HLT 364 GCU Emerging Issues Within Healthcare Literature Review Template

HLT 364 GCU Emerging Issues Within Healthcare Literature Review Template

HLT 364 GCU Emerging Issues Within Healthcare Literature Review Template

Use the GCU Library to conduct a literature review. Select six to eight peer-reviewed primary research articles that provide critical support for the specific health care administration problem or barrier you want to address in your Business Research Paper.

Use the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” template to document your detailed assessment of each primary study. This document helps break down the components of each article to ensure the article meets the requirements for a professional health care paper. Ensure that each of your articles provides information that meets each criterion listed. Provide a detailed and clear explanation when describing how each article supports your business research topic (between three and five sentences).

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

This assignment uses a “Literature Review: Table of Evidence Grading Form” that corresponds to the “Literature Review: Table of Evidence” template. Instructors will be using the grading form to assess the assignment and provide useful feedback; therefore, students should review the grading form prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Literature Review: Table of Evidence Grading Form

Instructors will use this form to review each category for accuracy and appropriateness of articles, article interpretation (making sure articles meet assignment criteria), and to assess the degree to which the articles support the approved Capstone Project topic. Each category is scored based upon how the student’s work correlates within the criteria provided. Feedback is provided on each category to clarify the strengths and weakness of the material. Use this feedback to complete your Capstone Project Paper.

Student Name:

Category % Value Less Than Satisfactory Satisfactory Excellent Instructor Comments
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

15 0 – 9 Points

Eight or more research articles do not meet the criteria for being peer reviewed or from nursing journals. A number of relevant research articles are insufficient for this project. Less than eight articles are submitted overall.

Web links are missing or are insufficient to accurately validate content.

Major changes are needed.

 

10 – 13 Points

Eight or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment.

Web links are present, but not all are sufficient to validate content.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

14 – 15 Points

Eight or more research articles are clearly identified and meet the assignment criteria.

All Web links are present and sufficient for content validation.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points______________

 

 

 

 

 

 

Article Title and Year Published

 

10 0 – 6 Points

Eight or more research articles do not have accurate titles.

Most publications are more than 5 years old (minus seminal research).

7 – 8 Points

Eight or more research articles meet the majority of the requirements for the assignment. More recent publications are needed on only some articles or topics.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

9 – 10 Points

Eight or more research articles are clearly identified and meet all assignment criteria.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

 

Points________________

 

 

 

Article Interpretation Quality   Less Than Satisfactory

 

Satisfactory

 

 

Excellent

 

 

Instructor Comments
Research Questions (Qualitative)/ Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

5 1 – 3 Points

Research questions/ hypothesis are/is not clearly or accurately identified. Key information is missing in each category.

Student does not identify purpose of study in any of the articles.

Major changes are needed.

4 Points

Most research questions/ hypothesis are/is identified, and have key information presented in all articles, but with discrepancies.

Student identifies purpose only in some studies, or misidentifies purpose in some studies.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

5 Points

Key information is accurately presented for this category.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points________________

 

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

5 1 – 3 Points

Design identification (quantitative/qualitative) is missing in all or many of the articles.

The majority of the articles have been incorrectly identified.

Major changes needed.

4 Points

Design is identified for all articles, but with consistent misidentification of design type, or with major discrepancies.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

5 Points

Design is accurately identified correctly for all articles.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points______________

 

 

 

Setting/Sample

 

5 1 – 3 Points

Key information is missing or misidentified in each category.

Major changes are needed.

4 Points

Key information is presented, but with discrepancies.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

5 Points

All key information is accurately presented for each category.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points______________

 

 

Methods: Intervention/ Instruments

 

5 1 – 3 Points

Method information is missing for all or some articles.

Major changes are needed.

4 Points

Method information is presented in all articles, but with inaccuracies.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

5 Points

Methods are accurately presented for each category.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points______________

 

 

Analysis

 

5 1 – 3 Points

Analysis is missing for all or some articles.

Major changes are needed.

4 Points

Analysis is presented for all articles, but with discrepancies.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

5 Points

Analysis accurately presented for each article.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points______________

 

 

Key Findings

 

5

 

1 – 3 Points

Key information on findings is missing in all or some articles.

Major changes are needed.

4 Points

Key findings are presented in all articles, but with missing information or discrepancies.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

5 Points

Key findings are accurately presented for this category.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points______________

 

 

 

Recommendations

 

5 1 – 3 Points

Recommendations are missing on some or all articles.

Recommendations for all or many articles lack rationale, clarity, or accuracy.

Major changes are needed.

 

4 Points

Recommendations are presented in all articles, but some are lacking in rationale, clarity, or accuracy.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

5 Points

Recommendations are accurately presented for each category.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

Points______________

 

 

 

Supporting Rationale   Less Than Satisfactory

 

Satisfactory

 

Excellent

 

 

Instructor Comments
Explanation of How the Article Supports Capstone

 

40 0 – 27 Points

Explanations are missing for all or some of the articles.

Explanations generally lack adequate support and rational for the Capstone Project.

Major changes are needed.

28 – 36 Points

Explanations are provided for all articles, but explanations are superficial.

Explanations offer minimal support and rationale to support the Capstone Project.

Moderate changes are needed.

 

37 – 40 Points

Thorough, detailed explanation is provided for all articles.

Specific article content is referenced, showing support for the Capstone Project.

No changes or minor changes are needed.

 

Points______________

 

 

 

Overall Comments

 

 

 

Total Points Awarded ______________

Literature Review: Table of Evidence

Student Name:

Describe the barrier or issue in health care that you want to address for your Capstone Project Paper (two or three sentences):

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

 

       
Article Title and Year Published

 

         
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

         
Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other)

 

         
Setting/Sample

 

         
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

         
Analysis

 

         
Key Findings

 

         
Recommendations

 

         
Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified  Barrier or Issue in Health Care          

 

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

 

       
Article Title and Year Published

 

         
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

         
Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other)

 

         
Setting/Sample HLT 364 GCU Emerging Issues Within Healthcare Literature Review Template

 

         
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

         
Analysis

 

         
Key Findings

 

         
Recommendations

 

         
Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified  Barrier or Issue in Health Care          
Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4 Article 5
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

 

       
Article Title and Year Published

 

         
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study

 

         
Design (Quantitative, Qualitative, or other)

 

         
Setting/Sample

 

         
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

         
Analysis

 

         
Key Findings

 

         
Recommendations

 

         
Explanation of How the Article Supports Your Identified  Barrier or Issue in Health Care          

mersin escmersin esc