction is another compelling aspect of the evidence supporting telemedicine. Surveys and feedback from patients consistently demonstrate high levels of satisfaction with telehealth services. Patients appreciate the convenience and flexibility that telemedicine offers, allowing them to schedule appointments at their convenience and avoid long wait times in crowded waiting rooms. This heightened satisfaction is a testament to the potential of telemedicine to enhance the patient experience, a crucial element of quality healthcare delivery.

Furthermore, telemedicine plays a critical role in emergency and disaster response. In times of crisis, whether due to natural disasters or public health emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic, the ability to remotely assess and provide guidance to individuals needing urgent medical care becomes paramount. Telemedicine has proven invaluable in these situations, helping healthcare providers triage and manage patients effectively, even when physical access to healthcare facilities is limited or compromised (Giacalone et al., 2022).

The global response to the COVID-19 pandemic serves as a real-world testament to the value of telemedicine. As the pandemic unfolded, healthcare systems worldwide were challenged by the need to maintain access to care while minimizing the risk of virus transmission. Telehealth services emerged as a crucial tool in this battle, allowing patients to receive care without exposing themselves or others to unnecessary risks. This experience underscores the adaptability and scalability of telemedicine in responding to healthcare crises.

Conclusion

The evidence supporting the expansion of telemedicine services in healthcare is both extensive and persuasive. It highlights the potential for improved access to care, enhanced patient engagement, cost savings, positive health outcomes, and heightened patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, successful implementation and ongoing evaluation are paramount to realizing the full benefits of telemedicine while mitigating potential challenges. As the healthcare landscape continues evolving, telemedicine is a promising tool for advancing healthcare access and delivery in the digital age.

References

Giacalone, A., Marin, L., Febbi, M., Franchi, T., & Tovani-Palone, M. R. (2022). eHealth, telehealth, and telemedicine in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Lessons learned and future perspectives. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 10(8), 2363. https://doi.org/10.12998%2Fwjcc.v10.i8.2363

Hazenberg, C. E., aan de Stegge, W. B., Van Baal, S. G., Moll, F. L., & Bus, S. A. (2020). Telehealth and telemedicine applications for the diabetic foot: A systematic review. Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 36(3), e3247. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3247

Sodhi, N., Weinstein, R. S., Stewart, K., & Doarn, C. R. (2022). Analysis of telehealth versus telemedicine terminology in the Telemedicine and e-Health journal between 2010 and 2020. Telemedicine and e-Health, 28(12), 1861-1865. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0073