Change Implementation with an Interprofessional Approach Presentation: NUR 514 Assignment

Change Implementation with an Interprofessional Approach Presentation

Change Implementation with an Interprofessional Approach Presentation: NUR 514 Assignment

Details:

In a complex and fast-paced healthcare environment, change is inevitable and constant. The advanced practice nurse is required to lead and adapt to the constant changing environment while working with multidisciplinary teams. Imagine you are assigned by your director to work with a multidisciplinary team that is assisting with transition from the current paper record-based system to an electronic health record (EHR).

Create a PowerPoint presentation (10-15 slides) in which you will assess the situation and the steps that should be taken to successfully implement the change. Be sure to include 100-250 word presenter’s notes per slide. Your presentation should address the following:

  1. Describe the driving forces that relate to the need for implementing electronic health records.
  2. Identify the key interprofessional stakeholders (both internal and external) that should be involved in change efforts.
  3. Outline how you would initiate the change and be a change advocate. Utilizing change theory and innovative models of care, explain how you would provide a structure for the planned change to achieve successful implementation of the EHR.
  4. Demonstrate how the change will affect current workflows. What revised workflow would you implement?
  5. Identify resources (human, time, material, etc.) required for implementation.
  6. Identify risks within the implementation plan. What are the impacts of the poor planning on cost, quality, and safety?
  7. Identify potential barriers when implementing the change and discuss how you will handle resistance.

Integrate 3-5 scholarly sources into your presentation.

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NUR 514 Assignment

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This Implementing Change With an Interprofessional Approach Presentation assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this Implementing Change With an Interprofessional Approach Presentation assignment to LopesWrite.

Top of Form

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.

New Attempt

Bottom of Form

Change Implementation with an Interprofessional Approach Presentation

  1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00%
3
Satisfactory
88.00%
4
Good
92.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Conte  
5.0 %Driving Forces of EHRS A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is not included. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is incomplete or incorrect. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is included, but lacks supporting detail. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of the driving forces that related to need for implementing EHRs is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.
5.0 %Key Interpro-fessional Stakeholders Identification of the key interpro-fessional stakeholders is not included. Identification of the key interpro-fessional stakeholders is incomplete or incorrect. Identification of the key interpro-fessional stakeholders is included, but lacks supporting detail. Identification of the key interpro-fessional stakeholders is completed and includes supporting detail. Identification of the key interpro-

fessional stakeholders is extremely thorough and includes substantial details

10.0 %Change Initiative and Being a Change Advocate An outline of how change would be initiated is not included. An outline of how change would be initiated is incomplete or incorrect. An outline of how change would be initiated is included, but lacks supporting detail. An outline of how change would be initiated is completed and includes supporting detail. An outline of how change would be initiated is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.
5.0 %Impact of the Change on Current Workflows A description of how the change will affect current workflows is not included. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is incomplete or incorrect. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is included, but lacks supporting detail. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of how the change will affect current workflows is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.
5.0 %Required Resources for Implementation Identification of required resources for implementation is not included Identification of required resources for implementation is incomplete or incorrect. Identification of required resources for implementation is included, but lacks supporting detail. Identification of required resources for implementation is completed and includes supporting detail. Identification of required resources for implementation is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.
5.0 %Risks Within Implementation A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is not included. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is incomplete or incorrect. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is included but lacks supporting detail. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of potential risks within the implementation plan is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.
5.0 %Potential Barriers A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is not included. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is incomplete or incorrect. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is included, but lacks supporting detail. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is completed and includes supporting detail. A description of potential barriers when implementing the change and handling resistance is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.
30.0 %Presentation of Content The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
10.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage Change Implementation with an Interprofessional Approach Presentation

 

Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
nursingbay