Discussion Week 4: Nursing Research And Evidence-Based Practice

Discussion Week 4: Nursing Research And Evidence-Based Practice

Discussion Week 4: Nursing Research And Evidence-Based Practice

In a 5-page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate a study. instruction below.

The final project presents a culmination of nursing research and evidence-based practice (EBP)knowledge as students choose a qualitative or quantitative study to critically evaluate, including making a recommendation for utilization in EBP.

In a 5-page paper (excluding title page and references), critically evaluate the study blow.

Staff Practice, Attitudes, and Knowledge/Skills Regarding Evidence-Based Practice Before and After an Educational Intervention

Please choose one to critically evaluate qualitative or quantitative.

Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to EBP. Use the Final Project Rubric provided below to help you develop and organize your final paper. Please remember to follow APA 6th edition formatting for the title page, body of the paper, and reference page.

Rubric or Grading Criteria: use each Competency as sub heading in the paragraph.

 

Competency

 

10.5 points

 

6 points

 

4 points

 

0 points

 

Total

 

Evaluates credibility of research article the components of the appropriate evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

p. 23

 

Evaluates credibility of research article using most of the components (Greater than 2/3) of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates credibility of research article using 2/3 of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates credibility of research article using one-third or less of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

 

No paper submitted, content missing.

 

/10.5

 

Evaluates the problem statement and research design using the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

Design p.23

Problem statement p. 104 Discussion Week 4: Nursing Research And Evidence-Based Practice

 

 

Evaluates the problem statement and research design using most of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates the problem statement and research design using half of the components of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates the problem statement and research design using one-third or less of the evaluation checklists in Houser (2018).

 

No paper submitted, content missing.

 

/10.5

 

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

p. 75

 

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates ethical issues in the study using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

No paper submitted, content missing.

 

/10.5

 

Evaluates the purpose statement using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

p.104

 

Evaluates the purpose statement using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

 

Evaluates the purpose statement using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

 

Evaluates the purpose statement using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

 

No paper submitted, content missing.

 

/10.5

 

Evaluates the literature review using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

p.117

 

Evaluates the literature review using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

 

Evaluates the literature review using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

 

Evaluates the literature review using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

 

No paper submitted, content missing.

 

/10.5

 

Evaluates the sampling strategy using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

p.179

 

Evaluates the sampling strategy using most of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates the sampling strategy using half of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates the sampling strategy using one-third or less of the components of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

 

No paper submitted, or content missing.

 

/10.5

 

Evaluates the measurement strategy and validity in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

pp. 345,221

OR

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the checklist components in Houser (2018).

pp. 411,437

 

Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using most of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018)

OR.

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using most of the components in the checklist components in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using half of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

OR

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using half of the components of the checklist in Houser (2018).

 

Evaluates the measurement strategy in quantitative studies using one-third of the evaluation checklist in Houser (2018).

OR

Evaluates trustworthiness of data in qualitative studies using one-third or less of the components of the checklist in Houser (2018).

 

No paper submitted, content missing.

 

/10.5

 

Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP.

 

Evaluates how study results may (or may not) be used to inform EBP.

 

Discusses study results in general but not how findings may or may not contribute to EBP.

 

Does not discuss results or how study findings can inform EBP.

 

No paper submitted or content missing

 

/10.5

 

Competency

 

7 points

 

5 points

 

2.5 points

 

0 points

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

mersin escmersin esc