NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison

NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison

NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison

The paperwork NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison and Analysis Across Theories presents overview on the theories about the field of nursing .

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Description of the Assignment , please read all the requirements and follow them , no plagiarism, 6 scholarly sources less than 5 years old, APA style latest edition,

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept that is important and useful to the nurse practitioner role.  The concept for this assignment must be supported by a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application as demonstrated through the creation of model, borderline, and contrary cases.  Theoretical applications of the concept are also discussed. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.  Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis. 

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction- The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:
    • Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.
    • Identifies the selected nursing concept.
    • Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept.
    • Names the sections of the paper.
    • Scholarly support is required.
  2. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept
    • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).
    • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  3. Literature review
    • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
    • Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
    • Support from nursing literature is required.
      • Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.
  4. Defining attributes, for this section: A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
    • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required. Explanation:  An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept.  For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed. NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison
  5. Antecedent and Consequence
    • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
    • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
      • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event.  In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept. A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation, a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.
  6. Empirical Referents
    • Two (2) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
    • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required. Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.
  7. Construct Cases
    • Explanation: Hypothetical or real-life situations demonstrating the use or absence of the concept. This section requires the creation of a model case, borderline case, and contrary case. Construct cases should be from the viewpoint of an advanced practice NP.
    • 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
      • Definition
      • All identified attributes. Explanation:  A model case is an example of a hypothetical or real-life situation that demonstrates all of the attributes noted previously in this assignment.
    • Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
    • 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case. Explanation:  Borderline case is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing. Contrary case is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept – all identified attributes are missing.
  8. Theoretical Applications of the Concept
    • Discuss the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.
    • Explain how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
    • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
  9. Conclusion
    1. Summarization of key information regarding:
      • Selected nursing concept.
      • Selected nursing theory.
      • Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing, specifically as an NP.
    2. The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 8 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
  2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
  3. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.
  4. A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
  5. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
  6. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
  7. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
  8. PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance. Please note: the concepts of incivility and civility are not allowed for this assignment. NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison

  • Adaptation
  • Burnout
  • Caring
  • Comfort
  • Compassion
  • Compassion fatigue
  • Competence
  • Cultural humility
  • Empowerment
  • Engagement
  • Health
  • Leadership
  • Meaningfulness
  • Modeling
  • Noise
  • Pain
  • Palliative care
  • Quality of life
  • Resilience
  • Self-care
  • Sensory overload
  • Situational awareness
ASSIGNMENT CONTENT
Category Points % Description
Introduction 8 4 The introduction substantively presents all the following elements:

  • Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.
  • Identifies the selected nursing concept.
  • Identifies the nursing theory that addresses the selected concept.
  • Names the sections of the paper.
  • Scholarly support is required.
Definition/Explanation of Selected Concept 20 10 This section includes:

  • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
Literature Review 28 14 This section requires:

  • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
  • Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
  • Support from nursing literature is required.
Defining Attributes 20 10 For this section:

  • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required
Antecedent & Consequence 20 10 This section requires the identification of:

  • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
  • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
  • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Empirical Referents 16 8 This section requires the identification of:

  • 2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
  • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Construct Cases 24 12 This section requires:

  • 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
  • Definition
  • All identified attributes
  • NP perspective
  • 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
  • 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
Theoretical Applications of the Concept 24 12 This section requires:

  • Discussion of the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.
  • Explanation on how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
  • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Conclusion 8 4 This section requires:

  • Summarization of key information regarding: NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison
  • Selected nursing concept.
  • Selected nursing theory.
  • Application of concept analysis findings to advanced practice nursing specifically as an NP
  • The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from conducting a concept analysis. (Self-reflection may be written in first-person.)
168 84% Total CONTENT Points= 168 pts
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT
Category Points % Description
Paper Specifications 16 8 A nursing theory was used.

The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.

Paper meets length requirements of 6 to 8 pages.

Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references.

A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
APA Format (6th edition) 8 4 Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

One deduction for each type of APA style error
Citations in Text 4 2 Ideas and information that come from readings must be cited and referenced correctly.
Writing Mechanics 4 2 Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
32 16% Total FORMAT Points= 32 pts
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 200 points

Rubric

NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_SEPT19

NR501NP WK3 Concept Analysis_SEPT19
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction1. Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development.
2. Identifies the selected nursing concept.
3. Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained.
4. A nursing theory was used.
5. Identifies the sections of the paper.
6. Scholarly support from nursing literature was provided.
8.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 7.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 6.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

 4.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one or two of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the required elements.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefinition/ Explanation of Selected Concept1. Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required).
2. Provides support from scholarly sources. NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison
20.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 18.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 17.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

 10.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements. Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review1. A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
2. Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
28.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 25.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 23.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements. Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

 14.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
28.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefining Attributes1. A minimum of 3 (three) attributes
2. Support from scholarly sources provided.
20.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the required elements.

 18.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 17.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

 10.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAntecedent & Consequence1. 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept.
2. 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
3. Support from scholarly nursing literature provided.
20.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 18.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 17.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

 10.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEmpirical Referents1. 2(two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.
2. Limited or no support from scholarly nursing literature was provided. NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison
16.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 15.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 13.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

 8.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the required elements.
16.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConstruct Cases1. 1 Model Case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:
• Definition
• All identified attributes
2. 1 Borderline Case is created by the student in which one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
3. 1 Contrary Case is created by the student that demonstrates the opposite of the selected nursing concepts. All identified attributes of the concept are absent in this case.
24.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 22.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 20.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the required elements.

 12.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.
24.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTheoretical Applications of the Concept1. Discusses the purpose of a concept analysis in relationship to theory.
2. Explains how the concept applies to the selected nursing theory.
3. A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
24.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 22.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 20.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the required elements.

 12.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the required elements.
24.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion1. Summarizes information on selected nursing concept.
2. Summarizes information on selected nursing theory.
3. Summarizes the application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.
4. Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained regarding concept analysis.
8.0 ptsExcellent

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the required elements.

 7.0 ptsV. Good

Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the required elements.

 6.0 ptsSatisfactory

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the required elements.

 4.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

Presentation of information in one or two of the required elements fails to meet expectations.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the required elements.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications1. A nursing theory was used.
2. The source of the concept for this assignment was a published nursing theory.
3. Paper meet length requirements of 6 to 8 page.
4. Minimum of 6 scholarly nursing references
5. A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, were NOT used as scholarly references.
6. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale was provided and the instructor approved them.
16.0 ptsExcellent

This section included all of the required elements.

 15.0 ptsV. Good

This section included three of the required elements.

 13.0 ptsSatisfactory

This section included only two of the required elements.

 8.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

This section included only one of the required elements.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

This section included none of the required elements.
16.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA StyleAPA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the:
• title page,
• running head,
• body of paper (including citations and headings), and
• reference page
One deduction for each type of APA format error
8.0 ptsExcellent

0 to 1 APA error present.

 7.0 ptsV. Good

2-3 APA errors were present.

 6.0 ptsSatisfactory

4–5 APA were are present.

 4.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

6–7 APA were are present.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

8 or greater APA errors were present.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations
4.0 ptsExcellent

1. There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2. Permission to use references older than 5 years was obtained from faculty.

 3.0 ptsV. Good

1. There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge 2. Permission to use references older than 5 years was NOT obtained from faculty.

 2.0 ptsSatisfactory

There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

 1.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting QualityGrammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual.
4.0 ptsExcellent

1–2 errors.

 3.0 ptsV. Good

3 – 4 errors.

 2.0 ptsSatisfactory

5 – 6 errors.

 1.0 ptsNeeds Improvement

7 – 8 errors.

 0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory

9 or greater errors.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductionsStudents are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison
0.0 ptsManual Deductions 0.0 ptsManual Deductions
0.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0

 NUR 513 Week 3 Concept Comparison

mersin escmersin esc