HLT 308V Grand Canyon University Week 2 Patient Confidentiality Discussion

HLT 308V Grand Canyon University Week 2 Patient Confidentiality Discussion

HLT 308V Grand Canyon University Week 2 Patient Confidentiality Discussion

DQ 1.

With the growing importance of increasing wage rates for employees, many health care organizations are implementing technology such as self-help kiosks to reduce staffing. Describe both an advantage and a disadvantage to this practice and discuss how patients may perceive reductions in dedicated staffing.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR ASSIGNMENT

DQ 2.

Research the role of an administrator versus that of a non-management staff member in dealing with a workers’ compensation incident in a typical health care organization (such as a hospital). What are the minimal responsibilities and reporting duties for each? What recommendations would you suggest for improving organizational compliance with regulatory requirements at the staff level? Support your analysis with a minimum of one peer-reviewed reference.

ASSIGNMENT PAPER part 1 of 2

PART ONE

An OUTLINE (part two is week 5 will be the power point presentation of this outline)

Topic: EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ON RISK MANAGEMENT

The purpose of this assignment is to create an educational program that supports the implementation of risk management strategies in a health care organization.(For staff at MEDICAL SPA Facilities)

In this assignment, you will develop an outline for an “in‐service”‐style educational risk management program for employees of a particular health care organization that will then form the basis for a PowerPoint presentation in Week 5. Select your topic (Patient Privacy & confidentiality) for this educational session from one of the proposed recommendations or changes you suggested in the Risk Management Program Analysis – Part One assignment to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards in your chosen risk management plan example.

Create a 500‐750-word comprehensive outline that communicates the following about your chosen topic:

  • Introduction: Identify the risk management topic you have chosen to address and why it is important within your health care sector.
  • Rationale: Illustrate how this risk management strategy is lacking within your selected organization’s current risk management plan and explain how its implementation will better meet local, state, and federal compliance standards.
  • Support: Provide data that indicate the need for this proposed risk management initiative and demonstrate how it falls under the organization’s legal responsibility to provide a safe health care facility and work environment.
  • Implementation: Describe the steps to implement the proposed strategy in your selected health care organization.
  • Challenges: Predict obstacles the health care organization may face in executing this risk management strategy and propose solutions to navigate or preempt these potentially difficult outcomes.
  • Evaluation: Outline your plan to evaluate the success of the proposed risk management program and how well it meets the organization’s short-term, long-term, and end goals.
  • Opportunities: Recommend additional risk management improvements in adjacent areas of influence that the organization could or should address moving forward.

You are required to support your statements with a minimum of six citations from appropriate credible sources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style.

***This assignment uses a RUBRICS . Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

RUBRICS (out of 100%)- WEEK 2 ASSIGNMENT

  1. INTRODUCTION (10% of grade)

An introduction is comprehensive. The submission incorporates analysis of supporting evidence as to why increased attention to the proposed risk management strategy is needed and provides specific examples of why it is important within the specified health care sector. Level of detail is appropriate.

  1. RATIONALE (10% of grade)

A rationale is comprehensive. The submission provides specific examples of where the proposed risk management strategy is lacking in the selected plan and provides insightful supporting evidence as to how its implementation will better meet compliance standards. Level of detail is appropriate.

  1. SUPPORT (10% of grade)

Support data are comprehensive. The submission incorporates an analysis of how the data indicate a need for the proposed risk management initiative. Level of detail is appropriate.

  1. IMPLEMENTATION (10% of grade)

Implementation strategies are comprehensive. The submission provides specific actionable steps by which the selected health care organization can implement the proposed risk management initiative. Level of detail is appropriate.

  1. CHALLENGES (10% of grade)

Possible challenges to the risk management implementation are comprehensive. The submission provides specific relevant examples of solutions for navigating or preempting predicted obstacles. Level of detail is appropriate.

  1. EVALUATION (10% of grade)

Evaluation strategies are comprehensive. The submission provides specific examples of how the evaluation plan will assess alignment with the short-term, long-term, and end goals of the risk management program. Level of detail is appropriate.

  1. OPPORTUNITIES (15 % of grade)

Additional risk management opportunities are described comprehensively, with detailed support for the recommended changes. Level of detail is appropriate.

  1. THESIS DEVELOPMENT AND PURPOSE (5% of grade)

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

  1. MECHANICS OF WRITING (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5% of grade

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. PAPER FORMAT- APA STYLE (5% of grade)

All (APA style) format elements are correct.

  1. DOCUMENTATION OF ALL SOURCES- citations and references (5% of grade)

All x6 required Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Research and citations are supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive. Addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

mersin escmersin esc