DNP 820 Week 8 Scholarly Activities Assignment

DNP 820 Week 8 Scholarly Activities Assignment

DNP 820 Week 8 Scholarly Activities Assignment

Permalink: https://nursingbay.com/dnp-820-week-8-s…ities-assignment/ ‎

Details:

Throughout the DNP program, learners are required to provide a report documenting participation in a minimum of four scholarly activities outside of clinical or professional practice. These reports will be due in specific courses throughout the program, as described below, and must be documented in your Practice Portfolio by the end of each course in which an activity report is due.

Examples of scholarly activities include attending conferences, seminars, grand rounds, participating in policy and quality improvement committees, writing scholarly publications, participating in community planning, serving as a guest lecturer, etc. Involvement in and contribution to interdisciplinary initiatives are also acceptable scholarly activities.

Documentation of these activities is required in DNP-810, DNP-820, DNP-830, and DNP-840.

A summary report of the scholarly activity, including who, what, where, when and take home points, will be submitted as the assignment. Include the appropriate program competencies associated with the scholarly activity and future professional goals related to this activity. You may use the “Scholarly Activity Summary” template to help guide this assignment.

Scholarly_ Activity_Summary_Template.doc

Case Report Rubric

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content  
15.0 %Identification of Topic of Concern  Identification and description of topic of concern are not present. Identification and description of topic of concern are present but incomplete. Identification and description of topic of concern are present but done at a perfunctory level. Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly presented and in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly presented and in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is not present. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is present but incomplete. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is present but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
5.0 %Introduction and Problem Statement An introduction with problem statement is not present. An introduction with problem statement is present but incomplete. An introduction with problem statement is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An introduction with problem statement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
5.0 %Brief Literature Review A brief literature review is not present. A brief literature review is present but incomplete. A brief literature review is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
5.0 %Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions A description of the case, situation, or conditions is not present. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but incomplete. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
5.0 %Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized Literature Findings A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is not present. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but incomplete. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
5.0 %Case Summary A case summary is not present. A case summary is present but incomplete. A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A case summary is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified Technology Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues Proposed solutions are not presented. Proposed solutions are presented but are incomplete. Proposed solutions are presented but are rendered at a perfunctory level. Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
5.0 %Conclusion A conclusion is not presented. A conclusion is presented but is incomplete. A conclusion is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory level. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format  
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

 

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
nursingbay