NUR 513 Grand Canyon University Week 4 Nursing Theories Paper
NUR 513 Grand Canyon University Week 4 Nursing Theories Paper
Compare and contrast two nursing theories. How do they differ based on their intent, scope, and goals? Which one might be more relevant to your future role, and why?
Please write answer 500 words at the most. Please include at least 2 citations and definitely 2 references used.
Thank you in advance.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENT
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria | Exceptional
(100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds
(88%) Very good or high level of performance |
Meets
(80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement
(38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing
(0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
Possible Points = 150 Points | |||||
Identification of a nursing theorist and their nursing theory | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Identifies a nursing theorist · Identifies a nursing theory that has been published
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
· Identifies a nursing theorist · Identifies a nursing theory that has been published |
Presentation of information lacks occasional important elements or specificity in all of the following elements:
· Identifies a nursing theorist · Identifies a nursing that theory that has been published |
Identifies a non-nursing theory or a borrowed theory used in nursing
OR Identifies a nursing theorist but does not identify the nursing theory |
Does not identify a theorist or theory | |
Reason for choosing this nursing theory | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 0 points | |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Student describes why they chose this nursing theory
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
· Student describes why they chose this nursing theory
|
Presentation of information lacks occasional important elements or specificity in all of the following elements:
· Student describes why they chose this nursing theory NUR 513 Grand Canyon University Week 4
|
Student does not describe why they chose this nursing theory
|
||
Summary of the nursing theory | 30 Points | 26 Points | 24 Points | 11 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Writes a brief summary about the nursing theory, include key concepts.
· Scholarly support is provided in APA current edition format.
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
· Writes a brief summary about the nursing theory, include key concepts.
· Scholarly support is provided in APA current edition format.
|
Presentation of information lacks occasional important elements or specificity in all of the following elements:
· Writes a brief summary about the nursing theory, include key concepts.
· Scholarly support is provided in APA current edition format.
|
Presentation of
information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· Writes a brief summary about the nursing theory, include key concepts.
· Scholarly support is provided in APA current edition format.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements:
· Writes a brief summary about the nursing theory, include key concepts.
· Scholarly support is provided in APA current edition format.
|
|
Nursing Metaparadigm | 30 Points | 26 Points | 24 Points | 11 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· A brief description of how this theory addresses each of the metaparadigm concepts: · Person · Health · Environment · Nursing
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
· A brief description of how this theory addresses each of the metaparadigm concepts: · Person · Health · Environment · Nursing
|
Presentation of information lacks occasional important elements or specificity in all of the following elements:
· A brief description of how this theory addresses each of the metaparadigm concepts: · Person · Health · Environment · Nursing
|
Presentation of
information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· A brief description of how this theory addresses each of the metaparadigm concepts: · Person · Health · Environment · Nursing
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in each of the following elements:
· A brief description of how this theory addresses each of the metaparadigm concepts: · Person · Health · Environment · Nursing
|
|
Usefulness of theory to nursing | 30 Points | 26 Points | 24 Points | 11 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Explains how this nursing theory is useful to the nursing profession
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
· Explains how this nursing theory is useful to the nursing profession
|
Presentation of information lacks occasional important elements or specificity in all of the following elements:
· Explains how this nursing theory is useful to the nursing profession
|
Presentation of
information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· Explains how this nursing theory is useful but does not address how it is useful to the nursing profession
|
Does not explain how this nursing theory is useful to the nursing profession
|
|
Application of Nursing theory to specialty
|
30 Points | 26 Points | 24 Points | 11 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Presents an example illustrating the use of this nursing theory in advanced nursing practice related to their MSN specialty
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
· Presents an example illustrating the use of this nursing theory in advanced nursing practice related to their MSN specialty
|
Presentation of information lacks occasional important elements or specificity in all of the following elements:
· Presents an example illustrating the use of this nursing theory in advanced nursing practice related to their MSN specialty
|
Presentation of
information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
· Presents an example illustrating the use of this nursing theory in advanced nursing practice related to their MSN specialty
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements:
· Presents an example illustrating the use of this nursing theory in advanced nursing practice related to their MSN specialty
|
|
Self-Reflection | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
· Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from completing this assignment.
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
· Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from completing this assignment.
|
Presentation of information lacks occasional important elements or specificity in all of the following elements:
· Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from completing this assignment.
|
· Self-reflection present but does not address the new knowledge gained from completing this assignment.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory or missing
· Self-reflection on the new knowledge gained from completing this assignment.
|
|
Writing Mechanics | 20 Points | 18 Points | 16 Points | 8 Points | 0 Points |
0–3 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing | 4–5 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage,
punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
6-7 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
8-9 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
10 or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling,
word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing. |
|
Total points = ______of 200 |